Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제8권1호
  • /
  • Pages.37-56
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Post-seismic assessment of existing constructions: evaluation of the shakemaps for identifying exclusion zones in Emilia

  • Braga, Franco (Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, University of Rome "La Sapienza") ;
  • Gigliotti, Rosario (Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, University of Rome "La Sapienza") ;
  • Monti, Giorgio (Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, University of Rome "La Sapienza") ;
  • Morelli, Francesco (Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa) ;
  • Nuti, Camillo (Department of Architecture, University of Roma) ;
  • Salvatore, Walter (Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa) ;
  • Vanzi, Ivo (Department of Engineering and Geology, University of Chieti-Pescara)
  • 투고 : 2013.08.29
  • 심사 : 2014.07.07
  • 발행 : 2015.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The Emilia, May-July 2012, earthquake has dramatically highlighted the only the hazards facing the people in insufficiently secured workplaces, but also the socio-economic consequences of interruption of production activities. After the event, in order to guarantee suitable safety levels, the Italian government asked for a generalized seismic retrofit of buildingsaffected by the earthquake under consideration. Considering that Emilia is one of the most industrialized Italian region, the number of the industrial buildings to be verified could however lead to not acceptable resumption of production time. So, with the aim to speed up the recovery, were leaved out from this request the buildings which had undergone a strong enoughshaking without any damage. In practice, the earthquakes were being used as a "test" to evaluate the seismic structural strength. Besides, the Italian government provision specifies also the zones, within which buildings that escaped evident damage are exempt from obligatory checks, and termed "exclusion zones", shall be individuated using the data provided by the Italian National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology in the form of so-called "shakemaps". Obviously, the precision of such data greatly influences the determination of the exclusions zones and so all the economic issues related to them. Starting from these considerations, the present paper describes an evaluation of the reliability of the procedure of shakemap generation with specific regard to the seismic events that struck the Emilia region on May 20 and 29, 2012.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ambraseys, N.N., Simpson, K.A. and Bommer, J.J. (1996), "Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 371-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<371::AID-EQE550>3.0.CO;2-A
  2. Bommer, J.J. and Elnashai, A.S. (1999), "Displacement spectra for seismic design", J. Earthq. Eng., 3(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469909350338
  3. Braga, F., Gigliotti, G., Monti, G., Morelli, F., Nuti, C., Salvatore, W. and Vanzi, I. (2014), "Speedup of post earthquake community recovery. The case of precast industrial buildings after the Emilia 2012 earthquake", B. Earthq. Eng., DOI 10.1007/s10518-014-9583-3.
  4. Borcherdt, R.D. (1994), "Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification)", Earthq. Spectra, 10, 617-654. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585791
  5. Cultrera, G., Faenza, L., Meletti, C., D'Amico, V., Michelini, A. and Amato, A. (2014), "Shakemaps uncertainties and their effects in the post-seismic actions for the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes", B. Earthq. Eng., DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9577-6.
  6. Governo Italiano (2012), Decreto Legge 6 giugno 2012, n. 74, Interventi urgenti in favore delle popolazioni colpite dagli eventi sismici che hanno interessato il territorio delle province di Bologna, Modena, Ferrara, Mantova, Reggio Emilia e Rovigo, il 20 e il 29 maggio 2012, Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana n.131 of June 7th.
  7. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, INGV (2012), "ShakeMap home page, available at http://shakemap.rm.ingv.it/shake/index.html".
  8. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, ISTAT (2012), Annuario Statistico Italiano 2012, Istat-Istituto nazionale di statistica, Roma, Italy.
  9. Michelini, A., Faenza, L., Lauciani, V. and Malagnini, L. (2008), "ShakeMap implementation in Italy", Seismol. Res. Lett., 79(5), 688-697. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.5.688
  10. Ministero delle Infrastrutture (2008) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, D.Min.Inf. 14 gennaio 2008, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 of february 4th 2008-Suppl. Ordinario n. 30.
  11. Parlamento Italiano (2012), Legge 1 agosto 2012, n. 122, Conversione in legge, con modificazioni, del decreto-legge 6 giugno 2012, n. 74, recante interventi urgenti in favore delle popolazioni colpite dagli eventi sismici che hanno interessato il territorio delle province di Bologna, Modena, Ferrara, Mantova, Reggio Emilia e Rovigo, il 20 e il 29 maggio 2012, Gazzetta Ufficiale Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana n. 180, August 3rd.
  12. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., Kanamori, H., Scrivner, C.W. and Worden, C.B. (1999), "TriNet" ShakeMaps": Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California", Earthq. Spectra, 15(3), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586057
  13. Wald, D.J., Worden, B.C., Quitoriano, V. and Pankow, K.L. (2006), "ShakeMap manual: users guide, Technical Manual, and Software Guide, v.1.0", available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/12A01/pdf/508TM12-A1.pdf.

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic evaluation of cemented material dams -A case study of Tobetsu Dam in Japan vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.717
  2. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical centers at urban scale 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1402969
  3. Observational failure analysis of precast buildings after the 2012 Emilia earthquakes vol.11, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.327
  4. Damage-Based Inelastic Seismic Spectra vol.17, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455417501152
  5. Ground motions and scaling techniques for 3D performance based seismic assessment of an industrial steel structure 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0244-1
  6. An enhanced component based model for steel connection in a hybrid coupled shear wall structure: Development, calibration and experimental validation vol.176, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.08.002
  7. Seismic assessment of two masonry Baroque churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake vol.79, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.026
  8. Empirical seismic fragility for the precast RC industrial buildings damaged by the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes vol.46, pp.14, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2906
  9. Seismic behavior of an industrial steel structure retrofitted with self-centering hysteretic dampers vol.139, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.025
  10. An innovative seismic-resistant steel frame with reinforced concrete infill walls vol.141, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.019
  11. Preliminary data and field observations of the 21st August 2017 Ischia earthquake pp.1573-1456, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0490-x
  12. Experimental Investigation of the Shear Strength of RC Beams Extracted from an Old Structure and Strengthened by Carbon FRP U-Strips vol.8, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071182
  13. Proposal of a Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) vol.13, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.539
  14. Design and Analysis of Automated Rack Supported Warehouses vol.12, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501812010150
  15. Seismic damage and fragility assessment of ancient masonry churches located in central Chile vol.18, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00831-1