한국산림과학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science)

  • 제104권4호
  • /
  • Pages.685-696
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2586-6613(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-6621(eISSN)
한국산림과학회 (Korean Society of Forest Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

아름다운 산림풍경 유형의 선호도 및 이미지 특성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Image and Visual Preference for the Beautiful Forest Scenery types in Korea

  • 이연희 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과) ;
  • 박찬우 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과) ;
  • 하시연 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과)
  • Lee, Yeon-Hee (Division of Forest Welfare, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Park, Chan-Woo (Division of Forest Welfare, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Ha, Si-Yeon (Division of Forest Welfare, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 투고 : 2015.09.29
  • 심사 : 2015.10.26
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국립공원의 아름다운 풍경사진을 모집단으로 분류한 22개의 아름다운 산림풍경 유형을 유형별 사진의 매수 비율과 인문자원 유형의 제외 등을 통해 선발한 10개의 풍경유형에 대한 선호경향 도출과 이미지 분석을 위해 실시되었다. 풍경유형의 선호도 평가는 편차치(Z척도)와 일대비교법을 사용하였고, 풍경유형의 이미지 분석은 SD법을 사용하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 편차치와 일대비교법에 의한 풍경유형의 선호도 평가 결과, 각 풍경유형의 요소 및 특성이 다름에도 불구하고 대체로 유사한 경향을 나타내어 평가 결과의 일관성을 확인할 수 있었다. 분석 결과, 임내풍경, 계곡과 바위와 같은 풍경에 대한 선호도가 높게 나타났고, 다음으로 능선 풍경, 기암봉우리의 암릉, 폭포와 절벽 풍경에 대한 선호도가 높았다. 한편 고사목 군락의 풍경은 가장 낮게 평가되었다. 둘째, SD법에 의한 풍경유형의 이미지 평가 결과, 요인 1 '신비로운 매력', 요인 2 '화려한 색감', 요인 3 '생동감 다양함'으로 구분되었다. 각 요인에 대한 풍경유형의 분포를 살펴보면 '신비로운 매력'의 이미지는 능선 풍경으로부터, '화려한 색감'의 이미지는 색으로 표현되는 계절감으로부터, '생동감 다양함'의 이미지는 물과 단풍, 기암봉우리의 동적이고 다양한 변화로부터 기인한 것으로 확인되었다.

This study intends to evaluate visual preference and image for 10 types of forest sceneries which have own distinct characteristics without overlapping each other among 22 types of beautiful forest sceneries based on Korea National Parks. Z scale and paired comparison methods were used to analyze visual preference for forest scenery, and SD scale method was also adopted to assess visual image for forest scenery. Experiments were conducted with 3 different university students groups. The results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the evaluation results of Z scale (N=70) and paired comparison (N=64) methods show similar visual preference for different types of forest scenery. 'Scenery inside forests' and 'valley and rock' sceneries have the highest level of preference, and 'panorama of ridges', 'ridge of curious rock peaks', and 'waterfall and cliff' also have relatively higher preference level than others. However, 'community of dead trees' has the lowest preference in forest sceneries. Second, the factor analysis outputs of the image scores for beautiful forest scenery types by SD scale (N=66) show 3 factors of 'mysterious charm', 'colorful sense', and 'vividness/variety'. Examined the variables of forest scenery types for each factor, the image of 'mysterious charm' is based on the sceneries of mountain ridges, the image of 'colorful sense' is focused on the sceneries of color-expressed sense of the season, and the image of 'vividness/variety' is based on the sceneries of waterscape and curious rock peaks.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arthur, L.M. 1977. Predicting Scenic Beauty of Forest Environment : some empirical tests. Forest Science 23(2): 151-160.
  2. Choi, K.S. 2004. Wisdom and Life from Nature. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 22(4) : 133-138.
  3. Daniel, T.C. and Boster, R.S. 1976. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service. USA. pp. 66.
  4. Hong, K.A. 2003. Effect of Fiber Cross-sectional Type on the Aesthetic Properties od Woven Fabrics. Ph. D. Dissertation. Soongsil University.
  5. Im, S.B. 1987. A Study on the Quantitative Measurement of Perceived Visual Quality: Test of the SBE Method. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 15(2): 91-100.
  6. Karjalainen, E. and Tyrväinen, L. 2002. Visualization in Forest Landscape Preference Research: a Finnish Perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00244-4
  7. Kim, E.I., Baek, J.S. and Seo, S.C. 1998. Comparison of Sight-psychological Effect of Open and Closed Landscape on Open Spaces. Korea Society People Plants and Environment 1(1): 88-95.
  8. Korea Forest Service 2012. A Practical Guideling for Korean Forest Landscape in Planning and Design. Korea Forest Service. Daejeon. pp. 926.
  9. Laumann, K., Garling, T., and Stormark, K.M. 2001. Rating Scale Measures of Restorative Components of Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0179
  10. Lohr, V.I. and Pearson-Mims, C.H. 2006. Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environment and Behavior 38: 667-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506287355
  11. Lee, C.H. 2001. A Study on the Evaluation Method of Product Design: with emphasis on the design decision-making in the organization. Master's thesis. Kookmin University.
  12. Lee, J.H., Shin, W.S., Yeon, P.S., and Yoo, R.H. 2009. The Influence of Forest Scenes on Psychophysiological Responses. The Korean Forest Society 98(1): 88-93.
  13. Lee, S.H. 2006. Emotion-Improving Effects of the Index of Greenness Focusing on Fascination Model and Restorative Environment Model. Ph.D. Dissertation. Chungang University.
  14. Lee, Y.H., Park, C.W., and Kim, J.J. 2013. The Types and Characteristics of Beautiful Forest Scenery in Korea. Korea Planners Association 48(7): 55-70.
  15. Lee, Y.H., Park, C.W., and Kim, J.J. 2014. Effects of Visual Stimulus with Forest Scenery Types on Psychological and Physiological Status of Human. Korean Society for Peopel, Plants and Environment 17(1): 65-71. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2014.17.1.065
  16. Min, B.C. 2010. Application of Human Ergonomics. Kyobomungo. Seoul. pp. 357.
  17. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., and Tannenbaum, P.H. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois. USA. pp. 342.
  18. Park, C.W. 1993. A Study on the Evaluation of Inside of Forest Scenery of Cryptomeria Japonica Plantation. Ph. D. Dissertation. Niigata University.
  19. Song, J.J. 2012. Statistical Analysis by Using SPSS/AMOS. 21seagisa. Gyeonggi-do. pp. 472.
  20. Ulrich, R.S. 1984. View Through a Window May Influence Recovery From Surgery. Science 224(4647): 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
  21. Ulrika, A. and Grahn, P. 2004. A Garden at Your Workplace May Reduce Stress. In: Dilani, A, ed. Design and Health III: Health Promotion through Environmental Design. Research Centre for Design and health. Sweden. pp. 147-157.