DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Possibility of establishment of a tree nursery at Saemangeum Reclaimed Land and Classification of 36 Landscape Trees Based on Salt Tolerance

새만금 간척지에서 36종 조경수의 양묘 가능성 검증과 내염성 분류

  • Received : 2015.09.29
  • Accepted : 2015.11.12
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the possibility of establishing a tree nursery at Saemangeum reclaimed land and to classify landscape trees based on the salt tolerance. A tree nursery (2.0 ha) was made in Gunsan Okgu area in 2012 with underground drain lines on the reclaimed land established in 2010. Salt content of the nursery soil within the 60 cm depth in 2013 was 5.13 dS/m and 8.20 dS/m for the pre-desalinated and non-desalinated lands, respectively. Thirty-six woody plant species (22 tree species and 14 shrub species at ages of 1 to 4) with a total of 3,943 individuals were planted in early April, 2013 and their growth performance was monitored until September of the same year. The average survival rate of the transplanted plants was 71.4% in late September, suggesting the high possibility of establishing a tree nursery at the reclaimed land. Based on the survival rate and tree vigor (amount of healthy leaves and crown development), the following 17 species with some salt tolerance were classified into three groups: "salt tolerant group" (3 species, Tamarix chinensis, Cudrania tricuspidata, Ilex serrata), "recommended group" (5 species, Pinus thunbergii, Albizia julibrissin, Ligustrum obtusifolium, Rosa rugosa, Pleioblatus pygmaeus), "plantable group" (9 species, Zelkova serrata, Hibiscus syriacus, Elaeagnus umbellata, Sorbus alnifolia, Sophora japonica, Metasequoia glyptostroboides, Quercus acutissima, Ulmus parvifolia, Robinia pseudoacacia). Seven tree species that had been adapted to the reclaimed land for three to four years before being transplanted to new reclaimed land in Gunsan Okgu area showed average survival rate of 98%, suggesting that pre-conditioned trees would survive well in the reclaimed land.

본 연구는 새만금간척지에서 원지반에 묘포장을 조성할 수 있는지를 검증하고, 내염성수종을 선발하기 위해 실시하였다. 2010년 조성한 군산시 옥구지역 간척지 원지반토에 2012년 2.0 ha의 묘포장을 조성하고 암거배수를 설치했다. 토양 염도는 토심 60 cm이내에서 2010년 4월 평균 35.2 dS/m이었으나, 2013년도에는 강우제염지역에서 5.13 dS/m, 미제염지역에서 8.20 dS/m로 줄었다. 2013년 4월초 1~4년생에 해당하는 36종(22종 교목과 14종 관목)의 조경수 총 3,943본을 이식하였다. 36종 수목의 첫해 가을 생존율은 평균 71.3%로서 간척지에서 양묘가 가능했다. 봄부터 가을까지 주기적으로 조사한 항목 중에서 묘고, 근원경, 잎 길이, 수관폭, 엽록소함량은 내염성을 판정하는 데 활용하지 못했다. 대신 다양한 수종에 공통된 기준으로 생장상태와 내염성을 상호 비교할 수 있는 항목은 신초 생장량, 생존율, 수세(엽량, 가지 고사와 수관 형성 상태) 뿐이었다. 생존율과 수세를 근거로 하여 수종별로 내염성을 최종적으로 판단하였는데, 생존율이 90% 이상이면서 수세가 매우 양호한 3종(위성류, 꾸지뽕나무, 낙상홍)은 "내염성수종"으로 분류하였다. 생존율이 80~89%이면서 수세가 양호한 5종(곰솔, 자귀나무, 쥐똥나무, 해당화, 난쟁이조릿대)은 "간척지 권장수종"으로 분류하였다. 생존율이 70~79%이면서 수세가 보통수준인 9종(느티나무, 무궁화, 보리수나무, 팥배나무, 회화나무, 메타세쿼이아, 상수리나무, 참느릅나무, 아까시나무)는 "간척지 식재가능수종"으로 분류하였다. 원지반에 원지반토, 준설토, 산림토로 50 cm, 혹은 100 cm 성토를 실시한 시험에서는 원지반토(9.95 dS/m)에서 곰솔의 생존율이 50%로 가장 낮고, 준설토(8.45 dS/m)에서 89%, 산림토(0.9 dS/m)에서 95%로 가장 높았다. 김제 광활지역 간척지에서 3~4년간 양묘한 7개 수종을 옥구지역 원지반토에 이식하였는데, 평균 98.2%의 생존율과 양호한 수세를 보여 이미 간척지 환경에 적응한 개체는 내염성을 가지게 됨을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agriculture and Rural Development Department. 2001. Salt Tolerance of Plants. Agriculture and Rural Development Department, Alberta, Canada. Http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptcods.nsf/all/agdex3303.
  2. Baek, S.J. 2012. Soil salinity and salt spray drift tolerance of native trees for ecological planting: In the case of Suncheon Bay, Jeollanam-do. Sunchon National University Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Korea. Dec. 2012. pp. 69.
  3. Byun, J.K. 2004. Soil environmental change and growth of transplanted trees by soil covering depths in coastal reclaimed land. Konkuk University Ph. D. thesis, Dec. 2004. Korea. pp. 183.
  4. Choe, I.H., Hwang, K.H., and Lee, K.J. 2002. Injuries of landscape trees and causes in the reclaimed seaside areas. Korea Journal of Environmental Ecology 16: 10-21.
  5. Choi, M.B. 2003. Selection of tolerant tree species to salt and sea wind: With special reference to the south of western sea areas of Korea. Journal of Korea Institute of Forest Recreation Welfare 7(3): 57-66.
  6. Hanson, B., Grattan, S.R., and Fulton, A. 1993. Agricultural salinity and drainage. A handbook for water managers. University of California, Davis, California, USA.
  7. Honam Agricultural Research Institute. 2006. Native Plants in Saemangeum Watershed. Honam Agricultural Research Institute. pp. 156.
  8. Kim, D.G. 2010a. Soil salinity and salt spray drift tolerance of native trees on the coastal windbreaks in the South Sea, Korea. Korea Journal of Environmental Ecology. 24: 14-25.
  9. Kim, D.G. 2010b. Native tree species of tolerance to saline soil and salt spray drift at the coastal forests in the West Sea, Korea. Korea Journal of Environmental Ecology 24: 209-221.
  10. Kim, K.N. 2014. A study on ecological tree planting model in the coastal reclaimed land: Focused on the native plants selection in a southern coastal area facing the western sea. Sangji University Ph.D. Thesis, Dept of Applied Plant Sciences. Dec. 2014. Korea. pp. 118.
  11. KMA(Korea Meteorological Administration). 2015. http://www.kma.go.kr/weather/observation/currentweather.jsp.
  12. Kwon, J.O. and Han, I.C. 2009. Selection of the appropriate species on the Incheon reclaimed land. Incheon Development Institute Report 2009-42, Korea. pp. 88.
  13. Lee, K.J. 2015. Arbormedicine. Seoul National University Press. pp. 446.
  14. Lee, K.J. and Lee, S.J. 2013. Landscape Tree Management Technique. 2nd edition. Seoul National University Press, Korea. pp. 459.
  15. Lee, K.J., Yoo, S.H., Park, S.W., Lee, S.J., Suriyapananont, V., and Namuco, L.O. 2008. Effects of 2004-Tsunami on the changes from 2005 to 2006 in salinity of soil profiles and groundwater wells and on mortality of garden fruit trees in Maldives. Forest Science and Technology 4: 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2008.9656333
  16. Ministry of Environment. 2010. A study on the ecological network establishment in Saemangeum. Ministry of Environment. pp. 231.
  17. Miyamoto, S., Martines, I., Padilla, M., and Portillo, A. 2004. Landscape Plant Lists for Salt Tolerance Assessment. Texas A & M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center at El Paso, and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. David Ornelas, El Paso Water Utilities. http://plantanswers.com/Landscape_Plants_List_for_salt_Tolerance_Assessment. pdf.
  18. Morton Arboritum. 2015. ttp://www.mortonarb.org/tree-plantadvice/ article/845/salt-tolerant-trees-and-shrbus.html
  19. National Institute of Crop Science. 2015. home page. http:// www.nics.go.kr
  20. Park, P.S. 2007. A consultation Report on tree planting and species selection for Taean Industrial City construction. Dept. of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea. pp. 45.
  21. The State of Queensland. 2011. Salinity management handbook. Second edition. Department of Environment and Resource Management, The State of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. pp. 172.
  22. Wu, L. and Dodge, L. 2005. Landscape Plant Salt Tolerance Selection Guide for Recycled Water Irrigation. A Special Report for the Elevenia J. Slosson Endowment Fund, University of California, Davis; article, pp. 40.

Cited by

  1. A Study of Effects of Ilex serrata Thunb Extracts vol.29, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2016.29.6.946
  2. Effects of NaCl on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Synurus deltoides(Aiton) Nakai vol.52, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2018.52.2.55
  3. Initial Survival Analysis of Pinus thunbergii and Quercus serrata Tree Belts in the Saemangeum Reclaimed Land vol.53, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2019.53.5.51