참고문헌
- Committee for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Choi YM, Chun SS, Han HD, Hwang JH, Hwang KJ, et al. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2009. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2013;56:353-61. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2013.56.6.353
- Ha JO. Thirty years of IVF in Korea: the role and responsibility of experts. J Korean Hist Sci Soc 2014;36:63-102.
- Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004;19: 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh028
- Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1492-508. e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.018
- Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2004;82 Suppl 1:S1-2.
- Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2006;86:S51-2.
- Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013;99:44-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.038
- Lee GH, Song HJ, Lee KS, Choi YM. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2010. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2015;42:8-13. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2015.42.1.8
- Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford S, Anderson JE, Folger SG, Jamieson DJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance: United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013;62:1-24.
- Stern JE, Cedars MI, Jain T, Klein NA, Beaird CM, Grainger DA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Fertil Steril 2007;88:275-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.016
- Dickey RP. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1554-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.112
- Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, Erb K, D'Hooghe T, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHREdagger. Hum Reprod 2014;29:2099-113. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu175
- Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2007. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2010;53:1052-77. https://doi.org/10.5468/kjog.2010.53.12.1052
- Assisted Reproductive Technology Committee, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2008. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54:741-63. https://doi.org/10.5468/KJOG.2011.54.12.741
피인용 문헌
- Association between ambient air pollution and pregnancy rate in women who underwent IVF vol.33, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey076
- What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, vol.28, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00404-2