DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of crab apples for apple production in high-density apple orchards

  • Kwon, Soon-Il (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Yoo, Jingi (Department of Horticultural Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Jinwook (Department of Horticultural Science, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Moon, Yong-Sun (Department of Horticulture and Life Science, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Choi, Cheol (Department of Horticultural Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Hee Young (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong Hoon (Planning and Coordination Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Chang Kil (Department of Horticultural Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kang, In-Kyu (Department of Horticultural Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2015.09.15
  • Accepted : 2015.09.21
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Crab apple cultivars, 'Maypole', 'Tuscan', and 'Manchurian', were evaluated as potential pollinizers of major apple cultivars, 'Fuji', 'Hongro', and 'Tsugaru', cultivated in high-density apple orchard systems. Numerous cultivar characteristics, including blooming time, pollen germination, fruit set, disease and pest resistance, and self-incompatibility, were examined. The blooming times of both 'Maypole' and 'Tuscan' ranged from April 19 to May 5, which was 2-4 days earlier than those of the major commercial apple cultivars. PCR analysis did not reveal the presence of any of the S-alleles (S1, S3, S7, or S9) identified in major commercial apple cultivars. In addition, the percentage of the fruit set was high after trees were artificially fertilized with crab apple pollen. Artificially cross-pollinated fruits were of similar or higher quality than open-pollinated fruits. They also demonstrated resistance to apple blotch, sooty blotch, and fly speck. The results indicate that the two crab apples, 'Maypole' and 'Tuscan' would be potential candidates for pollinizers of major apple cultivars in Korea. Use of the pollen of these crap apples in commercial production will improve fruit quality and promote sustainable and robust fruit production.

Keywords

References

  1. Broothaerts W (2003) New findings in apple S-genotype analysis resolve previous confusion and request the re-numbering of some S-allele. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:703-714 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1120-0
  2. Broothaerts W, Van Nerum I, Keulemans J (2004) Update on and review of the incompatibility (S-) genotypes of apple cultivars. HortScience 39:943-947
  3. Choi C, Tao R, Andersen RL (2002) Identification of self-incompatibility alleles and pollen incompatibility groups in sweet cherry by PCR based s-allele typing and controlled pollination. Euphytica 123:9-20 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014403802677
  4. Church RM, Williams RR, Andrews L (1983) Comparison of flowering dates and pollen released characteristics of several dessert and ornamental Malus cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. 58: 349-353
  5. Crassweller RM, Ferree DC, Nichols LP (1980) Flowering crab apples, a potential pollinizers for commercial apple cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105:475-477
  6. Florin R (1927) Pollen production and incompatibility in apples and pears. Mem. Hort. N.Y. 3:87-118
  7. Dennis Jr F (2003) Flowering, pollination and fruit set and development. In: Ferree D.C., I.J. Warrington (Ed), Apples, Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK, pp. 153-166
  8. Gothard J (1994) The use of crab apples as pollinizers in apple production. International ornamental crabapple society bulletin. Malus 8:3-8
  9. Ha YM, Shim KK (1995) Selection of new crabapple cultivars as pollinizers for apple orchard. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 36: 281-291
  10. Kang IK, Lee GJ, Kim MJ, Kwon SI, Paek PY, Choi DG (2002) Selection of crab apples as pollinizers for major apple cultivars in apple orchard. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 20:330-334
  11. Kang IK (2004) Selection of crab apple as pollinizers for 'Hongro' apple cultivar. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 22:212-215
  12. Kim JH, Yiem MS, Shin YU (1979) The selection of crab apple cultivars as pollinators for single cultivar commercial apple orchards. RDA J. Agric. Sci. 21:37-44
  13. Paek SG (1977) Evaluation of ornamental Malus species and cultivars as pollinators for single cultivar commercial apple orchards. Thesis of Cornell University. p.83
  14. Shogo M, Takahiro E, Tsutomu M, Hiromisu K (2008) Effect of distance from early flowering pollinizers 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo' on 'Fuji' fruit set. Sci. Hort. 117:151-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.025
  15. Way RD, Paek SG (1976) Pollination arrangements in new apple plantings. N.Y. State Agri. Exp. Sta. (Geneva) Special Report No. 3
  16. Williams RR (1967) A pollinator system for the single variety Cox's Orange Pippin orchard. Long Ashton Res. Sta. Rpt. for 1966:112-114
  17. Williams RR (1970) Factors affecting pollination in fruit trees. p.193-208. In: Luckwill. L.C. and C.V. Cutting(eds.). Physiology of tree crop. Academic Press. New York and London
  18. Williams RR, Church RM (1983) Growth and flowering of ornamental Malus pollinators in apple orchards. J. Hort. Sci. 58:337-342