DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Objective method of risk assessment based on RAM analysis for warship

함정 분야의 RAM분석 기반 위험평가 방안

  • Received : 2015.07.07
  • Accepted : 2015.08.13
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study suggests a method of risk assessment based on RAM analysis in order to reduce the subjectivity. Methods: RAM analysis is used to assessment risk consequence(RC) and risk likelihood(RL). Result: The calculated result of the product, which has higher risk assessment, shows lower MTBF system. Conclusion: Risk assessment based on objective database will provide objectivity and effective quality control.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Mooyoung. 2011." A Study on Determining Method of Integrated Logistics Support Elements in Defense system Test Development Phase."2011 Autumn Conference of Koran Institute of Industrial Engineers, 996-1001.
  2. Kim, Jungho et al. 2011. "The Scientific Method of Risk Identification using FMECA."2011 Spring Conference of Koran Institute of Industrial Engineers, 264-270.
  3. Sohn, Jungmok, Chang, Chungmoo, and Won youdong. 2012. "A Case Study of RAM Analysis Using Field Data:Focusing on Korean Warship." Journal of the Korea Contents Association 12:395-412.
  4. Defence Acquisition Program Administration. 2009. Practice Guideline for Integrated Logistics Support Development.
  5. US DoD. 2005. DoD guide for achieving Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability.
  6. Shin, Sangsik, Lee, Kilsoo, and Cho Heunggi. 2013. "An Objective Method of Risk Assessment Based on Stochastic Modelling."Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 41:465-474. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.3.465
  7. Yun, Wonyoung et al. 2011. "Simulation Modeling for RAM Analysis of a Searching System." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 39:353-363.
  8. Woo, Heesung, Jung, Sanggyu, and Lee, Changwoo. 2013. "A Study on the Evaluation Criteria Development for Selecting Intensive Management Items and Its Application Plan."Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 41:475-486. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.3.475