DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Adoption and Complementarity of Production Technology Bundles in Horticultural Greenhouse

원예시설 결합기술의 수용효과와 보완성 분석

  • Choi, Don-Woo (Gyongsangbuk-Do Agricultural Research & Extension Services) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Kyun (Department of Agricultural Economics, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2015.07.15
  • Accepted : 2015.09.11
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effect of adoption and complementarity of production technology bundles in horticultural greenhouse - more than 10m vinyl greenhouse ($T_1$), polyolefin film ($T_2$), winding branch ventilation ($T_3$), and more than 15 ounce lagging cover ($T_4$). The results are as follows: First, only using $T_1$, only using $T_2$, only using $T_3$, only using $T_4$, using $T_1$ and $T_3$, and using $T_1$ and $T_4$, have a higher net return. Second, when $T_3$ is used, $T_1$ and $T_2$ are complementary. Third, $T_1$ and $T_3$ are always complementary. Fourth, when $T_2$ and $T_3$ are not used, $T_1$ and $T_4$ are complementary. The results of this paper could contribute to government's technology diffusion policies and subsequent studies.

이 논문의 목적은 비닐하우스의 결합기술에 대한 수용효과와 보완성을 분석하는 것이다. 분석대상 기술은 10m 이상 하우스, polyolefin 필름, 권취환기, 15온스 이상 보온덮개 등 네 가지이며, 분석결과는 다음과 같이 요약된다. 첫째, 10m 이상 하우스, PO필름, 권취환기, 15온스 이상 보온덮개의 기술들이 단독으로 수용되었을 경우, 그리고 10m 이상 하우스와 권취환기의 기술결합, 10m 이상 하우스와 15온스 이상 보온덮개의 기술결합에서 순수익이 증가한다. 둘째, 권취환기를 활용하고 있는 경우, 10m 이상 하우스와 PO필름을 수용한다면 보완적 효과를 가져 올 수 있다. 셋째, 10m 이상 하우스와 권취환기는 항상 보완성을 가지는 조합으로 분석된다. 넷째, 10m 이상 하우스와 15온스 이상 보온덮개 기술조합은 PO필름과 권취환기를 모두 활용하지 않는 경우 보완적이다. 본 연구의 결과는 정부의 기술보급 정책에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. P.M. Romer, "Endogenous Technical Change", Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-102, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261725
  2. S. Rosen, "Specialization and Human Capital", Journal of Labor Economics, 1(1), 43-49, 1983. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/298003
  3. W.E. Huffman, "Human Capital: Education and Agriculture", Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 1(1), 333-381, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(01)10010-1
  4. L. Yu, T. Hurley, J. Kliebenstein, P. Orazem, "A Test for Complementarities Among Multiple Technologies that Avoids the Curse of Dimensionality", Economics Letters, 116(3), 354-357, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.023
  5. M. Caswell, D. Zilberman, "The Choices of Irrigation Technologies in California", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(2), 224-234, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240673
  6. S.J. Jo, P.S. Park, "Labor-saving and Cost-down Effects of New Technology Introduction in Soybean Farms", Korea Soybean Digest, 18(2), 82-100, 2001.
  7. A.R. Lee, H.S. Shin, D.G. Seo, "Study on the Satisfaction and Economic Results of Farm Household about Introduction of New Agricultural Technology-Case Study: Fine Water Sprayer for Fruit Trees-", Journal of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, 23(4), 1-17, 2011.
  8. S. Athey, S. Stern, "An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarity in Organizational Design", NBER Working Paper No.6600. 1998.
  9. E. Caroli, J. Van Reenen, "Skill-biased Organizational Change? Evidence from a Panel of British and French Establishments", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1449-1492, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265624
  10. T.F. Bresnahan, E. Brynjolfsson, L.M. Hitt, "Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339-76, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399526
  11. H. An, "Complementarities in Production Technologies: An Empirical Analysis of the Dairy Industry", selected paper for presentation at Agricultural and Applied Economics Association's annual meeting, 2012.
  12. D.W. Choi, D.C. Kim, J.E. Lee, "Technologies Relationships Change Analysis due to Extension of Anti-disaster Greenhouses in Oriental Melon", Proceedings of the KSAM & KSBEC 2015 Spring Conference, 359-360, 2015.
  13. P. Milgrom, J. Roberts, "The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization", American Economic Review, 80(3), 511-528, 1990.
  14. M. Mazzanti, R. Zoboli, "Complementarities, Firm Strategies and Environmental Innovations: Empirical Evidence for a District Based Manufacturing System", Environmental Sciences, 5(1), 17-40, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15693430701859638
  15. M. Carree, B. Lokshin, R. Belderbos, "A Note on Testing for Complementarity and Substitutability in the Case of Multiple Practices", Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 263-269, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0189-8
  16. Statistics Korea, Census of Agriculture, 2010.
  17. Rural Development Administration, Manual and Guide for Agricultural Income Survey, 2011.