한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제16권8호
  • /
  • Pages.5223-5231
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 자율성지지와 자기조절 동기가 학습성과에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Autonomy Support and Self-Determined Motivation on Learning Outcomes among College Students

  • 투고 : 2015.07.08
  • 심사 : 2015.08.06
  • 발행 : 2015.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 대학생의 자율성 지지, 자기조절 동기와 학습인식 즉 학습성과의 정도와 이들 요인간의 상관관계를 파악하고, 학습성과에 영향을 주는 요인이 무엇인지를 확인하는데 있다. 연구대상은 전남과 대전에 위치한 대학에 재학 중인 대학생 231명을 대상으로 편의 추출하였다. 자료는 SPSS 21.0을 이용하여 분석하였으며 그 결과 자율성 지지는 자기조절동기의 확인적 조절 동기, 내적 조절 동기, 학습인식의 학습결과와 학습과정과 정의 상관관계가 있음을 확인하였다. 자기조절동기의 외적 조절 동기는 의무조절 동기와 정의 상관관계가 있었고 의무 조절 동기는 확인적 조절동기와 정의 상관관계가 있었다. 확인적 조절 동기는 내적조절동기, 학습결과, 학습과정과 정의 상관관계가 있었다. 내적 조절 동기는 학습결과, 학습 인식과 정의 상관관계를 보였고 학습결과는 학습인식과 정적 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 대상자의 학습 인식에 영향을 주는 요인을 확인하기 위하여 회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 자율성지지, 의무적 조절 동기, 확인적 조절동기가 학습인식에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 자율성 지지와 자기결정동기가 대학생의 학업수행을 강화하는 주요한 요인임을 시사한다.

The purpose of this study was to examine relations in autonomy support, self-determined motivation, and learning outcomes among college students. The subjects of this study were 231 college students in Jeonnam Province and Daejeon city, sampled by convenience sampling. The result of this study is as follows: First, perceived autonomy support had a significant direct positive effect on identified and intrinsic motivation. Also perceived autonomy support had a significant direct positive effect on learning outcomes and processes. Second, external had a significant positive effect on duty motivation and duty motivation had a direct positive effect on identified duty. In addition to identified motivation had a significant positive effect on intrinsic motivation, learning outcomes and processes. Third, intrinsic motivation had positively influenced on learning outcomes and processes. As the last of the findings, perceived autonomy support, duty motivation and identified motivation had significant effects on learning outcomes and processes. These results imply that perceived autonomy and self-determination motivation is important to enhance academic performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. B. Shen, N. McCaughtry. J. Martin, M. Fahlman. Effects of teacher autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 80(1), pp. 44-53, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599528
  2. E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human need and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, pp. 227-268, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  3. J. Reeve, E. Bolt, Y. Cai. Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, pp. 537-548, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537
  4. R. M. Ryan, E. L. Deci. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, pp. 68-78, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  5. W. S. Grolnick, R. M. Ryan. Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, pp. 143-154, 1989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143
  6. A. H. Kim, J. E. Cha, D. S. Lee, I. H. Lim, H. Y. Tack, Y. N. Song. Influence of parents' autonomy support on elementary students' self-regulated learning efficacy: The mediating effect of self-determined motivation. The Journal of Korean Education, 35(4), pp. 3-24, 2008.
  7. A. E. Black, E. L. Deci. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education. 84(6), pp. 740-756, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740:: AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
  8. W. S. Sohn, J. H. Bae. Relationships of mothers' versus teachers' autonomy support with student's academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 19(3), pp. 253-272, 2014. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2014.19.3.004
  9. J. Y. Lee, J. H. Ha, S. H. Jeon. The effects of parents' interacting modes in achievement settings on adolescents' expectancy for future success and academic achievement: The roles of self-esteem and depression as mediators. Journal of Korean Educational Psychology, 20(4), pp. 873-890, 2006.
  10. P. D. Umbach, S. R. Porter. How do academic departments impact student satisfaction?: Understanding the contextual effects of departments. Research in Higher Education, 43(2), pp. 209-234, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014471708162
  11. C. G. Sohn, Y. T. Kim. A study on the difference of result to variables related to students' evaluation of teaching in university. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(2), pp. 1-24, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2167/eri431.0
  12. H. J. Shin, H. R. Min. Effects of students' majors on the relationship between perceived learning experiences and course satisfaction of undergraduate students. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), pp. 49-72, 2009.
  13. G. C. Williams, E. L. Deci. Internalization of biopsychological value by medical students: A test self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70, pp. 767-779, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
  14. H. K. Kim. The effects of teachers' autonomy support on self-regulational motivation of middle school students in physical education class[thesis]. Incheon: University of Incheon. pp. 1-57, 2009.
  15. A. Y. Kim. Validation of taxonomy of academic motivation based on the self-determination theory. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 16(4), pp. 169-187, 2002.
  16. J. G. Park. Structural relationships between perceived dance teachers' autonomy support, learning orientations, intrinsic regulations, and intention for class. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 49(4), pp. 373-385, 2010.
  17. B. H. Park. Verification of relational model of autonomy support, psychological needs, self-regulative motivation and consequences in physical education. Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Physical Education. 17(4), pp. 127-149, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2013.8.1.127
  18. J. S. Chung, J. H. Lee. Path analysis among perceived autonomy support, self-determination motivation and academic performance in a cyber university. The Journal of Educational Information and Media. 18(3), pp. 365-387, 2012.
  19. N. Ntoumanis. A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, pp. 444-453, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.444
  20. M. Standage, J. L. Duda, N. Ntoumanis. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, pp. 97-110, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97
  21. Y. J. Oh, Y. Jin. Mediating effects of basic psychological needs on the relationships between perceived autonomy support from teacher and peers and intrinsic motivation in dance. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 23(2), pp. 87-101, 2012.
  22. D. H. Ahn. Influences of adolescents' beliefs regarding intelligence, and parents' and teachers' autonomy support on their perceived competence. Studies on Korean Youth. 24(1), pp. 103-126, 2013.
  23. J. Y. Kim, A. Y. Kim. Teachers' conditional regard, autonomy support, and elementary students' self-determined motivation as predictors of academic engagement and achievement. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 28(2), pp. 251-268, 2014.
  24. K. C. Chen, S. G. Jang. Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior. 26(4), pp. 741-752, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011
  25. J. W. You, M. H. Kang. The structural relationship among social factor, psychological need factor, and motivational factor for enhancing learning engagement. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 49(4), pp. 55-85, 2011.
  26. I. S. Kim. Influence of teachers' autonomy support, motivational climate, athletic values, self-determined motivation to satisfaction of physical education class of elementary school children. The Korean Journal of Elementary Physical Education. 11(1), pp. 47-61, 2011.
  27. J. H. Im. The verification of mediating effect of self-regulation motivation and academic self-efficacy between perceived autonomy support and the student achievement of the learning[thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University. 2004.
  28. S. W. Lee. The structural relationships among perceived parents and teachers' autonomy support, goal orientation, basic psychological needs, academic achievement. The Journal of Education Research. 31(1), pp. 45-68, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1937.10880723
  29. C. Furrer, E. Skinner. Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 95(1), pp. 148-162, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
  30. H. S. Cho. The effect of teachers' autonomy support environment in physical education on students' help-seeking behaviors and class participation attitude. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 50(6), pp. 273-284, 2011.
  31. S. H. Cheon, I. S. Moon. Implementing as autonomy-supportive fitness program to facilitate students' autonomy and engagement. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 21(1), pp. 175-195, 2010.

피인용 문헌

  1. Predictive power of grit, professor support for autonomy and learning engagement on perceived achievement within the context of a flipped classroom pp.1741-2625, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418762463