DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경계반력법을 이용한 지진격리 원전구조물의 비선형 지반-구조물 상호작용 해석

Nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Seismically Isolated Nuclear Power Plant Structure using the Boundary Reaction Method

  • Lee, Eun-Haeng (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Min (Department of Marine and Civil Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (KEPCO E&C)
  • 투고 : 2014.06.09
  • 심사 : 2014.12.29
  • 발행 : 2015.01.01

초록

This paper presents a detailed procedure for a nonlinear soil-structure interaction of a seismically isolated NPP(Nuclear Power Plant) structure using the boundary reaction method (BRM). The BRM offers a two-step method as follows: (1) the calculation of boundary reaction forces in the frequency domain on an interface of linear and nonlinear regions, (2) solving the wave radiation problem subjected to the boundary reaction forces in the time domain. For the purpose of calculating the boundary reaction forces at the base of the isolator, the KIESSI-3D program is employed in this study to solve soil-foundation interaction problem subjected to vertically incident seismic waves. Wave radiation analysis is also employed, in which the nonlinear structure and the linear soil region are modeled by finite elements and energy absorbing elements on the outer model boundary using a general purpose nonlinear FE program. In this study, the MIDAS/Civil program is employed for modeling the wave radiation problem. In order to absorb the outgoing elastic waves to the unbounded soil region, spring and viscous-damper elements are used at the outer FE boundary. The BRM technique utilizing KIESSI-3D and MIDAS/Civil programs is verified using a linear soil-structure analysis problem. Finally the method is applied to nonlinear seismic analysis of a base-isolated NPP structure. The results show that BRM can effectively be applied to nonlinear soil-structure interaction problems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASCE 4-12. Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary. Draft Revision 16. ASCE; c2012.
  2. Coleman J, Jeremic B, Whittaker A. Nonlinear Time Domain Seismic Soil Structure Interaction (SSI) Analysis for Nuclear Facilities and Draft Appendix B of ASCE 4. SMiRT-22; 2013 Aug 18-23; San Francisco, CA.
  3. NUREG-xxxx. Technical consideration for seismic isolation of nuclear facilities, Draft. U.S. NRC. Feb. c2013.
  4. Wolf J. Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc.; c1985. 466p.
  5. Lysmer J, Tabatabaie-Raissi M, Tajirian F, Vahdani S, Ostadan F. SASSI: a system for analysis of soil-structure interaction-user's manual. University of California. Berkeley; c1988.
  6. Seo CG, Kim JM. Introduction to KIESSI Program for Three Dimensional Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis. Computational Structural Engineering. 2012; 25(3): 77-83.
  7. Kim JM, Choi JS, Lee JS. A New Hybrid Method for Nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2003; 7(7): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2003.7.6.001
  8. Kawamoto JD. Solution of nonlinear dynamic structural system based on a hybrid frequency-time-domain approach. Research Report R83-5, MIT, Dept. of Civil Eng., Cambridge, MA. c1983.
  9. Bernal D, Youssef A. A hybrid time frequency domain formulation for non-linear soil-structure interaction. Earthq. Eng. & Struct. Dyn. 1998; 27: 673-685. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199807)27:7<673::AID-EQE751>3.0.CO;2-3
  10. Bielak J, Loukakis K, Hisada Y, Yoshimura C. Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions. Part I: theory, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2003; 93(2): 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010251
  11. Basu U., Explicit finite element perfectly matched layer for transient three-dimensional elastic waves. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 2009; 77: 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2397
  12. Solberg JM, Hossain Q, Blink JA, Bohlen SR, Mseis G, Greenberg H. Development of a generalized methodology for soil-structure interaction analysis using nonlinear time-domain techniques. Report # LLNL-TR-635762, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. c2013.
  13. Tafazzoli N, Pisano F, Abbel JA, Kamrani B, Jeong C-G, Aldridge B, Roche R, Kammerer A, Jeremic B. The NRC ESSI simulator program current status. SMiRT-22; 2013 Aug 18-23; San Francisco, CA.
  14. LSTC, LS-DYNA user's manual, Vols. 1 & 2, Version 971 R5. c2010.
  15. Kim JM, Lee EH. Boundary reaction method for nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis. Proc. KSCE Conference. c2013.
  16. Lee GH, Hong KY, Lee EH, Kim JM. Verification of linear FE model for nonlinear SSI analysis by boundary reaction method. COSEIK J. Comput. Struct. Eng. 2014 April; 27(2): 95-102.
  17. MIDAS/Civil, http://www.midasit.com/
  18. Deek AJ, Randolph MF. Axisymmetric time domain transmitting boundaries. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE. 1994; 120(1):25-42. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:1(25)
  19. Kellezi L. Local transmitting boundaries for transient elastic analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2000; 19:533-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00029-4
  20. Liu J, Gu Y, Wang Y, Li B. Efficient procedure for seismic analysis of soil-structure interaction system. Tsinghua Science and Technology. 2006 Dec.; 11: 625-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(06)70244-9

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of the Soil-structure Interaction Effect on Seismically Isolated Nuclear Power Plant Structures vol.20, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2016.20.6.379