Journal of Nutrition and Health

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of the evaluation tool for the food safety and nutrition management education projects targeting the middle class elderly: Application of the balanced score card and the structure-process-outcome concept

중산층 노인대상 식품안전·영양관리 교육 사업 평가를 위한 도구 개발: 균형성과표와 구조·과정·성과 개념 적용

  • Chang, Hyeja (Department of Food Science & Nutrition, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoo, Hyoi (Department of Food & Nutrition, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung, Harim (Department of Food & Nutrition, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Hyesang (Department of Food & Nutrition, Andong University) ;
  • Lee, Minjune (Graduate School of Education, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Kyungeun (Department of Food & Nutrition, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Yoo, Changhee (Department of Food & Nutrition, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Choi, Junghwa (Department of Food & Nutrition, Soongeui Women's College) ;
  • Lee, Nayoung (Department of Food & Nutrition, Daejeon University) ;
  • Kwak, Tongkyung (Department of Food & Nutrition, Yonsei University)
  • 장혜자 (단국대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 유효이 (연세대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 정하림 (연세대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이혜상 (안동대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이민준 (연세대학교 교육대학원) ;
  • 이경은 (서울여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 유창희 (서울여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 최정화 (숭의여자대학 식품영양과) ;
  • 이나영 (대전대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 곽동경 (연세대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2014.10.08
  • Accepted : 2015.12.17
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop an evaluation tool for operation of food safety and nutrition education projects for middle class elderly using the concept of the balanced score card. Methods: After the draft of the evaluation tool for the elderly training projects was completed, it was revised into the questionnaire and the validity of the indicators was tested by the Delphi group. The validity of the indicators was rated using a 5-point scale. The Delphi group consisted of 26 experts in the education sector, 16 government officials, and 24 professionals of the related area in communities. The first round test was conducted from July 9 to July 17, 2012, and 45 persons responded. The second round test was conducted from July 18 to July 25 and 32 persons responded. Results: The indicators, which were answered by more than 75 percent of the experts as 'agree' (4 points), 'strongly agree' (5 point) were included as the final indicators for the evaluation tool: 28 items out of 36 in outcome perspectives, 9 items out of 12 in process perspectives, and 17 out of 20 items in structure perspectives. The score was allocated as 50 points for outcome indicators, 20 points for process indicators, and 30 points for structure indicators. Conclusion: Completion of the evaluation tool is a prerequisite to determine whether the program is effectively implemented. The monitoring tool developed in the study could be applied for identification of the most optimal delivery path for the food safety and nutrition education program, for the spread of the food safety and nutrition education program for middle class elderly.

우리나라가 고령화 사회에 진입함에 따라 노인 의료비 부담이 증가하고 있으며, 질병을 예방하고 건강 수명을 연장하기 위해서는 공적 사업의 일환으로 식품안전 영양관리 프로그램을 개발하고 이를 효과적으로 실행하는 방안이 마련되어야 한다. 본 연구는 균형성과표 (BSC: balanced score card) 개념을 적용하여 내용적으로는 고객관점, 재무관점, 학습과 성장, 내부 프로세스 관점에서 평가지표를 추출하였고, 형식면에서는 성과측면, 과정측면, 구조측면으로 구분하여 노인대상 식품안전 영양관리 교육 프로그램을 평가하는 도구를 개발하였다. 노인 대상교육 프로그램 평가도구의 초안을 개발하고, 이를 설문지로 전환하여 전문가 집단에게 평가지표에 대한 타당성 평가를 의뢰하였다. 평가지표에 대한 적합성은 1, 2차 결과를 토대로 '그렇다 (4점)', '매우 그렇다' (5점)를 선정한 전문가의 빈도 (백분율)가 75% 이상, 평균점수 3.8점 이상인 지표로 선별하였다. 델파이 그룹은 학계 전문가 26명, 중앙정부기관 16명, 지역사회 운영기관 24명으로 총 66인으로 구성하였다. 1차, 2차 평가에 모두 참여한 전문가는 총 32명의 의견을 토대로 프로그램의 평가도구를 '성과측면' 28문항, '과정측면' 9문항, '구조측면' 17문항으로 최종적으로 완성하였다. 배점은 성과지표 50점, 과정지표 20점, 구조지표 30점으로 구성된다. 노인 대상 식품안전 영양관리 교육서비스 확산을 위해서는 효과적으로 평가할 수 있는 평가 도구의 구비가 선행되어야 한다. 본 연구에서 개발한 평가 도구를 활용한다면, 노인대상으로 식품안전 및 영양관리 교육프로그램 사업을 효과적으로 실행하는지를 평가할 수 있으며, 프로그램을 가장 효율적, 효과적으로 전달할 수 있는 경로를 탐색하는데 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea. Elderly statistics data [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; [cited 2013 Sep 10]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/ portal/korea/index.action.
  2. Jeong HS, Song YM. Contributing factors to the increases in health insurance expenditures for the aged and their forecasts. Korean J Health Econ Policy 2013; 19(2): 21-38.
  3. Kim JG. The impact of family type on health behavior of elderly people. J Welf Aged 2011; 51: 35-56.
  4. Lee YN. Delivery system of dietary life safety programs of elderly. Proceedings of the 46th Korean Nutrition Society conference; 2011 Nov 11, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The third health plan 2020 in Korea [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; [cited 2011 Aug 5]. Available from: http://www.mw.go.kr/.
  6. Choi JH, Lee ES, Lee YJ, Lee HS, Chang HJ, Lee KE, Yi NY, Ahn Y, Kwak TK. Development of food safety and nutrition education contents for the elderly - by focus group interview and delphi technique -. Korean J Community Nutr 2012; 17(2): 167-181. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.2.167
  7. Lee KE, Lee NY, Park JH. Food safety knowledge and home food safety practices of home-delivered meal service recipients. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2009; 38(5): 618-625. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.5.618
  8. Kim KW. Issues and directions in developing nutrition education for older adults in Korea. J Community Nutr 2000; 2(1): 71-84.
  9. Lee YS, Kim HK. Nutritional status and cognitive status of the elderly using public health center in Ulsan. Korean J Nutr 2002; 35(10): 1070-1080.
  10. Sahyoun NR. Nutrition education for the healthy elderly population: isn't it time? J Nutr Educ Behav 2002; 34(Suppl 1): S42-S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60310-2
  11. Kang NE, Lee JY. The analysis of effect on nutrition education program for the elderly in Sung-nam area. Korean J Food Nutr 2005; 18(4): 357-366.
  12. Kim EH. A study on development of key performance indicator using BSC for public service: a case of elderly welfare service. Korean Public Adm Q 2013; 22(2): 349-374.
  13. Ko Y. Cost benefit analysis of the home visiting care for vulnerable subjects with hypertension [doctoral dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2010.
  14. Lee SJ, Lee SB. Performance measurement of the public sector from a BSC perspective: the case of PBLIS. Korea Local Adm Rev 2005; 19(2): 155-186.
  15. Seo YJ. The Development of performance evaluation tool for health promotion programs of public health centers. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2003.
  16. Kwak TK. Strategies to improve management practices on food safety and nutrition for elderly. Cheongwon: National Institute of Food and Drugs Safety Evaluation; 2011.
  17. Stawar TL, Zipple AM. Book review the book "The strategy focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment", by Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2002; 26(2): 212-213. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094560
  18. Choi SM. A review of adoptability of BSC(Balanced Scorecard) to social service organizations in Korea. Seoul City Res 2007; 8: 189-209.
  19. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harv Bus Rev 1993; 71(5): 134-147.
  20. Hasenfeld Y. Social services and welfare-to-work: prospects for the social work profession. Adm Soc Work 2000; 23(3-4): 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v23n03_11
  21. Kwak T, Chang H, Song J. Development of performance indicators based on balanced score card for school food service facilities. Korean J Community Nutr 2005; 10(6): 905-919.
  22. Mcdonald G. Quality in health promotion. Cardiff: Health Promotion Wales; 1992.
  23. Seo YJ, Jeong AS, Park TS, Lee KS. The development of a quality assessment tool for the process of health promotion programs at public health centers. Korean J Health Policy Adm 2003; 13(3): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2003.13.3.035
  24. Lee HS, Lim JH. SPSS version 16.0 manual. Paju: Beobmoonsa; 2009.
  25. Kim CL. The SAS statistics boxes: focused on statistic analysis and market research technique, 4th edition. Daejeon: Data Research, Inc.; 1994.
  26. Bae JS, Kim MH, Kim SB. Effects of nutrition education and personalized lunch service program for elderly at senior welfare center in Jeonju. Korean J Community Nutr 2013; 18(1): 65-76. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.1.65
  27. Gregoire MB. Foodservice organizations: a managerial and systems approach, 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2010.
  28. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 2007; 12(10): 1-7.
  29. Ulschak FL. Human resource development: the theory and practice of need assessment. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, Inc.; 1983.
  30. Green PJ. The content of college-level outdoor leadership course. Conference of the Northwest District Association for American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance; Spokane, WA. 1982.
  31. Sullivan GM. A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3(2): 119-120. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00075.1