디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제13권12호
  • /
  • Pages.413-422
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

존엄사에 대한 한국 중년층의 인식유형과 특성

The Subjective Perception and Characteristics of the Middle-aged on Death with Dignity

  • 신선호 (경남대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 신원식 (경남대학교 사회복지학과)
  • 투고 : 2015.10.13
  • 심사 : 2015.12.20
  • 발행 : 2015.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 존엄사에 대한 한국 중년층의 인식유형을 파악하고 그 특성을 분석함으로써 존엄사에 대한 제도마련 및 정책을 구성하는데 필요한 기초적인 자료를 제공하고자 하는 것이다. 존엄사에 관한 30개의 진술문을 가지고, 32명의 중년층을 대상으로 Q 분류를 하였다. 분석결과 존엄사에 대한 주관적인 인식유형과 그 특성은 허용형, 반대형, 제한적 허용형으로 나타났다. 허용형은 환자의 자기결정권에 의한 존엄사는 수용되어야 하며, 극심한 고통을 동반하는 환자에게 존엄사는 필요하다고 생각한다. 반대형은 존엄사가 허용되면 부당하게 죽음을 맞이하는 이들이 늘어나며, 인간의 생명경시 풍조가 만연해질 것이라고 생각한다. 제한적 허용형은 존엄사를 허용하기에 앞서 구체적인 법과 제도가 마련되어야 한다고 생각한다. 존엄사라는 주제 자체가 국민들의 온전한 합의를 이끌어낼 수 없는 것일 수 있지만, 존엄사제도 추진과정에서 국민의 의견이 반영되어야 할 것이다.

This study is to grasp fundamental data to prepare the policy about death with dignity(DwD) by grasping perception type of the middle-aged about DwD. 32 middle-ages test Q-sort with 30 statements which is related to DwD. The result of analysis shows that subjective perception types are permission type, opposition type, and limited permission type. First, 'permission type' indicates that DwD by self-determination of patients should be accepted; it is necessary to patients with extreme pain. Second, 'opposition type' insists that there will be more people dying unfairly; a trend to make light of human life could be in everywhere if DwD is permitted. Third, 'limited permission type' agrees with permitting DwD but insists on preparing specific legal system before that. The subject, DwD, itself seems not to be able to draw a complete agreement from people, but national opinions should be reflected during the process of DwD system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. The Economist, The right to die: why assisted suicide should be legal, http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21656182, 2015. 6. 27.
  2. Christian Medical & Dental Association, "Top 6 Reasons Physician-Assisted Suicide Should Not Be Legal", http://cmda.org/resources/publication/top-6-reasons-physician-assisted-suicide-should-not-be-legal, 2015. 7. 20.
  3. M. S. Kim, "A Study on Euthanasia and Death with Dignity in U.S. Constitution", Studies on Constitution, Vol. 16, pp.38-73, 2013.
  4. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Nederland http://www.minbuza.nl/english/einfo.htm. accessed by April 20 2015.
  5. J. B. Kim, "Withdrawing treatments and passive euthanasia", The Study of Criminal Law, Vol. 12, pp.153-174, 1999.
  6. B. D. Hwang, "Attitudes of Hospice Volunteers towards Death with Dignity", The Korean Journal of Health Service Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.1-14, 2011. https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2011.5.2.001
  7. J. Y. Choi and B. K. Kwon, "The Current Debates and Social Trends Regarding Euthanasia and the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Korea", Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.127-142, 2009.
  8. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Recommended the establishment of special act regarding the autonomous decisions by patients regarding the medical care for life prolongation -Announced the result of 1st discussion by the National Bioethics Committee. 2013. 7. 31.
  9. The Supreme Court, Sentence 2009Da17417 Judgement, 2009. 5. 21.
  10. J. T. Kim, K. C. Kim, D. H. Shin, H. S. Cho, J. Y. Shim and H. R. Lee, "Attitudes of medical students and housestaff toward euthanasia", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp.1494-1502, 2001.
  11. M. H. Seong, J. C. Jeon and H. J. Mo, "Nurses' Perceptions and Attitudes towards Euthanasia", Asian Oncology Nursing, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp.140-149, 2007.
  12. Government Information Agency, Report of investigation result regarding the sense and value of Korean people, Government Information Agency, 2006.
  13. J. H. Yoo, O. B. Kwon, K. K. Kim, H. C. Kang and K. H. Lee, "Analysis of attitudes on euthanasia between residents and judicial apprentices", The Korean Academy of Family Medicine, Vol. 26, pp.327-336, 2005.
  14. H. M. Son, "Perceptions and Attitudes of Nurses toward Euthanasia", The Korean journal of fundamentals of nursing, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.309-316, 2004.
  15. J. Coggon, "Could the Right to Die with Dignity Represent a New Right to Die in English Law?", Medical Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.219-237, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwl002
  16. S. J. Hwang and W. S. Shin. "The Subjective Perception Types of the Elderly on Senior Sexuality", The Journal of Human Studies, Vol. 35, pp.207-234, 2014.
  17. D. Thomasma and T. Kushner(eds.), Birth to Death: Science and Bioethics, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  18. Y. H. Yoon, "Lawful and institutional device for Death of Dignity", Research Institute for Healthcare Policy Korean Medical Association, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp.101-106, 2008.
  19. H. K. Lee, "Eine historische Interpretation uber Euthanasie und juristische Beurteilungen", Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.156-164, 2007.
  20. I. Dowbiggin, translated by Y. K. Shin, A concise history of euthanasia: life, death, God, and medicine, Seomdol Publishing, 2007.
  21. J. C. Reil, Entwurf einer allgemeinen Therapie, Halle, 1816.
  22. K. W. Jeong, "Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment", Korean Journal of Health Law, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.1-52, 2005.
  23. S. Brown, Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.
  24. J. S. Lee, "A Study on the Death with Dignity", Law Review, 37: 171-195, 2010.
  25. K. B. Cho, "The issues and problem of legalization on death with dignity, Issue and Points", National Assembly Research Service, 555: 01-04, 2012.
  26. F. N. Kerlinger, Foundation of Behavioral Research, NY: CBS College Publishing, 1986.