DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative seed morphology of the tribe Alsineae (Caryophyllaceae) in Korea and its taxonomic implications

한국산 Alsineae (석죽과) 종자의 형태비교 및 분류학적 유용성

  • Song, Jun-Ho (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Mi (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Ok, Min-Kyoung (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hong, Suk-Pyo (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University)
  • 송준호 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 김주미 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 옥민경 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 홍석표 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과)
  • Received : 2015.10.05
  • Accepted : 2015.12.09
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

The seed morphology of 25 taxa (8 genera) of Alsineae (Alsinoideae, Caryophyllaceae) in Korea was examined using stereo (SM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in order to evaluate their diagnostic values and taxonomic implications. Circular, comma-shaped, ellipsoid, ovate, pyriform, reniform, and sub-circular seed shapes were identified. The seeds of the examined taxa range from 0.28 to 4.10 mm in length and from 0.33 to 3.10 mm in width; the smallest one was found in Sagina japonica, while the largest was in Honkenya peploides var. major. A hilar appendage was found in Cerastium, Honkenya, Moehringia, and strophioles were only observed in the genus Moehringia. Based on the examination of epidermal cells of the seed surface, four micromorphological types can be distinguished, viz., the colliculate-papillate (Col-Pap), colliculate-columellate (Col-Cll), colliculate-simple (Col-Sim), and smooth (Sm) types. Descriptions of the testa shape, margin, and the degree of elevation of the anticlinal cell walls, and the outer periclinal cell walls are summarized for the tribe. Taxonomic implications of the seed micromorphological characters were also discussed, in comparison with an earlier taxonomic system.

한국산 Alsineae (Alsinoideae, 석죽과) 8속 25분류군 종자의 형태학적 형질에 대한 식별형질로서의 가치와 분류학적 의미를 평가하기 위해 해부현미경(SM)과 주사전자현미경(SEM)을 통해 관찰하고 자세히 기재하였다. 종자의 외형은 원형, 쉼표형, 타원형, 난형, 양배형, 신장형, 아원형으로 다양하게 나타났으며, 크기는 길이 0.28-4.10 mm, 너비 0.33-3.10 mm로 개미자리(Sagina japonica)가 가장 작게 나타났고, 갯별꽃(Honkenya peploides var. major)이 가장 크게 나타났다. 점나도나물속(Cerastium), 갯별꽃속(Honkenya), 개벼룩속(Moehringia)에서 제 부위에 부속지가 관찰되었고, 개벼룩속(Moehringia)에서만 strophiole이 관찰되어 구별되었다. 종자표면무늬에 따라 4가지 유형, 구릉상-유두형, 구릉상-기둥형, 구릉상-단순형, 평활상으로 구별하였으며, 종피세포의 형태, 주변부, 수층벽 높이의 정도, 병층세포벽의 형태 등의 형질을 기재하였다. 또한, 이전에 제시된 분류체계와의 비교를 통해 종자 미세형태학적 형질의 분류학적 유용성에 대해 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abuhadra, M. N. 2000. Taxonomic studies on the Arenaria serpyllifolia group (Caryophyllaceae). Flora Mediterranea 10: 185-190.
  2. Amini, E., S. Zarre and M. Assadi. 2011. Seed micromorphology and its systematic significance in Gypsophila (Caryophyllaceae) and allied genera. Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 660-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01208.x
  3. Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1981.tb00704.x
  4. Barthlott, W. 1984. Microstructural features of seed surface. In Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy. Heywood, V. H. and D. M. Moore (eds.), Academic Press, London. Pp. 95-105.
  5. Beentje, H. J. 2010. The Kew Plant Glossary: an illustrated dictionary of plant terms. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond.
  6. Bittrich, V. 1993. Caryophyllaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 2. Kubitzki, K., V. Bittrich and J. Rohwer (eds.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 206-230.
  7. Casazza, G., B. Borghesi, E. Roccotiello and L. Minuto. 2008. Dispersal mechanisms in some representatives of the genus Moehringia L. (Caryophyllaceae). Acta Oecologica 33: 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2007.11.003
  8. Chang, C. S., H. Kim and K. S. Chang. 2014. Provisional Checklist of Vascular Plants for the Korea Peninsula Flora (KPF). Designpost, Seoul.
  9. Chrtek, J. and Z. Slavikova. 1987. Leitbundelanordnung in den Kronblattern von ausgewahlten Arten der Familie Stellariaceae. Preslia 60: 11-21.
  10. Crow, G. E. 1979. The systematic significance of seed morphology in Sagina (Caryophyllaceae) under scanning electron microscopy. Brittonia 31: 52-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2806673
  11. Dequan, L. and J. McNeill. 2001. Minuartia. In Flora of China, Vol. 6. Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven and D. Y. Hong (eds.), Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing and St. Louis. Pp. 29-31.
  12. Dequan, L., W. Zhengyi, Z. Lihua, C. Shilong, M. G. Gilbert, M. Liden, J. McNeill, J. K. Morton, B. Oxelman, R. K. Rabeler, M. Thulin, N. J. Turland and W. L. Wagner. 2001. Caryophyllaceae. In Flora of China, Vol. 6. Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven and D. Y. Hong (eds.), Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing and St. Louis. Pp. 1-133.
  13. Fahn, A. and E. Werker. 1972. Anatomical mechanisms of seed dispersal. In Seed Biology, Vol. 1. Kozlowski, T. T. (ed.), Academic Press, New York. Pp. 151-221.
  14. Fior, S., P. O. Karis, G. Casazza, L. Minuto and F. Sala. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Caryophyllaceae (Caryophyllales) inferred from chloroplast matK and nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 93: 399-411. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.3.399
  15. Frajman, B., F. Eggens and B. Oxelman. 2009. Hybrid origins and homoploid reticulate evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae): A multigene phylogenetic approach with relative dating. Systematic Biology 58: 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp030
  16. Grear, J. W. and N. G. Dengler. 1976. The seed appendage of Eriosema (Fabaceae). Brittonia 28: 281-288. https://doi.org/10.2307/2805789
  17. Greenberg, A. K. and M. J. Donoghue. 2011. Molecular systematics and character evolution in Caryophyllaceae. Taxon 60: 1637-1652.
  18. Harbaugh, D. T., M. Nepokroeff, R. K. Rabeler, J. McNeill, E. A. Zimmer and W. L. Wagner. 2010. A new lineage-based tribal classification of the family Caryophyllaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171: 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1086/648993
  19. Heywood, V. H. 1969. Scanning Electron Microscopy in the study of plant material. Micron 1: 1-14.
  20. Hind, D. J. N. 1988. The biology and systematics of Moehringia L. (Caryophyllaceae). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Reading, Reading.
  21. Hong, S. P., M. J. Han and K. J. Kim. 1999. Systematic significance of seed coat morphology in Silene L. s. str. (Silenenae- Caryophyllaceae) from Korea. Journal of Plant Biology 42: 146-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031023
  22. Hong, S. P. and K. Choi. 2007. Caryophyllaceae. In The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea. Park, C.-W. (ed.), Academy Publishing Co., Seoul. Pp. 310-333.
  23. Julin, E. 1957. De Svenska localerma for Moehringia lateriflora (L.) Fenzl. Botaniska Notiser 100: 307-312.
  24. Kanwal, D., R. Abid and M. Qaiser. 2012. The seed atlas of Pakistan-VI. Caryophyllaceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44: 407-424.
  25. Kapil, R. N., J. Bor and F. Bouman. 1980. Seed appendages in Angiosperms. I. Introduction. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik 101: 555-573.
  26. Mahdavi, M., M. Assadi, F. Fallahian and T. Nejadsattari. 2012. The systematic significance of seed micromorphology in Stellaria L. (Caryophyllaceae) and its closest relatives in Iran. The Iranian Journal of Botany 18: 302-310.
  27. McNeill, J. 1962. Taxonomic studies in the Alsinoideae I. Generic and infra-generic groups. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh 24: 79-155.
  28. Minuto, L., S. Fior, E. Roccotiello and G. Casazza. 2006. Seed morphology in Moehringia L. and its taxonomic significance in comparative studies within the Caryophyllaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 262: 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0458-1
  29. Mostafavi, G., M. Assadi, T. Nejadsattari, F. Sharifnia and I. Mehregan. 2013. Seed micromorphological survey of the Minuartia species (Caryophyllaceae) in Iran. Turkish Journal of Botany 37: 446-454.
  30. Murley, M. R. 1951. Seeds of the Cruciferae of North Eastern America. The American Midland Naturalist 46: 1-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2421948
  31. Pax, F. and K. Hoffmann. 1934. Caryophyllaceae. In Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed. Engler, A. and K. Prantl (eds.), Engelmann, Leipzig. Pp. 275-364.
  32. Rabeler, R. K. and R. L. Hartman. 2005. Caryophyllaceae. In Flora of North America, Vol. 5. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York. Pp. 3-8.
  33. Rodriguez-Riano, T., F. J. Valtuena and A. Ortega-Olivencia. 2006. Megasporogenesis, megagametogenesis and ontogeny of the aril in Cytisus striatus and C. multiflorus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Annals of Botany 98: 777-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl166
  34. Sadeghian, S., S. Zarre and G. Heubl. 2014. Systematic implication of seed micromorphology in Arenaria (Caryophyllaceae) and allied genera. Flora 209: 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.07.004
  35. Singh, D. and S. B. Mathur. 2004. Histopathology of seed-borne infections. CRC Press, Florida. Pp. 47-80.
  36. Smissen, R.D., P. J. Garnock-Jones and G. K. Chambers. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences suggests a Pliocene origin for the bipolar distribution of Scleranthus (Caryophyllaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 16: 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1071/SB01032
  37. Thiers, B. 2015. (Continuously updated) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. Available at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
  38. Wyatt, R. 1984. Intraspecific variation in seed morphology of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Systematic Botany 9: 423-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418791
  39. Yildiz, K. 2002. Seed morphology of Caryophyllaceae species from Turkey (North Anatolia). Pakistan Journal of Botany 34: 161-171.
  40. Yildiz, K. and A. Cirpici. 1998. Seed morphological studies of Silene L., from Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany 30: 173-188.

Cited by

  1. Morphological Identification of Lepidii Seu Descurainiae Semen and Adulterant Seeds Using Microscopic Analysis vol.8, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112134
  2. 외부 및 미세형태 비교를 통한 견우자(牽牛子) 기원종 및 동속이종(同屬異種) 감별 vol.33, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6116/kjh.2018.33.4.43
  3. 한국산 개별꽃속의 분류학적 연구 vol.49, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2019.49.2.145