The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제7권6호
  • /
  • Pages.437-445
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of a "TED-Style" presentation on potential patients' willingness to accept dental implant therapy: a one-group, pre-test post-test study

  • Ghanem, Henry (Private practice limited to Prosthodontics) ;
  • Afrashtehfar, Kelvin Ian (Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University) ;
  • Abi-Nader, Samer (Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University) ;
  • Tamimi, Faleh (Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University)
  • 투고 : 2015.05.05
  • 심사 : 2015.11.24
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. A survey was conducted to assess the impact of a TED-like educational session on participants' willingness to accept dental implant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Volunteers interested in having information about dental implant therapies were recruited and asked to complete a two-part survey before and after an educational session. The initial survey elicited demographic information, self-perceived knowledge on dental implants and willingness to this kind of treatment. A "TED-style" presentation that provided information about dental implant treatments was conducted before asking the participants to complete a second set of questions assessing the impact of the session. RESULTS. The survey was completed by 104 individuals, 78.8% were women and the mean age was $66.5{\pm}10.8$. Before the educational session, 76.0% of the participants refused dental implants mainly due to lack of knowledge. After the educational session, the rejection of dental implants decreased by almost four folds to 20.2%. CONCLUSION. This study proved that an educational intervention can significantly increase willingness to accept treatment with dental implants in a segment of the population who is interested in having information about dental implant therapy. Furthermore, educational interventions, such as TED-like talks, might be useful to increase popular awareness on dental implant therapy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Geissler CA, Bates JF. The nutritional effects of tooth loss. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;39:478-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/39.3.478
  2. Afrashtehfar KI, Kurtzman GM, Mahesh L. Improving oral rehabilitation through the preservation of the tissues through alveolar preservation. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:174-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.174
  3. Turkyilmaz I, Company AM, McGlumphy EA. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2010;27:3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00294.x
  4. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:381-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x
  5. Christensen GJ. Recommending the best treatment for patients. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:426-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0136
  6. Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza Edos S. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:377-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023
  7. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients:satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:117-22.
  8. Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient’s satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:220-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12241
  9. Vilhjalmsson VH, Klock KS, Storksen K, Bardsen A. Aesthetics of implant-supported single anterior maxillary crowns evaluated by objective indices and participants’ perceptions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1399-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02128.x
  10. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Heydecke G, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais JA, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002;19:3-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x
  11. Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures-a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent 2012;40:22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.017
  12. Das KP, Jahangiri L, Katz RV. The first-choice standard of care for an edentulous mandible: a Delphi method survey of academic prosthodontists in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:881-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0292
  13. Vahidi F, Pinto-Sinai G. Complications associated with implant-retained removable prostheses. Dent Clin North Am 2015;59:215-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.001
  14. Muller F, Salem K, Barbezat C, Herrmann FR, Schimmel M. Knowledge and attitude of elderly persons towards dental implants. Gerodontology 2012;29:e914-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00586.x
  15. Warpeha WS Jr. Expanding prosthodontic services to the older patient in dental practices. Northwest Dent 2011;90:21-4.
  16. Zimmer CM, Zimmer WM, Williams J, Liesener J. Public awareness and acceptance of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:228-32.
  17. Afrashtehfar KI. Why would someone refuse the best choice of treatment?. J N J Dent Assoc 2013;84:11-2.
  18. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, Ellner S, Chaffee N, Molina AL, Moriarty JD, Paquette D, Palmqvist U. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:182-92.
  19. Heaton LJ, Carlson CR, Smith TA, Baer RA, de Leeuw R. Predicting anxiety during dental treatment using patients’selfreports: less is more. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:188-95. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0135
  20. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. I: level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:223-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02035.x
  21. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, Teller C, Zechner W, Watzak G, Watzek G. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:621-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00916.x
  22. Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Lariviere V, Tsou A, Mongeon P, Macaluso B. Scientists popularizing science: characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PLoS One 2013;8:e62403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062403
  23. Tsou A, Thelwall M, Mongeon P, Sugimoto CR. A community of curious souls: an analysis of commenting behavior on TED talks videos. PLoS One 2014;9:e93609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093609
  24. Blouin RA, Riffee WH, Robinson ET, Beck DE, Green C, Joyner PU, Persky AM, Pollack GM. Roles of innovation in education delivery. Am J Pharm Educ 2009;73:154. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7308154
  25. Abi-Nader S. To implant or not to implant: that is the question. Montreal, Canada.: 2011. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_EN9b-QchfI. 2013.
  26. Spalding NJ. Reducing anxiety by pre-operative education: make the future familiar. Occup Ther Int 2003;10:278-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.191
  27. Heikkinen K, Helena LK, Taina N, Anne K, Sanna S. A comparison of two educational interventions for the cognitive empowerment of ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:272-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.015
  28. Nicolle E, Britton E, Janakiram P, Robichaud PM. UsingTED Talks to teach social determinants of health: maximizethe message with a modern medium. Can Fam Physician2014;60:777-8, 788-9.
  29. Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:401-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005401.x
  30. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzak G, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tepper G. Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. II: implant acceptance, patient-perceived costs and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01969.x
  31. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, Teller C, Bernhart T, Monov G, Watzek G. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. II. Implant acceptance, patient-perceived cost and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:634-42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00917.x
  32. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:483-8.
  33. Spleen AM, Kluhsman BC, Clark AD, Dignan MB, Lengerich EJ; ACTION Health Cancer Task Force. An increase in HPV-related knowledge and vaccination intent among parental and non-parental caregivers of adolescent girls, age 9-17 years, in Appalachian Pennsylvania. J Cancer Educ 2012;27:312-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0294-z
  34. Narby B. Factors shaping demand for prostethic dentistry treatment with special focus on implant dentistry. Swed Dent J Suppl 2011;3-65.
  35. Tedesco LA, Garlapo DA. Social and economic factors in prosthodontic practice and education. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:310-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90473-1
  36. Salonen MA. Assessment of states of dentures and interest in implant-retained prosthetic treatment in 55-year-old edentulous Finns. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:130-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01588.x
  37. Brus MJ, Jennit A. HIV knowledge, attitudes and practices among 12th-grade students in southern India, before and after an HIV-education session. J Commun Dis 2010;42:123-33.
  38. Bonetti GA, Alberti A, Sartini C, Parenti SI. Patients' selfperception of dentofacial attractiveness before and after exposure to facial photographs. Angle Orthod 2011;81:517-24. https://doi.org/10.2319/101510-606.1
  39. Palmqvist S, Soderfeldt B, Arnbjerg D. Subjective need for implant dentistry in a Swedish population aged 45-69 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:99-102. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020301.x
  40. Rustemeyer J, Bremerich A. Patients’ knowledge and expectations regarding dental implants: assessment by questionnaire. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:814-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.003
  41. Ellis JS, Levine A, Bedos C, Mojon P, Rosberger Z, Feine J, Thomason JM. Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology 2011;28:62-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00348.x
  42. Reichart R, Vogel I, Weiss T, Hennig S, Walter J, Kalff R. Short Psychological Intervention as a Perioperative Pain Reduction Treatment in Spinal Neurosurgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2011 Nov 16.
  43. Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.016
  44. Christensen GJ. Helping patients understand and accept the best treatment plans. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:197-200. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0064
  45. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004;31:143-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
  46. Egger MJ, Miller JR. Testing for experimental effects in the pretest-posttest design. Nurs Res 1984;33:306-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198409000-00015
  47. Brener ND, Billy JO, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health 2003;33:436-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1
  48. Halvorsen PA, Selmer R, Kristiansen IS. Different ways to describe the benefits of risk-reducing treatments: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:848-56. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00006
  49. Ostberg AL, Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Rastam L, Lindblad U. Tooth loss and obesity in a defined Swedish population. Scand J Public Health 2009;37:427-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494808099964
  50. Chen JT, Kaddour A, Krieger N. Implications of missing income data. Public Health Rep 2008;123:260. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490812300303

피인용 문헌

  1. Evidence-based dentistry for planning restorative treatments: barriers and potential solutions vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12208
  2. Prevention and Management of Cheek and/or Tongue Biting Related to Posterior Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses (ISFDPs) pp.1059941X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12912
  3. Patient-centred care: how close to this are we? vol.45, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2018.45.6.557
  4. Understanding the Lived Experience of North American Dental Patients With a Single-Tooth Implant in the Upper Front Region of the Mouth: Protocol for a Qualitative Study vol.10, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2196/25767
  5. Dental Curriculum's Continuing Improvement in the North American and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Education Systems vol.15, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010601
  6. Canadian Dental Patients with a Single-Unit Implant-Supported Restoration in the Aesthetic Region of the Mouth: Qualitative and Quantitative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) vol.6, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/data6080090