DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New indices of structural robustness and structural fragility

  • Andre, Joao (Department of Structures, National Laboratory for Civil Engineering) ;
  • Beale, Robert (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University) ;
  • Baptista, Antonio M. (Department of Structures, National Laboratory for Civil Engineering)
  • Received : 2015.08.06
  • Accepted : 2015.12.02
  • Published : 2015.12.25

Abstract

Structural robustness has become an important design variable. However, based on the existing definitions of structural robustness it is often difficult to analyse and evaluate structural robustness, and sometimes not efficient since they mix structural robustness with several other structural variables. This paper concerns the development of a new structural robustness definition, and structural robustness and structural fragility indices. The basis for the development of the new indices is the analysis of the damage energy of structural systems for a given hazard scenario and involves a criterion to define an "unavoidable collapse" state. Illustrative examples are given detailing the steps and calculations needed to obtain values for both the structural robustness and the structural fragility indices. Finally, this paper presents the main advantages of the newly proposed definition and indices for the structural risk analysis over existing traditional methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Andre, J., Beale, R. and Baptista, A. (2012), "A survey of failures of bridge falsework systems since 1970", Proceedings of the ICE - Forensic Engineering, 65(4), 161-172.
  2. Andre, J., Beale, R. and Baptista, A. (2013), "Recent advances and existing challenges in the design of bridge falsework systems", Civil Eng. Environ. Syst., 30(2), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2012.733374
  3. Andre, J., Beale, R. and Baptista, A. (2015a), "Finite element models of bridge falsework systems", Struct. Eng. Mech. (under Review)
  4. Andre, J., Beale, R. and Baptista, A. (2015b), "Experimental analysis of bridge falsework Cuplok joints", Steel Compos. Struct. (under Review)
  5. Andre, J., Beale, R. and Baptista, A. (2015c), "Risk analysis of bridge falsework Cuplok systems", Struct. Eng. Mech. (under Review)
  6. Andre, J. (2014), "Determination of the main parameters affecting the performance of bridge falsework systems", PhD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
  7. Baker, J., Schubert, M. and Faber, M. (2008), "On the assessment of robustness", Struct. Saf., 30(3), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.004
  8. Baptista, A. and Muzeau, J. (2001), "Analytical formulation of the design of circular hollow sections in the elastoplastic regime", Proceedings of III Portuguese National Conference of Steel and Composite Construction, Aveiro, Portugal, December. (in Portuguese)
  9. Bazant, Z., Le, J., Greening, F. and Benson, D. (2008), "What did and did not cause collapse of World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York?", J. Eng. Mech., 134(10), 892-906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:10(892)
  10. Bazant, Z. and Verdure, M. (2007), "Mechanics of progressive collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and building demolitions", J. Eng. Mech., 133(3), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:3(308)
  11. Bazant, Z. and Zhou, Y. (2002), "Why did the World Trade Center collapse? - simple analysis", J. Eng. Mech., 128(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(2)
  12. Beale, R. (2014), "Scaffold research - a review", J. Constr. Steel Res., 98, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.016
  13. BS EN 1990 (2002), Eurocode 0: Basis of Structural Design, UK.
  14. BS EN 1991-1-7 (2006), Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures - Part 1-7: General Actions - Accidental Actions, UK.
  15. Chandrangsu, T. and Rasmussen, K. (2011), "Structural modelling of support scaffold systems", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(5), 866-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.12.007
  16. CEB (1993), CEB-FIP Model Code 90, Thomas Telford, London, UK.
  17. Dusenberry, D. and Hamburger, R. (2006), "Practical means for energy-based analyses of disproportionate collapse potential", J. Perform. Construct. Facil., 20(4), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(336)
  18. Ellingwood, B., Smilowitz, R., Dusenberry, D., Duthinh, D., Lew, H. and Carino, N. (2007), Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildings, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA.
  19. Faber, M. (2009), Risk and Safety in Engineering Course Lecture Notes, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), Switzerland.
  20. Fang, Z. (2007), "Energy-based approach to structural robustness", J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., 15(4), 319-234.
  21. Frangopol, D. and Curley, J. (1987), "Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability", J. Struct. Eng., 113(7), 1533-1549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:7(1533)
  22. Fu, G. and Frangopol, D. (1990), "Balancing weight, system reliability and redundancy in a multiobjective optimization framework", Struct. Saf., 7(2-4), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90066-X
  23. Gardner, L. (2008), "The continuous strength method", Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, 161(3), 127-133.
  24. ISO 2394 (2002), General Principles on Reliability for Structures, Switzerland.
  25. Knoll, F. and Vogel, T. (2009), Design for Robustness, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), Zurich, Switzerland.
  26. Korol, R. and Sivakumaran, K. (2014), "Reassessing the plastic hinge model for energy dissipation of axially loaded columns", J. Struct., 2014(1), 1-7.
  27. Narasimhan, H. and Faber, M. (2009), "Categorisation and assessment of robustness related provisions in European standards", Proceedings of the Joint Workshop of COST Actions TU0601 and E55, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September.
  28. Smith, J. (2006), "Structural robustness analysis and the fast fracture analogy", Struct. Eng. Int. (SEI), 16(2), 18-123. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686606777962765
  29. Starossek, U. and Haberland, M. (2008), "Measures of structural robustness - Requirements & applications", Proceedings of the ASCE SEI 2008 Structures Congress - Crossing Borders, Vancouver, Canada, April.
  30. Starossek, U. and Haberland, M. (2009), "Evaluating measures of structural robustness", Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2009: Don't Mess with Structural Engineers - Expanding Our Role, Austin, Texas, May.
  31. Starossek, U. and Wolff, M. (2005), "Progressive collapse: design strategies", Proceedings of IABSE Symposium, Structures and Extreme Events, Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  32. Starossek, U. (2006), "Progressive collapse of structures: Nomenclature and procedures", Struct. Eng. Int. (SEI), 16(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686606777962477
  33. Starossek, U. (2009), Progressive Collapse of Structures, Thomas Telford, London, UK.
  34. Todinov, M. (2007), Risk-Based Reliability Analysis and Generic Principles for Risk Reduction, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  35. USDOD (2010), Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, United States of America Defence Department, USA.

Cited by

  1. Risk analysis of bridge falsework cuplok systems vol.13, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1265991
  2. A new damage index for seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete columns vol.60, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.5.875
  3. Experimental analysis of bridge falsework Cuplok systems vol.171, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00081
  4. Analysis on the Time-Varying Fragility of Offshore Concrete Bridge vol.2019, pp.1099-0526, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2739212
  5. A method to evaluate the risk-based robustness index in blast-influenced structures vol.12, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.047
  6. A correction method for objective seismic damage index of reinforced concrete columns vol.21, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.6.741
  7. Systematic Reliability-Based Approach to Progressive Collapse vol.4, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0000990
  8. Numerical analysis of bridge falsework Cuplok systems vol.172, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00082
  9. Analysis on damage of RC frames retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces based on estimation of damage index vol.70, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.6.781
  10. Proposal of Guidelines for the Evolution of Robustness Framework in the Future Generation of Eurocodes vol.29, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2019.1599706