참고문헌
- Ahmed Elmarakbi, Niki Fielding (2009). New Design of Roadside Pole Structure: Crash Analysis of Different Longitudinal Tubes using LS-DYNA. In the 7th European LS-DYNA Conference.
- Alberta Transportation (2007). Roadside Design Guide, Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation.
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). NCHRP Report 350.
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2002). Roadside Design Guide, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington, D. C.
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2010). Highway Safety Manual.
- American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2011). Roadside Design Guide 4th Edition.
- Byun et al. (2011), The Study on U-Service Priority for Low-Income People Using AHP, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1.
- CEN (2006). EN 1991-1-7 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part1-7.
- CEN (2006). EN 1991-2 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part2:Traffic loads on bridges.
- CEN. (2007). Passive safety of support structures for road equipment requirements, EN 12767, European Committee for Standardization.
- Choi et al. (2009), Selection of Expressway Ramp Metering Sites and Priority Making, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 29, No. 5D.
- Elmarakbi A., Sennah K., Samaan M. and Siyira P (2006). Crashworthiness of motor vehicle and traffic light pole in frontal collision. The ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(9):722-733. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:9(722)
- Holguin-Veras (1995), Comparative Assessment of AHP and MAV in Highway Planning : CASE STUDY, Journal of Transportation engineering, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:2(191)
- Kim, K. and V. Bernardin (2000), Application of an Analytical Hierarchy Process at the Indiana Department of Transportation for Prioritizing Major Highway Capital Investments, Proceeding of the 7th TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, pp. 266-278.
- Kim et al. (2010), Methodology for Selecting Traffic Safety Warning Messages Using Analytical Hierarchical Process(AHP)-based Multi-Criteria Value Function, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 9, No. 4.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(MOLIT). (2012). Manual for Traffic Management on Work Zone.
- Oh et al. (2005), Application of AHP to Select for Priority of Permanent Traffic Volume Survey Site, Korean Society of Road Engineers, Vol. 7, No. 4.
- Park et al.(2013), The Decision of Order Priority of HUD Contents for Public Transit, International J. Highw. Engineering Vol. 15 No. 1.
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1) : 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
- The national policy agency (2014). Statistics on Traffic Accidents in 2014 year.
- Yang et al. (2001), On Application of the GSIS and AHP in Determination of the Optimum Route, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 21, No. 2D.
- Yang et al. (2012), Evaluation for Operational Efficiency of Road Management Equipment using Analytical Hierarchy Process, Korean Society of Road Engineers, Vol. 14, No. 5.
- Yang et al. (2013), Methodology for effective operation of road management equipment, Transport Policy, 30, pp. 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.008
피인용 문헌
- Safety Performance Evaluations for the Vehicle Based Movable Barriers Using Full Scale Crash Tests vol.124, pp.2261-236X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712404002