Acknowledgement
Supported by : Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Ministry of Industry, Energy, and Trade
References
- Temple D, Courboulay V, Manteca X, Velarde A, Dalmau A: The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing. Animal 2012, 6:656-667. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001868
- Blokhuis HJ, Keeling LJ, Gavinelli A, Serratosa J: Animal welfare's impact on the food chain. Trends Food Sci Technol 2008, 19:S79-S87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.007
- Botreau R, Bonde M, Butterworth A, Perny P, Bracke M, Capdeville J, Veissier I: Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods. Animal 2007, 1:1179-1187.
-
Veissier I, Jensen KK, Botrea R, Sandoe P: Highlighting ethical decisions underlying the scoring of animal welfare in the Welfare
$Quality^{(R)}$ scheme. Anim Welf 2011, 20:89. - Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol for Pigs (Sows and Piglets, Growing and Finishing Pigs) [https://www.google.co.kr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welfarequalitynetwork.net%2Fdownloadattachment%2F45627%2F21651%2FPig%2520Protocol.pdf&ei=XyXzU6LMEcG48gXyjYC4Dg&usg=AFQjCNG5G_tOnriEP5ZLdOhmEFnXoQ8g5Q]
- National Pork Board: Pork Checkoff: Swine Welfare Assurance Program : a Program of America's Pork Producers. Des Moines: National Pork Board; 2003.
- Courboulay V, Foubert C: Testing different methods to evaluate pig welfare on farm. Anim Welf 2007, 16:193-196.
- Yao H, Choi H, Zhu K, Lee J: Key volatile organic compounds emitted from swine nursery house. Atmos Environ 2011, 45:2577-2584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.058
- Yao H, Choi H, Lee J, Suresh A, Zhu K: Effect of microclimate on particulate matter, airborne bacteria, and odorous compounds in swine nursery houses. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:3707-3714. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2399
-
Temple D, Dalmau A, Ruiz de la Torre JL, Manteca X, Velarde A: Application of the Welfare
$Quality^{(R)}$ protocol to assess growing pigs kept under intensive conditions in Spain. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 2011, 6:138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2010.10.003 - Banhazi T, Seedorf J, Rutley DL, Pitchford WS: Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 1. Study justification and design. J Agric Saf Health 2008, 14:5-20. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24120
- Lee C, Giles L, Bryden W, Downing J, Owens PC, Kirby A, Wynn P: Performance and endocrine responses of group housed weaner pigs exposed to the air quality of a commercial environment. Livest Prod Sci 2005, 93:255-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.10.003
- Philippe F-X, Cabaraux J-F, Nicks B: Ammonia emissions from pig houses: influencing factors and mitigation techniques. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2011, 141:245-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.012
- Carpenter G: Dust in livestock buildings-review of some aspects. J Agr Eng Res 1986, 33:227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(86)80038-5
- Takai H, Pedersen S, Johnsen JO, Metz J, Groot Koerkamp P, Uenk G, Phillips V, Holden M, Sneath R, Short J: Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agr Eng Res 1998, 70:59-77. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0280
- Gustafsson G: Factors affecting the release and concentration of dust in pig houses. J Agr Eng Res 1999, 74:379-390. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0476
- Pearson C, Sharples T: Airborne dust concentrations in livestock buildings and the effect of feed. J Agr Eng Res 1995, 60:145-154. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1995.1008
- Tan Z, Zhang Y: A review of effects and control methods of particulate matter in animal indoor environments. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2004, 54:845-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470950
- Otten D, Annas E, Van den Weghe H: The application of animal welfare standards in intensive production systems using the assessment protocols of Welfare Quality: fattening pig husbandry in Northwest Germany. Int J Livest Prod 2013, 4:49-59. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP12.037
- Temple D, Manteca X, Velarde A, Dalmau A: Assessment of animal welfare through behavioural parameters in Iberian pigs in intensive and extensive conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011, 131:29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.013
- Swine Care Handbook [http://www.antwifarms.com/docs/swinecarehandbook.pdf]
- Broom DM: Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 97:73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.019
- Temple D, Courboulay V, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Manteca X: The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Anim Welf 2012, 21:257-271. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.2.257
- Pearce G: Epidemiology of enteric disease in grower-finisher pigs: a postal survey of pig producers in England. Vet Rec 1999, 144:338-342. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.13.338
- Tuyttens FAM: The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005, 92:261-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.007
- Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M-V, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB: Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 101:185-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
- Wemelsfelder F, Hunter E, Mendl MT, Lawrence AB: The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000, 67:193-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00093-3
Cited by
- A Detrimental Role of Immunosuppressive Drug, Dexamethasone, During Clostridium difficile Infection in Association with a Gastrointestinal Microbial Shift vol.26, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1512.12017
- Effects of relative humidity on animal health and welfare vol.16, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(16)61532-0
- Genetic Diversity Analyses of Asian Duck Populations using 24 Microsatellite Markers vol.44, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2017.44.2.75
- Effects of Applying Microbial Additive Inoculants to Spent Mushroom Substrate (Flammulina velutipes) on Rumen Fermentation and Total-tract Nutrient Digestibility in Hanwoo Steers vol.25, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11625/kjoa.2017.25.3.569
- 국내 가축분뇨 자원화 특성을 고려한 OECD 질소수지 산정법의 지역단위 적용 연구 vol.33, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15681/kswe.2017.33.5.546
- Nutrient digestibility, haemo-biochemical parameters and growth performance of an indigenous chicken strain fed canola meal-containing diets vol.51, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01949-4
- Application of a Protocol to Assess Camel Welfare: Scoring System of Collected Measures, Aggregated Assessment Indices, and Criteria to Classify a Pen vol.11, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020494