디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제13권11호
  • /
  • Pages.417-425
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국과 중국소비자들의 소셜커머스 이용에 따른 차이 연구: 고려요인, 쇼핑가치, 구매만족과 재방문의도를 중심으로

Study on the difference in the Social Commerce use of Korea and China Consumer: Consider factor, shopping value, purchase satisfaction and intention to revisit

  • 김은희 (목원대학교 광고홍보언론학과)
  • Kim, Eun-Hee (Dept. of Advertising & Public Relations & journalism, Mokwon University)
  • 투고 : 2015.09.20
  • 심사 : 2015.11.20
  • 발행 : 2015.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국과 중국소비자들의 소셜커머스 이용 시 고려요인, 쇼핑가치, 구매만족 그리고 재방문의도에는 차이가 있는지 확인한 것이다. 먼저 소셜커머스를 이용할 경우 고려하는 요인을 확인한 결과 경제성, 유용성, 정보성, 편의성으로 확인되었다. 첫째, 소셜커머스 이용 시 경제성, 편의성 요인은 한국 소비자들이 더 많이 고려하는 것으로 확인되었다. 그러나 소셜커머스의 유용성은 중국소비자들이 더 많이 고려하는 것으로 확인되었다. 정보성은 한국과 중국소비자들에게는 차이가 없는 것으로 확인되었다. 둘째, 소셜커머스의 합리적 쇼핑가치와 쾌락적 쇼핑가치 모두 중국소비자들이 더 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 셋째, 소셜커머스 이용에 따른 구매만족에는 한국소비자들이 더 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 넷째, 소셜커머스 재방문의도는 중국소비자들이 더 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 이상의 연구결과는 소셜커머스 이용에 따른 한국과 중국소비자들의 차이를 확인함으로써 한국기업의 중국 진출을 위한 소셜커머스 활용에 의미 있는 자료가 될 것으로 사료 드리는 바이다.

The purpose of this study is to verify differences between Korean and Chinese consumers in consideration, shopping value, the extent of purchase satisfaction and intent to revisit the site when people use social commerce. When Korean and Chinese consumers use social commerce, it was confirmed that they look at four things; economical efficiency, practical, informativeness, and convenience. There are the following results. Firstly, it was found that in the case of using social commerce, economical efficiency as a factor of consideration was higher in Chinese consumers than Korean consumers. Secondly, practical of social commerce concerns the social commerce site's trustworthiness and stability, and also the popularity of the site and ease in which users can use the site. In this, this factor is more important to Chinese consumers than Korean consumers. Thirdly, in the factors of informativeness, which means product information and quality, and buyers comments, there was no confirmed difference between Korean and Chinese consumers. Fourth, in the convenience factor, there was a difference found between Korean and Chinese consumers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. www.wikipedia.org.
  2. Kim, Moon-Jung. "A Study on Difference between Korea and China Consumers in importance of Attributes, Shopping Value and Loyalty in Social Commerce", Journal of Distribution Science, Vol.13, No.1, pp.47-55, 2015.
  3. The Korean Intellectual Property Office, 2012. http://www.kipo.go.kr/
  4. Stephen, A. T., and Toubia, O. "Deriving Value from Social Commerce Networks", Journal of Marketing Research(47:2), April, pp.215-228, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.2.215
  5. Ranky 2014 e-Commerce Analysis Report for the first half year(PC-Mobile). Seoul, Korea: Media Channel, Retrieved June 30, 2014, 2015. http://www.rankey.com/report
  6. I bizkorea China Mall: China's online B2C. Seoul, Korea: Ibiz Korea, Retrieved July 30, 2013. from http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=lbizkor ea&logNo=110170780418
  7. iResearch China Mobile Shopping Report (Brief Edition). Seoul, Korea: iResearch Consulting Group, Retrieved July. 30, 2014, 2014. from http://www.iresearchchina.com/reports/6112.html
  8. Rubel, S. "2006 Trends to Watch Part Ii: Social Commerce", in: Micro Persuasion, 2005.
  9. Ahn, K. H. The structural relationships among customer trust, satisfaction and loyalty in social commerce context: Focusing on trust transfer. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul, Korea: Sejong University, 2011.
  10. Park, H. H., and Jeon, J. O. "The effect of multidimensional consumption value of social commerce on attitude reuse intention: Moderating role of opportunity scarcity perception", Journal of Marketing Management Research, Vol.17, No.4, pp.173-196, 2012.
  11. Bloch, P. H., and Richins, M. L. "A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions", Journal of Marketing, 47, pp.69-81, 1983. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251198
  12. Chung, S. Y., and Park, C. "mpact of Culture and Shopping Values on Evaluation of Attributions of Online Shopping Mall: Comparisons between Korea and UK", The Journal of internet electronic commerce research, 12(1), pp.81-103, 2012.
  13. Jun, Byoung-Ho and Kang, Byung-Goo. "Effects of Information Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Continuous Intention to use in Social Commerce", Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol.18, No.3, March, 2013.
  14. Zhou Yi. Jun., Ryu, Mi. Hyun., and Lee, Seung. Sin. "Complaining Behavior and Repurchase Intention on Social Commerce for South Korean and Chinese Consumers", Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol.23, No.2, pp.225-248, 2012.
  15. Jo, Seong Youn. "A study on the Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention of Korean and Chinese Social Commerce's User: Focused on the Food Service Coupon's User". Konkuk University, Dissertation of Master, 2011.
  16. Kim, Eun-hee and Yoo, Sung-yup. "What are the Factors Affecting?; Shopping Attitudes of Consumers using Social Commerce Korea Consumer Association", Spring Conference, 2013.
  17. Collier, Joel E., and Carol C. "Bienstock. Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing", Journal of Service Research, Vol.8, No.3, pp.260-275, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670505278867
  18. Jun, Sung-Eun and Chung Ki-Han. "A Study on the Factors of Internet Shopping Site Affecting Customer's e-Satisfaction, e-Loyalty, and Repurchasing Intention", Internet e-Commerce Research, Vol.16, No.3, pp.133-158, 2006.
  19. Garson, D. Factor Analysis. North Carolina State University, 2004.
  20. Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.