DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antibacterial Properties of Pit and Fissure Sealant Containing S-PRG filler on Streptococcus mutans

S-PRG filler를 포함한 치면열구전색제의 Streptococcus mutans에 대한 항미생물 특성에 관한 연구

  • An, Jinseon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Howon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Seo, Hyunwoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Lee, Siyoung (Department of Oral Microbiology and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 안진선 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학 교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박호원 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학 교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 서현우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 소아치과학 교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 이시영 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 미생물학 및 면역학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2015.06.18
  • Accepted : 2015.07.17
  • Published : 2015.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties of a sealant containing S-PRG filler compared to those of two contemporary commercial sealants to determine the inhibition of bacterial growth in broth culture and biofilm formation using the CDC Biofilm Reactor. The BeautiSealant containing S-PRG filler, the fluoride releasing Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant, which are known to have higher antibacterial effects, and the non-fluoride releasing Concise$^{TM}$ sealant were selected for this study. A Streptococcus mutans culture in BHI broth without sealant served as a negative control in the planktonic growth inhibition test. As a result, bacterial growth was inhibited in all three sealant groups compared to that in the control. The Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant showed a significantly reduced number of CFUs compared to those of the BeautiSealant and Concise$^{TM}$ sealants. However, no significant difference was detected between the BeautiSealant and Concise$^{TM}$ sealants. The Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant significantly decreased biofilm formation compared to that by the BeautiSealant and Concise$^{TM}$ sealants. No significant difference was observed between the BeautiSealant and Concise$^{TM}$ sealants. In conclusion, the sealant containing S-PRG filler had a less potent anti-bacterial property and increased biofilm formation capacity compared to those of the fluoride releasing Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant.

본 연구는 Planktonic growth inhibition test와 CDC Biofilm Reactor를 사용한 Biofilm assay를 통해 S-PRG filler를 함유하는 치면열구전색제의 S. mutans에 대한 항미생물 효과를 기존의 치면열구전색제와 비교하고자 하였다. S-PRG 필러를 함유하는 치면열구전색제인 BeautiSealant, 불소를 방출하는 치면열구전색제인 Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant, 불소 미방출 치면열구전색제인 Concise$^{TM}$ sealant를 실험군으로 선정하였다. 성장억제평가를 위해 치면열구전색제를 사용하지 않은 군을 음성 대조군으로 설정하였으며, 3개의 실험군 모두 대조군보다 유의할 정도로 낮은 집락 형성 단위를 보였고, Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant가 BeautiSealant와 Concise$^{TM}$ sealant보다 유의할 정도로 낮은 집락 형성 단위를 보였다. BeautiSealant와 Concise$^{TM}$ sealant 군간에는 유의한 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. 바이오 필름 평가에서도 Clinpro$^{TM}$ sealant군이 BeautiSealant와 Concise$^{TM}$ sealant군들에 비해 유의할 정도로 낮은 집락 형성을 보였으며, BeautiSealant와 Concise$^{TM}$ sealant 군간에 유의한 차이는 관찰되지 않았다. 본 연구 결과 S-PRG filler를 포함하는 치면열구전색제인 BeautiSealant는 기존의 불소방출 치면열구전색제에 비하여 낮은 항미생물 효과와 높은 바이오 필름 형성능을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Griffin SO, Gray SK, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF : Caries risk in formerly sealed teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 140:415-423, 2009. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0190
  2. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, et al. : Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3: Cd001830, 2013.
  3. Mejare I, Lingstrom P, Petersson LG, et al. : Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand, 61:321-330, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310007581
  4. Matalon S, Peretz B, Sidon R, et al. : Antibacterial properties of pit and fissure sealants combined with daily fluoride mouth rinse. Pediatr Dent, 32:9-13, 2010.
  5. Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F : Antibacterial activity of fluoride release sealants on mutans streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 20:109-111, 1996.
  6. Petrovski KR, Caicedo-Caldas A, Williamson NB, et al. : Efficacy of a novel internal dry period teat sealant containing 0.5% chlorhexidine against experimental challenge with Streptococcus uberis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, 94:3366-3375, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3744
  7. Yang SY, Piao YZ, Kim SM, et al. : Acid neutralizing, mechanical and physical properties of pit and fissure sealants containing melt-derived 45S5 bioactive glass. Dent Mater, 29:1228-1235, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.007
  8. Al-Naimi, Al-Alousi, Al-Nema : Effect of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticle addition on microhardness and depth of cure of resin based pit and fissure sealants. IJERSTE, 4:157-163, 2015.
  9. Naorungroj S, Wei HH, Arnold RR, et al. : Antibacterial surface properties of fluoride-containing resin-based sealants. J Dent, 38:387-391, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.005
  10. Shin SW, Kim JS : Microleakage and anticariogenic effect of S-PRG filler-containing pit and fissure sealant. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 40:247-252, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2013.40.4.247
  11. Tay FR, Sano H, Tagami J, et al. : Ultrastructural study of a glass ionomer-based, all-in-one adhesive. J Dent, 29:489-498, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00046-X
  12. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Kouro Y, et al. : Optimizing filler content in an adhesive system containing prereacted glass-ionomer fillers. Dent Mater, 19:137- 146, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00022-2
  13. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley DH : A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J, 27:315-339, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.315
  14. Kamijo K, Mukai Y, Tominaga T, et al. : Fluoride release and recharge characteristics of denture base resins containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer filler. Dent Mater J, 28:227-233, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.227
  15. Mukai Y, Kamijo K, Fujino F, et al. : Effect of denture base-resin with prereacted glass-ionomer filler on dentin demineralization. Eur J Oral Sci, 117: 750-754, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00678.x
  16. Tomiyama K, Mukai Y, Teranaka T : Acid resistance induced by a new orthodontic bonding system in vitro. Dent Mater J, 27:590-597, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.590
  17. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, et al. : Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glassionomer filler particles. Dent Mater J, 29:193-198, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-050
  18. Yoneda M, Suzuki N, Masuo Y, et al. : Effect of SPRG eluate on biofilm formation and enzyme activity of oral bacteria. Int J Dent, 2012:814913, 2012.
  19. Ying W, Masayuki K, Daisuke K : Ion release and buffering capacity of S-PRG filler-containing pit and fissure sealant in lactic acid. Nano Biomedicine, 3: 275-281, 2011.
  20. Kimyai S, Lotfipour F, Pourabbas R, et al. : Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 16:e561-567, 2011.
  21. Goeres DM, Loetterle LR, Hamilton MA, et al. : Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms. Microbiology, 151:757-762, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27709-0
  22. Ogawa A, Furukawa S, Fujita S, et al. : Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by Streptococcus salivarius FruA. Appl Environ Microbiol, 77:1572-1580, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02066-10
  23. Oong EM, Griffin SO, Kohn WG, et al. : The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: a review of the evidence. J Am Dent Assoc, 139: 271-278, 2008. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0156
  24. Song KW : Study on the degree of conversion and fluoride release of fluoride-containing sealants. Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul University, Seoul, 1999.
  25. Seo YJ : Effect of resin monomers on the activity of cariogenic bacteria. Ph. D. Dissertation, Chosun University, Kwang Ju, 2004.
  26. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF : Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater, 20:789-795, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
  27. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T : Review on fluoride- releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23:343- 362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
  28. Van Loveren C : Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance: identification of research questions. Caries Res, 1:65-70, 2001.
  29. Guida A, Towler MR, Wall JG, et al. : Preliminary work on the antibacterial effect of strontium in glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Lett, 22:1401-1403, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025794927195
  30. Dabsie F, Gregoire G, Sixou M, Sharrock P : Does strontium play a role in the cariostatic activity of glass ionomer:Strontium diffusion and antibacterial activity. J Dent, 37:554-559, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.013
  31. Koletsi-Kounari H, Mamai-Homata E, Diamanti I : An in vitro study of the effect of aluminum and the combined effect of strontium, aluminum, and fluoride elements on early enamel carious lesions. Biol Trace Elem Res, 147:418-427, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9328-6
  32. Dembitsky VM, Al Quntar AA, Srebnik M : Natural and synthetic small boron-containing molecules as potential inhibitors of bacterial and fungal quorum sensing. Chem Rev, 111:209-237, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100093b
  33. Kaga M, Kakuda S, Ida Y, et al. : Inhibition of enamel demineralization by buffering effect of SPRG filler-containing dental sealant. Eur J Oral Sci, 122:78-83, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12107
  34. Suzuki N, Yoneda M, Haruna K, et al. : Effects of S-PRG eluate on oral biofilm and oral malodor. Arch Oral Biol, 59:407-413, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.01.009
  35. Hahnel S, Wastl DS, Schneider-Feyrer S, et al. : Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and release of fluoride from experimental resin-based composites depending on surface treatment and S-PRG filler particle fraction. J Adhes Dent, 16:313-321, 2014.
  36. Fujimoto Y, Iwasa M, Murayama R, et al. : Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers and their modulation effect. Dent Mater J, 29:392-397, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-015
  37. Ito S, Iijima M, Hashimoto M, et al. : Effects of surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer fillers on mineral induction by phosphoprotein. J Dent, 39:72-79, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.10.011
  38. Al-Bakri IA, Harty D, Al-Omari WM, et al. : Surface characteristics and microbial adherence ability of modified polymethylmethacrylate by fluoridated glass fillers. Aust Dent J, 59:482-489, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12218
  39. Fan Y, Townsend J, Wang Y, et al. : Formulation and characterization of antibacterial fluoride-releasing sealants. Pediatr Dent, 35:E13-18, 2013.
  40. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP : Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science, 284:1318-1322, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318
  41. Brambilla E, Ionescu A, Cazzaniga G, et al. : The influence of antibacterial toothpastes on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation: a continuous culture study. Am J Dent, 27:160-166, 2014.
  42. Somanah J, Bourdon E, Bahorun T, Aruoma OI : The inhibitory effect of a fermented papaya preparation on growth, hydrophobicity, and acid production of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus mitis, and Lactobacillus acidophilus: its implications in oral health improvement of diabetics. Food science & nutrition, 1:416-421, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.55
  43. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, et al. : Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J, 26:915-923, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.915
  44. Hannig M : Transmission electron microscopy of early plaque formation on dental materials in vivo. Eur J Oral Sci, 107:55-64, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107109.x
  45. Hotta M, Morikawa T, Tamura D, Kusakabe S : Adherence of Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans to saliva-coated S-PRG resin blocks. Dent Mater J, 33:261-267, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-242

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Cariogenicity of Bovine Milk and Low-fat Milk on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm vol.44, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.2.170