Behavior patterns of patients with oral mucosal disease

구강점막질환 환자의 행동패턴 연구

  • Ok, Soo-Min (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hee (Dept. of Oral Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University) ;
  • Jeon, Hye-Mi (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Heo, Jun-Young (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ahn, Yong-Woo (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Sung-Hee (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 옥수민 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김경희 (인제대학교 부산백병원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 전혜미 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 허준영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 안용우 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 정성희 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실)
  • Received : 2014.06.17
  • Accepted : 2014.11.13
  • Published : 2014.12.01

Abstract

There are many causes of oral mucosal diseases, so accordingly, there are various treatments available. The most commonly used agents include adrenocortical hormones, antifungals, antivirals, antibacterials, and immunosuppressants. However, it must also be noted that improving oral hygiene and nutrition, and reducing stress are effective in symptom relief. Furthermore, patients with existing diseases of the oral mucosa should avoid behavior that may cause an increase in pain. Unfortunately, many patients are unaware of the activities that may lead to increased pain and therefore do not avoid these activities. The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze the behavior of patients with oral mucosal disease with regard to activities that led to increase pain. This cross-sectional study was performed on a sample of patients with oral mucosal disease selected from the Oral Medicine Clinic of the Pusan National Hospital during March to August 2013. These patients were randomly selected. From a total of 479 patients, 116 patients with mucosal disease were selected and 73 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Data were collected by using self-completed questionnaires. The results were as follows: Mean score of Question 13 (Not smoking) is $2.47{\pm}1.11$. Mean score of Question 11 (Not drinking alcohol or not using mouthwash containing alcohol) is $2.22{\pm}1.15$. The other questions resulted in scores lower than 1.5. The answers to the questions were scored according to the following assigned numerical values: not keeping = score of 0; little keeping = score of 1; often keeping = score of 2; always keeping = score of 3. In conclusion, patients with oral mucosal diseases unknowingly engage in activities that result in an increase in pain. Therefore, they need to be educated about how to behave to protect oral mucosal lesion.

Keywords

References

  1. Shi J, Zhang G, Wu H, Ross C, Blecha F, Ganz T. Porcine epithelial ${\beta}$-defensin 1 is expressed in the dorsal tongue at antimicrobial concentrations. Infect Immun 1999;67(6):3121-7
  2. Naser AA. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis may be initiated by traumatic epithelial implantation and sustained by localized pathergic status. Medical Hypotheses 2008; 70:522-524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.06.034
  3. Tongyu CW, Olivera S, Marjana T. Epidermal Differentiation in Barrier Maintenance and Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care. 2014;3(3):272-280. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0503
  4. Petrulyte S. Advanced textile materials and biopolymers in wound management. Dan Med Bull. 2008;55(1):72-7.
  5. Cullen B, Smith R, McCulloch E, Silcock D, Morrison L. Mechanism of action of Promogran, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10:16-25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10703.x
  6. Guarnera G, Restuccia A. Promogran and complex surgical lesion: a case report. J Wound Care. 2004;13:237-239. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2004.13.6.26628
  7. Nwomeh BC, Yager DR, Cohen IK. Physiology of the chronic wound. Clin Plast Surg. 1998;25:341-356.
  8. Hom DB. Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngology. 1999;121:591-598
  9. Catalfamo L, Belli E, Nava C, Mici E, Calvo A, D'Alessandro B, De Ponte FS. Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:3883-6.
  10. 통계청 자료, 사회조사보고서 : 2012년 사회조사 보고서/ IV.통계표 /보건(health) 3-1.흡연 및 흡연량(20세 이상).
  11. 통계청 자료, 사회조사보고서 : 2012년 사회조사 보고서/ IV.통계표 /보건(health) 5-1.음주 및 음주횟수(20세 이상).
  12. Galan D, Brecx M, Heath MR. Oral health status of a population of community-dwelling older Canadians. Gerodontology. 1995;12(1):41-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.1995.tb00129.x
  13. Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Use of saliva substitutes in patients with xerostomia. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2002;112(10):1037-58.
  14. Olsson H, Ax?ll T. Objective and subjective efficacy of saliva substitutes containing mucin and carboxymethylcellulose. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99(4):316-9.
  15. Crispian S. Oral and maxillofacial medicine, 2013, Churchill livingstone, pp.39-41
  16. Haytac MC, Oz IA. Atypical streptococcal infection of gingiva associated with chronic mouth breathing. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(10):E577-82.
  17. Mizutani S, Ekuni D, Tomofuji T, Azuma T, Kataoka K, Yamane M, Iwasaki Y, Morita M. Relationship between xerostomia and gingival condition in young adults. J Periodontal Res. 2014 Apr 4. doi: 10.1111/jre.12183.
  18. Ohara Y, Yoshida N, Kono Y, Hirano H, Yoshida H, Mataki S, Sugimoto K. Effectiveness of an oral health educational program on community-dwelling older people with xerostomia.Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014 May 6. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12301.