DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Chaos Theory: An Alternative for a Paradigm Shift in the Social Science Studies

사회과학연구 패러다임 변화대안으로서의 카오스 이론

  • Kim, Min Sun (School of Business Administration, Hyupsung University)
  • 김민선 (협성대학교 경영대학 관광유통경영학부)
  • Received : 2014.10.21
  • Accepted : 2014.11.06
  • Published : 2014.11.30

Abstract

Social phenomena require the fundamentals of novel scientific epistemology and methodology due to the continual change by complex variables. A systematic understanding of paradigm shifts is also necessary for analyzing the problems currently faced in society. This study presents chaos theory, which was developed from the natural sciences, to discuss the abnormality of modern society that underscores the importance of the chaos paradigm. Chaos theory is applicable to diverse social phenomena that stretches across politics, economics, and sociology. If social science research can appropriately and effectively develop and apply chaos theory, the theory can be utilized as a useful paradigm to reinforce the fundamentals of epistemology and methodology in exploring social phenomena.

사회현상은 복잡한 변수들에 의해서 변화되고 있기 때문에 새로운 과학적 인식론과 방법론의 기초가 요구되며, 우리가 직면한 문제들을 분석하기 위해서는 패러다임 전환의 체계적 이해가 필요하다. 본 연구는 자연과학에서 발전시킨 카오스 이론을 제시하여 현대 사회의 비정상성을 논함으로써 카오스 패러다임의 중요성을 제안하였다. 카오스 이론은 정치, 경제, 그리고 사회학의 주제를 가로지르는 광범위하고 다양한 사회현상에도 적용된다. 사회과학 연구에서 카오스 이론을 유효적절하게 개발하고 응용한다면, 사회현상을 탐구하기 위한 방법론적 및 이론적 기초를 강화하기 위한 수단으로서 유용한 패러다임의 역할을 수행하게 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashmos, D.P., Duchon, D., and McDaniel, Jr, R.R., "Organizational Response to Complexity", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2000, pp.577-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810010378597
  2. Bernal, J.D., Science in History, Vol. 4, The Social Sciences: Conclusion, England: Penguin Books, 1965, p.1019.
  3. Bertalanffy, L.V., General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, George Braziller, Inc., 1968.
  4. Bolland, K.A., "Knowledge Building - Chaos Theory: An Alternative Approach to Social Work Practice and Research", Families in Society: The Journal of Con, Vol. 80, No. 4, 1999.
  5. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G., Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London: Heinemann, 1979.
  6. Capra, F., The Web of Life, Brockman Inc., NY, 1996.
  7. Cavanaugh, J.C., & McGuire, L.C., Chaos Theory as a Framework for Understanding Adult Lifespan Learning, In J.Sinnott(Ed.), Interdisciplinary Handbook of Adult Learning, Westport, CT; Greenwood Press, 1994, pp.14-15.
  8. Choi CH., Sociology of Organization: Focused on Organization-environment Theory, Seoul: Hakmoon-Publishing, 1996.
  9. Choi CH., "Search for the Application of Complexity Theory to Organization Management", Korean Public Administation Review, Vol. 33 No. 4, 1999, pp.19-38.
  10. Choi, SK., "The Critique of Social Scientific Paradigm based on Philosophical Viewpoints of B.F. Skinner's Behaviorism", Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2000, pp.1-25.
  11. Cohen, B., The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences: Some Critical and Historical Perspectives, Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1994. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3391-5
  12. Duffy, J.A., "The Application of Chaos Theory to the Career-plateaued Worker", Journal of Employment Counseling, Alexandria, Dec 2000.
  13. Duke, Marshall P., "Chaos Theory and Psychology: Seven Propositions, Genetic", Social, and General Psychology, Vol. 120, No. 3, 1994.
  14. Euel, E., & Douglas, K.L., Chaos: Theory in Social Sciences, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1996.
  15. Giddens, A., Capitalism and Modern Social Theory, Cambridge, 1971; transl., Lim YI. & Park NY., Seoul: Hangil-Publishing, 1981.
  16. Gleick J., Chaos: Making a New Science. Heineman, London, 1987.
  17. Hall, S., et. al.,(eds.), Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
  18. Harrod, R.F., What is the Social Science?; transl., Kim JW., Seoul: Shimgu-dang Publication, 1980.
  19. Holling, C.S. & Sanderson, S., Comparing Ecological and Social Systems, Rights to Nature, Ed. S. Hanna, Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1994.
  20. Hoover, K., & Donovan, T., The Elements of Social Scientific Thinking, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995.
  21. Jantsch, E., The Self-Organizing Universe, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1984.
  22. Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgment, transl., Werer S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis, Ind., 1987.
  23. Kim, JC., Kim YN., Yoo DK., Park JH., Cha SH., Park MS., & Joo WD., "The Crisis of Paradigm in Modern Social Science", Social Sciences Studies, Vol. 5, 1997.
  24. Koh, YJ., "The Chaos Theory: A New Approach for the Developmental Psychology", The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1997.
  25. Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nded., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
  26. Kippenberger, T., "Is This Chaos, at least in Theory?", The Antidote, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1999, pp.64-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006657
  27. Lee KM., & Choi CH., "A Comparative Study of the Doism and the Chaos Theory: Focused on Organization Management", Journal of Local Government Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2002, pp.275-294.
  28. Lee YP., Social Science Studies and The New Paradigm, Seoul National University Press, 1999.
  29. Mouck, T, Capital Markets Research and Real World Complexity: The Emerging Challenge of Chaos Theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1998; Pergamon Press.
  30. Overman, E.S., "The New Sciences of Administration: Chaos and Quantum Theory," Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 5, 1996, pp.487-491. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/977050
  31. Parsons, T., The Social System, Taylor and Francis Group, 2005.
  32. Pozatek, E., "The Problem of Certainty: Clinical Social Work in the Postmodern Era", Social Work, Vol. 39, 1994.
  33. Prigogine, I., The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature, New York: The Free Press, 1996.
  34. Rho WJ., "Chaos Theory: Implications for Policy Studies", Korean Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1998.
  35. Roth, G., & Schwegler, H., Self-Organization, Emergent Properties and the Unity of the World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
  36. Sanders, TI., Strategic Thinking and the New Science: Planning in the Midst of Chaos Complexity and Change, The Free Press, NY, 1998.
  37. Skinner, B.F., "Can Psychology be a Science of Mind?", American Psychologist, Vol. 45, 1990, pp.1206-1210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.11.1206
  38. Skrtic, T.M., Behind Special Education, J. Denver, Co: Love Publishing Co., 1991.
  39. Stacy, R.D, Managing Chaos, Kogan Page Publishers, Ltd., London, 1992.
  40. Toffler, A., 'Introduction,' I. Prigogine and Stengers, Order out of Chaos, NY: Bantam, 1984.
  41. Trippi, R.R., "Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics in the Financial Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Applications", International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1997; NorthHolland.
  42. Vandervert, Larry R., "Chaos Theory and the Evolution of Consciousness and Mind: A Thermodynamic-holographic Resolution to the Mind-body Problem", New Ideas in Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1995; Pergamon Press.
  43. Vandervert, Larry R., "Chaos Theory and Neurological Positivism", Clarifications: A Reply to Newman, Bickhard, Alexander and Globus, New ideas in Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1995; [Online/ScienceDirect]; Pergamon Press.
  44. Wallerstein et al., Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences, Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1996.
  45. Wallerstein, "Social Science and Contemporary Society: The Vanishing Guarantees of Rationality", International Sociology, Vol. 11, No. 1, March 1996, pp.17-23.
  46. Warren, Keith, "New Directions in Systems Theory: Chaos and Complexity", Social Work, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sw/43.4.357
  47. Keith Warren, Cynthia Franklin, and Calvin L Streeter, 'New Directions in Systems Theory: Chaos and Complexity', Social Work, New York, July 1998.
  48. Wieland-Burston, J., Chaos and Order in the World of the Psyche, New York: Routledge, 1992.
  49. Yook YH., "Debating Constructivism", Korean Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1998, pp.171-186.