Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

  • 제44권5호
  • /
  • Pages.216-221
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2093-2278(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-2286(eISSN)
대한치주과학회 (Korean Academy of Periodontology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Junho (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yun, Ji-Young (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Um, In-Woong (R&D Institute, Korea Tooth Bank)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.10
  • 심사 : 2014.08.20
  • 발행 : 2014.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This retrospective study compares the amount of bone resorption around implants between an autogenous tooth bone graft (AutoBT) and a synthetic bone graft after a bone-added crestally approached sinus lift with simultaneous implant placements. Methods: In all, 37 patients participated in this study. Seventeen patients were grouped as group I and underwent an AutoBT-added sinus lift using the crestal approach. The remaining 20 patients were grouped as group II and underwent synthetic bone grafting. Both groups received the implant placements simultaneously. Of the 37 participating patients, only 22 patients were included in the final results: Eleven patients of group I and 11 patients of group II. Before the surgery, the distance from the alveolar crest to the sinus floor was measured using panoramic radiography. After the surgery, the distance was measured again from the neck of the implant thread to the most superior border of the added graft materials. Then, the amount of sinus lift was calculated by comparing the two panoramic radiographs. After a year, a panoramic radiograph was taken to calculate the resorption of the bone graft material from the radiograph that was taken after the surgery. The significance of the resorption amount between the two types of graft materials was statistically analyzed. Results: The bone height was increased to an average of 4.89 mm in group I and 6.22 mm in group II. The analysis of panoramic radiographs 1 year after the surgery showed an average bone resorption of 0.76 mm and 0.53 mm, respectively. However, the degree of lifting (P=0.460) and the amount of bone-grafted material resorption (P=0.570) showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Based on this limited study, AutoBT can be considered a good alternative bone graft to a synthetic bone graft in a bone-added sinus lift, when extraction is necessary prior to the surgery.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  2. Buchmann R, Khoury F, Faust C, Lange DE. Peri-implant conditions in periodontally compromised patients following maxillary sinus augmentation: a long-term post-therapy trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:103-10. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100204.x
  3. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H, Stegenga B, Vissink A. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:279- 86. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003279.x
  4. Kim SM, Park JW, Suh JY, Sohn DS, Lee JM. Bone-added osteotome technique versus lateral approach for sinus floor elevation: a comparative radiographic study. Implant Dent 2011;20:465-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31823545b2
  5. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-6, 158 passim.
  6. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  7. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  8. Block MS, Kent JN. Sinus augmentation for dental implants: the use of autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1281-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90185-3
  9. Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Yeo IS, Jin SC, Oh JS, et al. Autogenous teeth used for bone grafting: a comparison with traditional grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014;117:e39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.04.018
  10. Bessho K, Tagawa T, Murata M. Purification of rabbit bone morphogenetic protein derived from bone, dentin, and wound tissue after tooth extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:162-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80204-6
  11. Urist MR, Nakata N, Felser JM, Nogami H, Hanamura H, Miki T, et al. An osteosarcoma cell and matrix retained morphogen for normal bone formation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;(124):251-66.
  12. Urist MR, Mikulski A, Boyd SD. A chemosterilized antigen-extracted autodigested alloimplant for bone banks. Arch Surg 1975;110: 416-28. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360100058011
  13. Yeomans JD, Urist MR. Bone induction by decalcified dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 1967; 12:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90095-7
  14. Ritchie HH, Ritchie DG, Wang LH. Six decades of dentinogenesis research. Historical and prospective views on phosphophoryn and dentin sialoprotein. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106 Suppl 1:211-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1998.tb02178.x
  15. Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, Jin SC, Son JS, Kim SY, et al. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:7442-5. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4857
  16. Kim YK, Yun PY, Lim SC, Kim SG, Lee HJ, Ong JL. Clinical evaluations of OSTEON as a new alloplastic material in sinus bone grafting and its effect on bone healing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86:270-7.
  17. Bae JH, Kim YK, Kim SG, Yun PY, Kim JS. Sinus bone graft using new alloplastic bone graft material (Osteon)-II: clinical evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.047
  18. Kim YK. Development of autogenous teeth bone graft material and clinical evaluation. J Korean Dent Assoc 2011;49:159-69.
  19. Kim GW, Yeo IS, Kim SG, Um IW, Kim YK. Analysis of crystalline structure of autogenous tooth bone graft material: X-Ray diffraction analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;37: 225-8. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.3.225
  20. Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim KW, Kim SG, Um IW. Guide bone regeneration using autogenous teeth: case reports. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;37:142-7. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.2.142
  21. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:778-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198312000-00005
  22. Lee JY, Kim YK, Bae JH, Kim SG. Clinical study of sinus membrane elevation using minimally invasive crestal approach. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Implantol 2008;12:4-16.
  23. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Kim BS, Ong JL. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e21-8.

피인용 문헌

  1. Histological and Histomorphometric Human Results of HA-Beta-TCP 30/70 Compared to Three Different Biomaterials in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation at 6 Months: A Preliminary Report vol.2015, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/156850
  2. Autogenous tooth bone graft block for sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant installation: a technical note vol.41, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.5.284
  3. Applications of Moldable Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft (M-AutoBT) Mixed with Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose for Sinus Lifting vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.24.391
  4. Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation? vol.27, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002932
  5. Space maintenance in autogenous fresh demineralized tooth blocks with platelet-rich plasma for maxillary sinus bone formation: a prospective study vol.5, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1886-1
  6. The scaffold microenvironment for stem cell based bone tissue engineering vol.5, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00146k
  7. Demineralized dentin matrix scaffolds for alveolar bone engineering vol.17, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_62_17
  8. Osteogenic Potential of Demineralized Dentin Matrix as Bone Graft Material vol.26, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.26.223
  9. Demineralized Dentin and Enamel Matrices as Suitable Substrates for Bone Regeneration vol.15, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000373
  10. Clinical Efficacy of Tooth-Bone Graft : A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Analysis of Randomized Control Trials and Observational Studies vol.27, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000687
  11. Comparison of Healing of Allograft and Autogenous Bone Implanted in the Skull Defect of Beagle Dog: Preliminary Animal Study vol.22, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180006
  12. Association of Smoking Habits and Height of Residual Bone on Implant Survival and Success Rate in Lateral Sinus Lift: A Retrospective Study vol.44, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-17-00192
  13. A New Tooth Processing Apparatus Allowing to Obtain Dentin Grafts for Bone Augmentation: The Tooth Transformer vol.13, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601913010006
  14. BMP-2 and type I collagen preservation in human deciduous teeth after demineralization vol.17, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800018784230
  15. Efficacy of autogenous teeth for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review vol.23, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02869-1
  16. Influence of different incision designs on bone increment of guided bone regeneration (Bio-Gide collagen membrane +Bio-OSS bone powder) during the same period of maxillary anterior tooth implantation vol.12, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1932209
  17. Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous whole‐tooth versus demineralized dentin grafts: A randomized controlled clinical trial vol.32, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13722
  18. Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts vol.18, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4
  19. Comparison of immunohistochemical analysis on sinus augmentation using demineralized tooth graft and bovine bone vol.47, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.4.269
  20. Prognosis of single tooth implants following alveolar ridge preservation with two recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivery systems vol.21, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01565-5