Investigating Functional Level in Patients with Stroke using ICF Concept

ICF core-set를 이용한 뇌졸중 환자의 기능수행 분석

  • Song, Jumin (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University) ;
  • Lee, Haejung (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University)
  • 송주민 (신라대학교 의생명과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이해정 (신라대학교 의생명과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.15
  • Accepted : 2014.10.14
  • Published : 2014.10.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate level of functioning in patients with stroke using Modified Bathel Index (MBI), World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), and ICF core-set for stroke. Methods: Sixty-four patients with stroke were recruited for this study from nine medical institutes. The ICF core-set for stroke, WHODAS 2.0, and MBI were used to collect subjects' functional levels. ICF core-set was employed here as a standard frame to observe multi-dimension of functioning, that is physiological bodily function, activity and participation (AP) in daily life, and current environmental factors (EF) in patients with stroke. WHODAS 2.0 and MBI were also used in order to have a specific functioning level for subjects. The linkage of each item in WHODAS 2.0 and MBI into the ICF core-set for stroke was examined. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for analysis of their relationships. Results: Functioning level of participants showed moderate resulting from MBI and WHODAS 2.0 ($73.48{\pm}22.27$ and $35.55{\pm}12.53$, respectively). Strong relationship was observed between ICF core-set and WHODAS 2.0, and with MBI. Each item of disability scales was obtained its linkage into ICF in the domain of AP. However, lack of correlation between MBI and ICF in the domain of EF was found due to absence of related factors. Conclusion: MBI was found to be linked mainly into ICF in the domain of AP and to have limited linkage into EF. Therefore, it should be suggested that the ICF concept frame should be used as a multi-dimensional approach to patients with stroke.

Keywords

References

  1. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Genenva: WHO; 2001.
  2. Barak S, Duncan PW. Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3(4):505-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.009
  3. Cieza A, Hilfiker R, Chatterji S et al. The international classification of functioning, disability, and health could be used to measure functioning. J Clin Epidem. 2009;62(9):899-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.019
  4. Srikanth VK, Thrift AG, Saling MM et al. Increased risk of cognitive impairment 3 months after mild to moderate first-ever stroke: A community-based prospective study of nonaphasic english-speaking survivors. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1136-43. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000069161.35736.39
  5. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833-62. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr843oa
  6. WHO. Toward a common language for functioning, disability and health. WHO. 2002.
  7. Campos TF, Rodrigues CA, Farias IM et al. Comparison of instruments for sleep, cognition and function evaluation in stroke patients according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. 2012;16(1):23-9.
  8. Stucki G, Cieza A. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (icf) core sets for rheumatoid arthritis: A way to specify functioning. Ann Rheum Diseases. 2004;63(2):40-5.
  9. Mullis R, Barber J, Lewis M et al. Icf core sets for low back pain: Do they include what matters to patients? J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(5):353-7. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0059
  10. Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J et al. Validation of the "world health organization disability assessment schedule, whodas-2" in patients with chronic diseases. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes. 2010;8:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-51
  11. Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A et al. Adaptation of the modified barthel index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in turkey. Scan J Rehabil Med. 2000;32(2):87-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655000750045604
  12. Kwon YC, Park JH, NO IY. Standardization of korean of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE-K) for use in the elderly. Part ii. Diagnostic validity. . Neuropsychiatric Assoc. 1989;28(3):508-13.
  13. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J et al. Icf core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004(44 Suppl):135-41.
  14. Lee HJ, Kim DJ. Internal consistency and concurrent validity of korean language version of whodas 2.0: 12 item-self administered. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23(6):23-9.
  15. Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS et al. Development of the korean version of modified barthel index (k-mbi): Multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Kor Acad Rehabil Med. 2007;31(3):283-97.
  16. Paanalahti M, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Arndt A et al. Applying the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for stroke framework to stroke survivors living in the community. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(4):331-40. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1110
  17. Kim W, Ahn MR, Kim ES et al. Function and environmental factors analysis using icf (international classification of functioning, disability and health) for people with disabilities. J Kor Acad Rehabil Med. 2008;32(1):100-5.
  18. Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, van de Port IG et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(3):221-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600756257
  19. Lee H, Song J. Analysis of the characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain using the icf concept. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy. 2013;25(5):282-7.
  20. Anaby D, Hand C, Bradley L et al. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(19):1589-98. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.748840
  21. Coenen M, Kus S, Rudolf KD et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures capture functioning aspects and environmental factors important to individuals with injuries or disorders of the hand? J Hand Ther. 2013;26(4):332-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.06.002
  22. An SH, Park DS, Lee SM. The clinical application of icf (international classification of functioning, disability and health) for functional ability analysis of stroke patients. J Kor Soc Occup Ther. 2009;17(4):37-44.