DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Non-Ischemic Perfusion Defects due to Delayed Arrival of Contrast Material on Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

  • Kim, Yeo Koon (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Eun-Ah (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sang Joon (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Cheon, Gi Jeong (Department of Neuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Whal (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Jin Wook (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Jae Hyung (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2013.07.10
  • Accepted : 2013.12.19
  • Published : 2014.04.01

Abstract

Herein we report about the adenosine stress perfusion MR imaging findings of a 50-year-old man who exhibited two different perfusion defects resulting from two different mechanisms after a coronary artery bypass surgery. An invasive coronary angiography confirmed that one perfusion defect at the mid-anterior wall resulted from an ischemia due to graft stenosis. However, no stenosis was detected on the graft responsible for the mid-inferior wall showing the other perfusion defect. It was assumed that the perfusion defect at the mid-inferior wall resulted from delayed perfusion owing to the long pathway of the bypass graft. The semiquantitative analysis of corrected signal-time curves supported our speculation, demonstrating that the rest-to-stress ratio index of the maximal slope of the myocardial territory in question was similar to those of normal myocardium, whereas that of myocardium with the stenotic graft showed a typical ischemic pattern. A delayed perfusion during long graft pathway in a post-bypass graft patient can mimick a true perfusion defect on myocardial stress MR imaging. Radiologists should be aware of this knowledge to avoid misinterpretation of graft and myocardial status in post bypass surgery patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.18.2230
  2. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K, Odaka K, Volz S, Mehilli J, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:864-870 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01829-0
  3. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnackenburg B, Wegscheider K, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108:432-437 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000080915.35024.A9
  4. Su MY, Yang KC, Wu CC, Wu YW, Yu HY, Tseng RY, et al. Firstpass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:633-644 https://doi.org/10.1080/10976640601093661
  5. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:159-168
  6. Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B, Pilz G, Hofling B, Hombach V, et al. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:1292-1300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.05.011
  7. Klein C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kelle S, Schnackenburg B, Graf K, et al. Magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion imaging in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:437-445
  8. al-Saadi N, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Klein C, Fleck E, et al. [Comparison of various parameters for determining an index of myocardial perfusion reserve in detecting coronary stenosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance tomography]. Z Kardiol 2001;90:824-834 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003920170081
  9. Kelle S, Graf K, Dreysse S, Schnackenburg B, Fleck E, Klein C. Evaluation of contrast wash-in and peak enhancement in adenosine first pass perfusion CMR in patients post bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010;12:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-28

Cited by

  1. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping vol.20, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0411
  2. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping vol.4, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2019.00171
  3. Guidelines for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (KOSCI) - Part 3: Perfusion, Delayed Enhancement, and T1- and T2 Mapping vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2020.24.1.1