Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of Meta-analysis Research on Exercise in South Korea

국내 운동 관련 메타분석 논문의 질 평가

  • Song, Youngshin (College of Nursing, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Gang, Moonhee (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Ae (Department of Nursing, Kkottongnae University) ;
  • Shin, In-Soo (Department of Education, College of Education, Jeonju University)
  • 송영신 (충남대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 강문희 (충남대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소) ;
  • 김선애 (꽃동네대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 신인수 (전주대학교 사범대학 교육학과)
  • Received : 2014.03.24
  • Accepted : 2014.07.17
  • Published : 2014.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of meta-analysis regarding exercise using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) as well as to compare effect size according to outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases including the Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), the National Assembly Library and the DBpia, HAKJISAand RISS4U for the dates 1990 to January 2014 were searched for 'meta-analysis' and 'exercise' in the fields of medical, nursing, physical therapy and physical exercise in Korea. AMSTAR was scored for quality assessment of the 33 articles included in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA and ${\chi}^2$-test. Results: The mean score for AMSTAR evaluations was 4.18 (SD=1.78) and about 67% were classified at the low-quality level and 30% at the moderate-quality level. The scores of quality were statistically different by field of research, number of participants, number of databases, financial support and approval by IRB. The effect size that presented in individual studies were different by type of exercise in the applied intervention. Conclusion: This critical appraisal of meta-analysis published in various field that focused on exercise indicates that a guideline such as the PRISMA checklist should be strongly recommended for optimum reporting of meta-analysis across research fields.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoo JY, Oh EG. Level of beliefs, knowledge and performance for evidence-based practice among nurses experienced in preceptor role. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2012;18(2):202-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2012.18.2.202
  2. Shin IS, Park EY. Review of the meta-analysis research in special education and related field. Korean Journal of Physical and Multiple Disabilities. 2011;54(4):157-176. https://doi.org/10.20971/kcpmd.2011.54.4.157
  3. Kim JH, Kim AK. A quality assessment of meta-analyses of nursing in South Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(6):736-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.736
  4. Jang DH, Shin IS. Historical development of meta-analysis as an educational research methodology. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation. 2011;14(3):309-332.
  5. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354(9193):1896-1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
  6. Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C. Evaluating metaanalyses in the general surgical literature: A critical appraisal. Annals of Surgery. 2005;241(3):450-459. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000154258.30305.df
  7. MacDonald SL, Canfield SE, Fesperman SF, Dahm P. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008. The Journal of Urology. 2010;184(2):648-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.127
  8. Dijkman BG, Abouali JA, Kooistra BW, Conter HJ, Poolman RW, Kulkarni AV, et al. Twenty years of meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: Has quality kept up with quantity? The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2010;92(1):48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.i.00251
  9. De Vito C, Manzoli L, Marzuillo C, Anastasi D, Boccia A, Villari P. A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology. Vaccine. 2007;25(52):8794-8806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.034
  10. Melchiors AC, Correr CJ, Venson R, Pontarolo R. An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2012;34(1):32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9592-0
  11. Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2011;14(3):116-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x
  12. Suebnukarn S, Ngamboonsirisingh S, Rattanabanlang A. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics. Journal of Endodontics. 2010;36(4):602-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.019
  13. Kim YK. A review of the meta-analysis in major academic journal of business management in Korea. Korea Journal of Business Administration. 2010;23(4):1833-1858.
  14. Suh MO. The review of meta-analysis and research methodology proposed. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 2011;49(2):1-23.
  15. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1995;48(1):167-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00172-M
  16. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;283(15):2008-2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
  17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(10):1006-1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
  18. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Singer J, Goldsmith CH, Hutchison BG, Milner RA, et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1991;44(1):91-98.
  19. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007;7:10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
  20. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62(10):1013-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
  21. Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Son HJ, et al. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency; 2011.
  22. Matjasko JL, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Massetti GM, Holland KM, Holt MK, Cruz JD. A systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: Common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2012;17(6):540-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.006
  23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  24. Burda BU, Norris SL, Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Smith ME. Quality varies across clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40-49 years as assessed by AGREE and AMSTAR instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(9):968-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.005
  25. Lee MH, Baek SS. A meta-analysis of optimal exercise time and frequence for fat loss in overweight elementary school students. The Korean Journal of Elementary Physical Education. 2012;18(2):199-210.
  26. Ho SS, Dhaliwal SS, Hills AP, Pal S. The effect of 12 weeks of aerobic, resistance or combination exercise training on cardiovascular risk factors in the overweight and obese in a randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-704
  27. Davidson LE, Hudson R, Kilpatrick K, Kuk JL, McMillan K, Janiszewski PM, et al. Effects of exercise modality on insulin resistance and functional limitation in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009;169(2):122-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2008.558
  28. Chung CW, Lee S, Hwang SW, Park EH. Systematic review of exercise effects on health outcomes in women with breast cancer. Asian Nursing Research. 2013;7(3):149-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2013.07.005
  29. Sung KS, Yoon YM, Kim EJ. Meta-analysis of the effects of obesity management program for children. Child Health Nursing Research. 2013;19(4):262-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2013.19.4.262
  30. McCartney K, Rosenthal R. Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development. 2000;71(1):173-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00131

Cited by

  1. Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses on the Elderly in Korea vol.28, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2014.28.4.349
  2. AMSTAR를 활용한 국내 한의학 관련 체계적 문헌고찰 논문의 질 평가 vol.13, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2015.13.10.549
  3. 국내 사회복지 관련 메타분석 연구의 질 평가 vol.17, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.10.158
  4. 국내 근거기반간호연구의 동향 vol.23, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2017.23.4.385
  5. The Feature of the Program components in the Meta Analysis Research: Evidence Based Program Development Perspective vol.49, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2018.49.3.247
  6. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses in the Field of Korean Occupational Therapy Using the Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy vol.28, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14519/kjot.2020.28.3.06
  7. A Methodological Quality Evaluation of Meta-Analyses on Nursing Home Research: Overview and Suggestions for Future Directions vol.19, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010505