DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Poster Presentations on Academic Knowledge Transfer from the Oncologist Perspective in Turkey

  • Arslan, Deniz (Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Teaching and Research Hospital) ;
  • Koca, Timur (Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Teaching and Research Hospital) ;
  • Tastekin, Didem (Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University) ;
  • Basaran, Hamit (Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Teaching and Research Hospital) ;
  • Bozcuk, Hakan (Department of Medical Oncology, Akdeniz University)
  • Published : 2014.10.11

Abstract

Background: Currently poster presentations offer a common visual medium for knowledge transfer by a wide range of health professionals. Our study aimed to determine the scientific importance of poster presentations for Medical and Radiation Oncologists. Methods: A survey form including 40 questions was distributed to a total of 131 oncologists experienced in poster presentations. One hundred completed survey forms were included in the study. Descriptive statistics and modified thematic analyses were performed on the responses. Results: Overall 64% of the participants agreed that posters were a good medium for knowledge transfer. Some 88% agreed that concise and clear styled presentations would increase appealing interests for poster contents. Visual appearance was cited more influential than content of the subject; 70% of participants agreed that appearances of posters could help to draw more viewer attention. Of respondents, 63% believed that posters accompanied by their author were more attractive for congress attendees, and 33% of them declared that the halo effect of the poster presenter was also important. Conclusion: The present study indicated that intelligibility, appearance and visuality of posters are most important factors from the aspect of oncologist participants. Presenters must take into account these important points when preparing their academic posters.

Keywords

References

  1. Berg J (2005). Creating a professional poster presentation: focus on nurse practitioners. J American AcadNurse Practitioners, 17, 245-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2005.0041.x
  2. Balistreri WF (2002). Giving an effective presentation. J Ped Gastroenteral Nutr, 35, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200207000-00001
  3. Bordage G (1994). Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med, 69, 883-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199411000-00004
  4. Bryant H, Shin RH, Forman D, et al (2012). Managing population health to prevent and detect cancer and non-communicable diseases. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 13, 13-22.
  5. Cannon G, Gupta P, Gomes F, et al (2012). Prevention of cancer and non-communicable diseases. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 13, 3-11.
  6. De Maria AN (2010). Whither the Oral Abstract Presentation. JACC, 55, 1752-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.015
  7. De Simone R, Rodrian J, Osswald B, et al (2001). Initial experience with a new communication tool: the 'Digital Interactive Poster Presentation'. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 19, 953-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00694-7
  8. Dogan E, Durmusoglu M, Erdag TK (2013). Publication rates of presentations which were presented at Turkish National Rhinology Congresses. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg, 23, 283-7.
  9. Donnelly W J(1997). The language of medical case histories. Ann Intern Med, 127, 1045-8. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00035
  10. Dumville JC, Petherick ES, Cullum N (2008).When will I see you again? The fate of research findings from international wound care conferences. Int Wound J, 5, 26-33.
  11. Goodhand JR, Giles CL, Wahed M (2011). Poster presentations at medical conferences: an effective way of disseminating research? Clin Med, 11, 138-41. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.11-2-138
  12. Haber RJ, Lingard LA (2001). Learning oral presentation skill: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. J Gen Intern Med, 16, 308-14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00233.x
  13. Lingard L, Haber RJ (1999). Teaching and learning communication in medicine; A rhetorical approach. Acad Med, 74, 507-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199905000-00015
  14. Rice P, Ezzy D (1999). Qualitative Research Methods South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  15. Rowe N, Il D (2009). What impact do posters have on academic knowledge transfer? A pilot survey on author attitudes and experiences. BMC Medical Education, 9, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-71
  16. Rowe N, Ilic D (2009). Innovating professional knowledge transfer: from academic poster to 'MediaPoster'. Medical Education, 43, 496.
  17. Sarwal K, Trapido EJ, Sutcliffe S, et al (2013). Impact and evaluation of international cancer control congresses. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 14, 1159-63 https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.2.1159
  18. Smith P, Fuller G, Dunstan F (2004). Scoring posters at scientific meetings: first impressions count. J Royal Soc Med, 97, 340-1. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.97.7.340
  19. Sutcliffe SB (2012). The 4th International Cancer Control Congress. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 13, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.1.001