Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment (생태와환경)

The Korean Society of Limnology (한국수생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Value of Ecosystem Services based on Land Use in Shinangun, Jeonnam, Korea

전남 신안군의 토지이용에 따른 생태계서비스 가치와 지속가능한 활용방안

  • Kim, Jae-Eun (Institution for Marine and Island Cultures, Mokpo National University)
  • 김재은 (목포대학교 도서문화연구원)
  • Received : 2014.09.01
  • Accepted : 2014.09.15
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

More than half of all the tidal flats and islands in South Korea are located in Jeonnam. Shinangun accounts for a large amount of these tidal flats and island. This study assessed the value of ecosystem services for 14 administrative units (2 'eup' and 12 'myeon') that have around 1,000 islands in Shinangun, using the method described by Costanza et al. (1997). The assessment involved examining the land use types in Shinangun in relation to ecosystem services value. The finding showed that the tidal flat areas had the highest value of ecosystem services in most of the islands of Shinangun, in particular in Aphae-eup and Jido-eup. The study illustrates how quantitative analysis of land use patterns can help local governments like Shinangun to formulate policy for conservation and sustainaable use of ecosystem services. Especially, tidal flat areas are unique and fragile ecosystem, so it is very importat to make strategies for sustainable development in bioculturally diverse areas. Some suggestions regarding landscape planning in Shinangun are provided.

전라남도는 우리나라에서 50% 이상을 차지하는 섬과 갯벌을 가지고 있다. 특히 그중에서도 신안군은 가장 많은 섬 개수와 넓은 갯벌을 차지하고 있다. 신안군은 2개읍, 12면으로 구성되어 있고 약 1,000여개의 유 무인도 섬들이 산재해 있다. 섬과 갯벌이라는 독특한 생태계 특성을 가진 신안군의 생태계서비스 가치를 Costanza et al. (1997)의 생물군계에 의해 계산하였다. 신안군은 갯벌이 가장 높은 생태계서비스 가치를 나타내었다. 이러한 결과는 대부분의 섬에서 같은 결과를 보였고 특히 압해읍과 지도읍이 가장 높은 값을 보였다. 증도면의 경우에는 실제적으로 군내에서는 면적이 11위에 해당하지만 생태계서비스 가치는 전체에서 4위를 나타내었다. 현재까지의 연구 상황으로는 정확하게 생태계서비스 가치를 계산하는 것이 어렵지만 대략의 가치라도 측정해 보는 것도 중요하다고 판단된다. 신안군 전체의 생태계 서비스 가치를 살펴봄으로써 현재 가지고 있는 가치를 잘 보전하고 지속적으로 활용하기 위한 정책에 활용하는 것이 필요하다. 특히 갯벌이라는 독특한 생태계를 잘 보전하고 이를 올바르게 활용할 수 있는 시스템 구축이 절실하다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 앞으로 신안군 발전계획 등의 정책결정에 좋은 자료를 제공하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S.E. 2013. Definition and classification of ecosystem services for decision making. Journal of Environmental Policy 12: 3-16.
  2. Chung, M.G. and H. Kang. 2013. A review of ecosystem service studies: concept, approach, and future work in Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment 36: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.001
  3. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge., R. De Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Sutton and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  4. Daily, G.C. (Ed). 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington D.C.
  5. Daily, G.C., S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P.M. Kareiva, H.A. Mooney, L. Pejchar, T.H. Ricketts, J. Salzman and R. Shallenberger. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to delive. Front Ecological Environment 7: 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025
  6. de Groot, R.S., M.A. Wilson and R.M.J. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuatyion of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  7. de Groot, R.S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7: 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  8. Fisher, B. and R.K. Turner. 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation 141: 1167-1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019
  9. Hong, S.K. 2012. Ecogeographical island homogeneity and heterogeneity - communication of Haui-myeon and Shinui-myeon in Shinan Dadohae, South Korea. Journal of the Island Culture 40: 375-395.
  10. Hong, S.K. 2012. Tidal-flat islands in Korea: Exploring biocultural diversity. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures 1: 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2012.04.001
  11. Hong, S.K., C.-H. Koh, R.R. Harris, J.-E. Kim, J.-S. Lee and B.-S. Ihm. 2010. Land use in Korean tidal wetlands: Impacts and management strategies. Environmental Management 45: 1014-1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0164-3
  12. Hong, S.K. and J.E. Kim. 2011. Ecological value and sustainable use of natural resources of islands in South-Western Korea, Journal of the Island Culture 38: 331-358.
  13. Hong, S.K., J.E. Kim, K.H. Oh and H.S. Ihm. 2013. Ecological value of tidal-flat island in Jeonnam Province and its validity for designating Provincial Park. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 46: 41-52. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2013.46.1.041
  14. Kim, G.O. 2013. The Dike-Constraution and management through Chunjinunsugyegi (前津堰修契記) of Anjwado in 19th and 20th Century. Jangseogak (藏書閣) 30: 10-42.
  15. Kim, J.E. 2011. Ecosystem services and environmental policies on islands. Journal of the Island Culture 37: 267-281.
  16. Kim, J.E. 2013. Land use management and cultural value of ecosystem services in Southwestern Korean islands. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures 2: 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2013.06.002
  17. Kim, J.E. 2013. The analysis of public perception associated with island policies in Korean Government. The Journal of Korean Island 25: 41-59.
  18. Kim, J.E., S.K. Hong and N. Nakagoshi. 2006. Changes in patch mosaics and vegetation structure of rural forested landscapes under shifting human impacts in South Korea. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2: 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-006-0001-0
  19. Kim, J.S. and S.Y. Park. 2013. A prediction and analysis for functional change of ecosystem in south Korea. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 16: 114-128. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2013.16.2.114
  20. Koh, D.H. 2001. The Korean tidal flat: Environment, Biology and Human. Seoul National University Press, Seoul.
  21. Korea Marine Environment Management Corporation. https://www.koem.or.kr/
  22. Lee, H.-J., K.-M. Cho, S.-K. Hong, J.-E. Kim, K.-W. Kim, K.-A. Lee and K.-O. Moon. 2010. Management plan for UNESCO Shinan Dadohae Biosphere Reserve (SDBR), Republic of Korea: intergrative perspective on ecosystem and human resources. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 32: 95-103.
  23. MA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington D.C.
  24. Metzger, M.J., M.D.A. Rounsevell, L. Acosta-Michlik, R. Leemans and D. Schroter. 2005. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture Ecosystem & Environment 114: 69-85.
  25. Millenium Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, Island Press, Washington DC.
  26. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2013. Basic Research of Marine Ecosystem in Korea 2006-2013.
  27. Moon, B.C. 2006. A study on the formation and change of dwelling conditions in Jeung-Do (Islands) using GIS. Journal of the Island Culture 28: 51-73.
  28. Moon, B.C. and H.W. Park. 2003. A study on impact and landscape change by the land reclamation using GIS in the islands-Focusd on Sinan Gun (Bigum Island). The Geographical Journal of Korea 37: 307-323.
  29. Oh, K.H., C.H. Chung, S.K. Hong, B.Y. Kang and J.E. Kim. 2013. The plan for evaluation and use of geomorphology, geology and landscape of tidal flat island at Sinangun, Jeollanamdo. The Journal of Korean Island 25: 187-203.
  30. Park, Y.J., S.M. Choi and E.J. Cho. 2013. Structural differenctiation of rural service indusgtries in Korean island areas. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 19: 1-10.
  31. Park, Y.J., S.M. Choi, E.J. Cho, Y.T. Kim and S.Y. Park. 2013. Demographic transition in Eup/Myeon-level island areas in rural Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 19: 11-21.
  32. Shinangun, A statistical Year Book, 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2013.
  33. Troy, A. and M.A. Wilson. 2006. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics 60: 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007
  34. Willemen, L., L. Hein and P.H. Verburg. 2010. Evaluating the impact of regional development policies on future landscape services. Ecological Economics 69: 2244-2254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.012
  35. Zhao, B., U. Kreuter, B. Li, Z. Ma, J. Chen and N. Nakagoshi. 2004. An ecosystem services value assessment of landuse change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy 21: 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.003