DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Affecting the Satisfaction of Simulation Education about Emergency Delivery for Paramedic Students

응급구조학과 학생의 응급분만 시뮬레이션 교육 만족도 영향요인

  • Baek, Mi-Lye (Dept. of Paramedic Science, Korean National University of Transportation)
  • 백미례 (한국교통대학교 응급구조학과)
  • Received : 2014.04.14
  • Accepted : 2014.06.13
  • Published : 2014.10.31

Abstract

This study investigated the confidence, satisfaction, and psychological safety and identified factors affecting the satisfaction of 41 paramedic students. Data, which consists of pre and post-confidence items on visual analogue scale, 21 satisfaction items and 10 psychological safety items was analyzed using SPSS WIN 21.0 program. After the simulation education, the students were told to write what they felt about the education. Then the students' comments, which were categorized as effectiveness and difficulty, were analyzed. Satisfaction of general characteristics showed a significant difference in age (t = -2.22, p = 0.03) and psychological safety of general characteristics showed a significant difference in gender (t = 3.70, p = 0.00) and age (t = -3.65, p = 0.00). Pre-confidence is low (4.37); however, post-confidence increased to 6.22. It showed a significant difference in pre and post-confidence (t = -5.878, p = 0.000). Satisfaction was correlated with psychological safety (r = 0.516, p = 0.001). The variables affecting satisfaction were psychological safety (t = 3.021, p = 0.005) and post-confidence (t = 1.936, p = 0.061). These variables accounted for 27.6% of the satisfaction according to a regression analysis. The simulation education may be the new effective paramedic education strategy of emergency childbirth. Repetitive simulation learning with further development of various scenarios, more education time, and more faculties will be able to train field compatible paramedics.

본 연구는 응급분만 시뮬레이션 교육에 참여한 응급구조학과 학생 41명의 자신감, 심리적 안전감과 만족도를 알아보았다. 시각적 상사 척도로 교육 전후 자신감의 변화를 측정하였고, 21 문항의 교육 만족도 측정도구와 10 문항의 심리적 안전감 측정도구로 분석하였다. 연구결과 일반적 특성에 따른 만족도는 나이(t = -2.22, p = 0.03)에서, 심리적 안전감은 성별(t = 3.70, p = 0.00)과 나이(t = -3.65, p = 0.00)에서 유의한 차이를 나타났다. 시뮬레이션 교육 전 후 자신감은 교육 후 6.22점으로 높아졌고 통계적으로 유의하게 높았다(t = -5.878, p = 0.000). 만족도와 심리적 안전감간은 강한 정의 상관관계(r = 0.516, p = 0.001)가 나타났다. 교육만족도의 영향요인은 심리적 안전감(t = 3.021, p = 0.005)과 교육 후 자신감 (t = 1.936, p = 0.061)으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과 시뮬레이션 교육이 적절한 대안교육임을 알 수 있지만 현장 맞춤형 응급구조사 교육을 위해서는 다양한 시나리오개발, 충분한 인력과 교육시간을 통한 반복교육이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea. "The Press Release about 2013 Temporary Statistical Data of Birth and Death" (2013).
  2. N. Fisher, P. S. Bernstein, A. Satin, S. Pardanani, H. Heo, I. R. Merkatz and D. Goffman, "Resident Training for Eclampsia and Magnesium Toxicity Management: Simulation or Traditional Lecture?", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 203, No. 4, pp. 379.e1-379.e5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.010
  3. D. C. Jude, G. G. Gilbert, D. Magrane and J. C. Edwards, "Simulation Training in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 195, pp. 1489-1492 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.003
  4. S. Deering, S. Poggi, C. Macedonia, R. Gherman and A. J. Satin, "Improving Resident Competency in the Management of Shoulder Dystocia With Simulation Training", American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 1224-1228 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000126816.98387.1c
  5. C. S. Ennen and A. J. Satin, "Training and Assessment in Obstetrics: The Role of Simulation", Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecolog, Vol. 24, pp. 747-758 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.03.003
  6. J. H. Park, E. Jung, J. K. Ko and H. B. Yoo, "Delivery Traing for Undergraduate Medical Students using Birth Simulator", Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 950-956 (2008).
  7. W. S. Lee and M. O. Kim, "Effects and Adequency of High-fidelity Simulation-based Training for Obstetrical Nursing", Journal Korean Academic Nursing, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 433-443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433
  8. C. W. Chung, H. S. Kim and Y. S. Park, "Effects of High-fidelity Simulation-based Education on Maternity Nursing", Perspectives in Nursing Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 86-96 (2011).
  9. M. L. Baek, "A Phenomenological Study of Paramedic Student's Experience on Simulation", Korean Journal Emergency Medical Service, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 63-75 (2012).
  10. M. L. Baek, "EMT Student's Simulation Experience", Journal of KSSSS, Vol. 23, pp. 115-130 (2011).
  11. B. E. Bledsoe, R. S. Porter and R. A.Cherry, "Paramedic Care: Principle & Peactice, Medical Emergency", Brady Prentice Hall Health Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2001).
  12. A. K. Kuznar, "Associate Degree Nursing Students' Perceptions of Learning using a High-fidelity Human Patient Simulator", Teaching and Learning in Nursing, No. 2, pp. 46-52 (2007).
  13. B. J Ganey and L. P. Luannard, "Academic Safety During Nursing Simulation: Perceptions of Nursing Students and Faculty", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, pp. e1-e9 (2010).
  14. S. A. Kim, S. K. Lee and H. J. Chae, "Effects of Clinical Practice and Simulation-Based Practice for Obstetrical Nursing", Korean Journal Women Health Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.180-189 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2012.18.3.180
  15. A. Abdo and P. Ravert, "Student Satisfaction with Simulation Experience", Clinical Simulation in Nursing Education, No. 2, pp. 13-16 (2006).
  16. C. F. Swenty and B. M. Eggleston, "The Evaluation of Simulation in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, No. 2, pp. 1-7 (2010).
  17. A. Abdo and P. Ravert, "Student Satisfaction with Simulation Experiences", Clinical Simulation in Nursing Education, No. 2, pp. 13-16 (2006).
  18. H. K. Oh and Y. I. Han, "Effects of Simulation-based Training on Stress and Self-efficacy in Nursing Students", J. of Korean Soc. of School Health, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 33-40 (2011).
  19. J. Schepers, A. D. Jong and K. D. Ruyter, "Psychological Safety and Social Support in Group Ware Adoption: A Multi-level Assessment in Education", Computer & Education, No. 51, pp. 757-775 (2008).