Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.405-429
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of structural behavior of Bosporus suspension bridge considering construction stages and different soil conditions

  • Gunaydin, Murat (Gumushane University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Adanur, Suleyman (Karadeniz Technical University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Altunisik, Ahmet Can (Karadeniz Technical University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Sevim, Baris (Yildiz Technical University, Civil Engineering Department) ;
  • Turker, Emel (Karadeniz Technical University, Civil Engineering Department)
  • 투고 : 2011.08.15
  • 심사 : 2014.03.17
  • 발행 : 2014.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, it is aimed to determine the structural behavior of suspension bridges considering construction stages and different soil conditions. Bosporus Suspension Bridge connecting the Europe and Asia in Istanbul is selected as an example. Finite element model of the bridge is constituted using SAP2000 program considering existing drawings. Geometric nonlinearities are taken into consideration in the analysis using P-Delta large displacement criterion. The time dependent material strength of steel and concrete and geometric variations is included in the analysis. Time dependent material properties are considered as compressive strength, aging, shrinkage and creep for concrete, and relaxation for steel. To emphases the soil condition effect on the structural behavior of suspension bridges, each of hard, medium and soft soils are considered in the analysis. The structural behavior of the bridge at different construction stages and different soil conditions has been examined. Two different finite element analyses with and without construction stages are carried out and results are compared with each other. At the end of the analyses, variation of the displacement and internal forces such as bending moment, axial forces and shear forces for bridge deck and towers are given in detail. Also, displacement and stresses for bridge foundation are given with detail. It can be seen from the analyses that there are some differences between both analyses (with and without construction stages) and the results obtained from the construction stages are bigger. It can be stated that the analysis without construction stages cannot give the reliable solutions. In addition, soil condition have effect on the structural behavior of the bridge. So, it is thought that construction stage analysis using time dependent material properties, geometric nonlinearity and soil conditions effects should be considered in order to obtain more realistic structural behavior of suspension bridges.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adanur, S. and Gunaydin, M. (2010), "Construction stage analysis of bosporus suspension bridge", Proceeding of 9th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey, September.
  2. Adanur, S., Gunaydin, M., Altunisik, A.C. and Sevim, B. (2012), "Construction stage analysis of Humber Suspension Bridge", Appl. Math. Model., 36(11), 5492-5505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.01.011
  3. Altunisik, A.C. (2010), "Determination of structural behaviour highway bridges using analytical and experimental methods", Ph.D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. [In Turkish]
  4. Altunisik, A.C., Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., Adanur, S. and Domanic, A. (2010), "Construction stage analysis of komurhan highway bridge using time dependent material properties", Struct. Eng. Mech.. Int. J., 36(2), 207-244. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.36.2.207
  5. Ates, S. (2010), "Numerical modelling of continuous concrete box girder bridges considering construction stages", Appl. Math. Model., 35(8), 3809-3820.
  6. Ates, S., Atmaca, B., Yildirim, E. and Demiroz, N.A. (2013), "Effects of soil-structure interaction on construction stage analysis of highway bridges", Comput. Concrete, 12(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2013.12.2.169
  7. Brownjohn, J.M.W., Magalhaes, F., Caetano, E. and Cunha, A. (2010), "Ambient vibration re-testing and operational modal analysis of the Humber Bridge", Eng. Struct., 32(8), 2003-2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.034
  8. CEB-FIP Model Code (1990), Thomas Telford, ISBN: 0727716964.
  9. Cheng, J., Jiang, J.J., Xiao, R.C. and Xia, M. (2003), "Wind-induced load capacity analysis and parametric study of a long-span steel arch bridge under construction", Comput. Struct., 81(26-27), 2513-2524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00304-3
  10. Cho, T. and Kim, T.S. (2008), "Probabilistic risk assessment for the construction phases of a bridge construction based on finite element analysis", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 44(6-7), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2007.12.004
  11. Gunaydin, M., Adanur, S., Altunisik, A.C. and Baris, S. (2012), "Construction stage analysis of Fatih Sultan Mehmet Suspension Bridge" Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 42(4), 489-505. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.4.489
  12. Karakaplan, A., Caner, A., Kurc, O,. Domanic, A. and Lulec, A. (2007), "New strategy in the structural analysis: construction stage", Proceeding of 1st Symposium of Bridges and Viaducts, Antalya, Turkey, November.
  13. Ko, J.M., Xue, S.D. and Xu, Y.L. (1998), "Modal analysis of suspension bridge deck units in erection stage", Eng. Struct., 20(12), 1102-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00207-1
  14. Kwak, H.G. and Seo, Y.J. (2002), "Numerical analysis of time-dependent behaviour of pre-cast pre-stressed concrete girder bridges", Construct. Build. Mater., 16(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00027-7
  15. Pindado, S., Meseguer, J. and Franchini, S. (2005), "The influence of the section shape of box-girder decks on the steady aerodynamic yawing moment of double cantilever bridges under construction", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93(7), 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.05.005
  16. SAP2000 (2008), Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.
  17. Somja, H. and Goyet, V.V. (2008), "A new strategy for analysis of erection stages including an efficient method for creep analysis", Eng. Struct., 30(10), 2871-2883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.015
  18. Soyluk, K., Diri, T.G. and Sicacik, E.A. (2010), "Time dependent nonlinear analysis of segmentally erected cable-stayed bridges", Proceeding of 9th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey, September.
  19. Wang, P.H., Tang, T.Y. and Zheng, H.N. (2004), "Analysis of cable-stayed bridges during construction by cantilever methods", Comput. Struct., 82(4-5), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.11.003

피인용 문헌

  1. Structural behavior of non-symmetrical steel cable-stayed bridges vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.447
  2. Stochastic response of suspension bridges for various spatial variability models vol.22, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.5.1001
  3. PC Cable-Stayed Bridge Main Girder Shear Lag Effects: Assessment of Single Cable Plane in Construction Stage vol.2020, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2646513
  4. Blasting Response of a Two-Storey RC Building Under Different Charge Weight of TNT Explosives vol.44, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00256-0
  5. Nondestructive Experimental Measurement, Model Updating, and Fatigue Life Assessment of Çarşamba Suspension Bridge vol.27, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001818