DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sewerage cost recovery alternatives achievable in seoul

서울시 하수도요금 현실화 방안에 관한 연구

  • Oh, Hyuntaek (Department of Accounting, Cheongju University) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Economics, Cheongju University) ;
  • Park, Wankyu (Department of Economics, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Park, Jooyang (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Kyoohong (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
  • 오현택 (청주대학교 회계학과) ;
  • 김성태 (청주대학교 경제학과) ;
  • 박완규 (중앙대학교 경제학과) ;
  • 박주양 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 박규홍 (중앙대학교 사회기반시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2014.07.04
  • Accepted : 2014.10.15
  • Published : 2014.10.15

Abstract

As sewerage systems have obsolete, as quality and service level standards increase, and as rain characteristics change, the sewerage utility authorities are challenged to develop cost recovery strategies that assure financial sustainability. In this study, we conducted scenario analysis to examine the effect of three alternatives of partial or full sewerage cost recovery in Seoul during 2014-30 periods. It turned out that the alternative 1 is optimal and recommended. According to alternative 1, we had better increase annually sewerage fee by 14.8% until 2020 and thereafter apply only the inflation rate in setting sewerage fee. It would gradually decrease the deficit after 2019. The accumulated deficit of 13 billion Won in 2030 was estimated. We expect that this kind of analysis may provide useful informations to help sewage utility staffs, decision makers, and regulatory authorities understand, develop and implement ultimate full cost recovery strategy for many municipalities.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Security and Public Administration (2014). Local Public Enterprise Act and Enforcement Ordinance.
  2. Ministry of Security and Public Administration (2013). Financial Accounting Rules of Local Government.
  3. Kang J. (2012). "Problems and issues of Local Public corporation system", Kyunghee Law Studies, 47(1), 98-130.
  4. Korea Waterworks Management Institute (2013). Report on General Cost Estimating of Sewerage, Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  5. InfraGuide (2006). Water and Sewer Rates : Full Cost Recovery, A Best Practice report published by InfraGuide, Ottawa, Canada.
  6. UAPS( 1999). Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34.
  7. Jeong, S., Cho, S, Hyun, D., and Bae, S. (2012). "Factors affecting local water supply costs and water prices in Korea", Local Administration Studies, 26(3), 287-310.
  8. Francois, D., Correlje, A. F., and Groengewegen P. M., (2010). "Cost recovery in the water supply and sanitation sector; a case of competing policy objectives?", Utility Policy, 18, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2010.03.001
  9. Han, I. (2009). "Performance and tasks of management revolution by reorganizing local public enterprises", Korean Assoiciation of Local Public Enterprises, 5(2), 83-102.
  10. Hansen, A. (2014). "What is behind the water price in Denmark - a comparison between countries", Proceedings of European Utilities Management Conference, 14-16 May, 2014, Oslo, Norway, International Water Association.
  11. Labre, J. (2014). "The cost recovery principle: what clarification are needed?", Proceedings of European Utilities Management Conference, 14-16 May, 2014, Oslo, Norway, International Water Association.
  12. OECD (2009). Managing Water for All - An OECD Perspective on Pricing and Financing.
  13. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2012). Ordinance of Sewerage Use.
  14. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2009). Sewer Rehabilitation Master Plan of Seoul Metropolitan City.
  15. Seoul M etropolitan Government (2014). A Study of Financial Operations Efficiency for Sewerage Project. 51-611000-000866-01.
  16. van Dijk, M. P., Etajak, S., Mwalwega, B., and Ssempebwa, J. (2014) "Financing sanitation and cost recovery in the slums of Dar es Sallam and Kampla", Habitat International, 43, 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.02.003
  17. Zocchi, R. (2014). "3Ts approach for an effective use of the pricing policies", Proceedings of European Utilities Management Conference, 14-16 May, 2014, Oslo, Norway, International Water Association.

Cited by

  1. Exploring Effects of Water Price on Residential Water Demand for Water Management vol.11, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no10.39