DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of College students's Consumer Behavior of the Midwest(Yunnam) in China(Part II): The Consumer's Traits of Market Segmentation Based on the Apparel Benefits

중국 중서부 지역(운남성) 대학생들의 소비자 행동연구(제 2보): 의복추구혜택에 따른 세분시장의 소비자특성

  • Lee, Okhee (Dept. of Fashion Design, Sunchon National University)
  • 이옥희 (순천대학교 패션디자인학과)
  • Received : 2014.06.10
  • Accepted : 2014.09.19
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

This study investigates consumer's traits of market segmentation based on the apparel benefits. The subjects were 302 college students living in Yunnam, China. The mean, ANOVA, factor analysis, Duncan test, and K-means cluster analysis were used for statisticals analysis. The results of this study are as follows. The college students were classified, into six subdivisions, according to the apparel benefits by cluster analysis: indifference group, utility pursuit group, hedonic/brand pursuit group, individuality pursuit group, social recognition/fashion pursuit group, and pursuit benefits-minded group. In the factors of happiness-pursuing and life-centered of materialism, significant differences were found according to the groups of apparel benefits, and all factors of symbolic consumption and brand loyalty were found to have significant differences according to the groups of apparel benefits. The evaluation criteria of clothing were significantly different, depending on apparel benefits subdivision in criteria of aesthetic, socio-psychological, and utility. The use of information was shown to have significant differences, according to the groups of apparel benefits. The study results are highly expected to be utilized as useful sources in marketing plans for the midwest of China.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiken, L. R. (1963). The relationship of dress to selected measures of personality in undergraduate women. Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1963.9919417
  2. An, H., & Lee, J. (2013). A study on outdoor apparel market segmentation by benefits soughtl: Focused on middle school & high school students, Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 22(6), 659-672. https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2013.22.6.659
  3. Bae, Youngjun. (2005). Five syndrome of China consumers' culture. LG Economic Research Institute, 854, 3-7.
  4. Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 291-297.
  5. Belk, R. W., & Zhou, N. (1987). Learning to want things. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 478-481.
  6. Choi, S. (2001). A study on the attitude toward fashion luxury products. The Costume culture Association, 9(6), 842-854.
  7. Choi, S., & Rhee, E. (1994). The types of emotion experienced in the process of wearing clothes. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 18(3), 395-409.
  8. Day, G. S. (1969). A two dimensional concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 9, 29-35.
  9. Evaluation for 10years to China WTO joining. (2011, December 2). KITA. Retrieved July 15, 2013, from http://china.kita.net
  10. Evaluation to light landing criticism of Chinese economy. (2011, August 4). KITA. Retrieved July 16, 2013, from http://china.kita.net
  11. Export extension, the answer make inroads into the domestic market of Chinese. (2013, July 11). MOTIE. Retrieved August 07, 2013, from http://motie.korea.kr
  12. Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumers self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31(10), 22-27.
  13. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization process. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341
  14. Ha, J., & Kim, J. (2009). A study on clothing benefit and its related variables of male and female consumers in their twenties. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 18(4), 879-889. https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2009.18.4.879
  15. Hong, H., & Koh, A. (1996). Interactive effects of usage-situation and personal characteristics on benefit sought of clothing and preference of brand type. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 20(5), 738-752.
  16. Hwang, J. (2003). The internet perceived risk segments: Clothing benefits sought, internet shopping attitude, and internet purchase intention. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(7), 746-757.
  17. Hwang, J. (2008). The relationships among clothing benefits sought, brand attachment, and brand loyalty. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(11), 1704-1714. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.11.1704
  18. Hwang, J., & Yang, J. (2004). The relationships between benefits seeking and brand loyalty of fashion luxury goods. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(6), 862-871.
  19. Jacoby, J., & Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand royalty: Measurement and management. NY: Ronald Press Publication.
  20. Jenkins, M. C., & Dickey, L. E. (1976). Consumer types based on evaluative criteria underlying clothing decisions. Home Economics Research Journal, 4(3), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X7600400301
  21. Jeong, J. (2012). The change and suggestion of china consumers' pattern. Cheju Development Forum, 41, 29-37.
  22. Jin, B. (1991). A study on the determinant variables of brand loyalty related to clothing items (Unpublished master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  23. Kaiser, S. (1985). The social psychology of clothing and personal adornment. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  24. Kang, D., Lee, S., & Whang, S. (2010, November 23). The change and suggestion of China dependant degree of Korea economy after financial crisis. KIET Industrial Economic Review No. 491 Retrieved July 16, 2013, from http://www.kiet.re.kr
  25. Kang, J. (1995). A study on the male consumer's brand perception of men's business suit by benefit segmentation (Unpublished master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  26. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.
  27. Kim, E. (2009). A comparison of the benefits for online clothing purchases between Korean and U. S. consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(7), 1074-1085. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.7.1074
  28. Kim, J., & Hong, K. (2000). A study on shopping orientation and information source by male's clothing benefits. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 24(1), 43-54.
  29. Kim, S., & Koh, A. (2007). A study on the clothing benefits of new generation's married women in China: Focused on vale and lifestyle. Proceedings of 2007 conference of Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (pp. 88-89). Daegu: The Society of Fashion & Textile Industry.
  30. Kim, Y. [Yangha]. (2005). A multi-level analysis of symbolic consumption behavior in Korean society: Based on socio-demographical, individual and social approaches (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chungang University, Seoul, Korea.
  31. Kim, Y. [Yongdeok], & Shin, S. (1998). A study on the high school girl's brand loyalty in casual wear: Focused on the brand discernment and self image. The Journal of The Korean Society of Costume, 39(7), 125-138.
  32. Koh, A., & Hong, H. (1995). Benefit segmentations of the female apparel market in Cheju. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 19(5), 811-825.
  33. Koh, A., Nam, M., & Cho, Y. (2002). A study on apparel benefits and buying behavior according to values and lifestyles. Family and Environment Research, 40(5), 119-132.
  34. Lai, A. W. (1995). Consumer values, product benefits and customer value: A consumption behavior approach. Advances in consumer Research, 22, 381-388.
  35. Lee, H. (1989). Inquired research about symbolic consumer behavior. Hongik Business Review, 12, 209-245.
  36. Lee, J., & Kim C. (2007). Comparison of the purchase criteria and fashion information sources for the middle-aged and elderly women's fashion markets segmented based on benefits sought. Family and Environment Research, 45(5), 39-49.
  37. Lee, M., & Rhee, E. (2010). The effect of independent tendency of single women on consumption values and clothing benefits. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 60(5), 139-156.
  38. Lee, M. (2010). Comparative study between married and unmarried women on consumption values and clothing benefits: Focusing on working women in their 20"s and 30s'. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(5), 808-818. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.5.808
  39. Lee, O. (1997). The effect of materialism, reference group, and social stratification on the symbolic consumption in clothing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chungang University, Ansung, Korea.
  40. Lee, O., & Kang, Y. (2014). A study of college students' consumption behavior from the midwest(Yunnam) in China(Part I): The effects of materialism on the consumers's attitudes and clothing purchase behaviors. Journal of Fashion Business, 18(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2014.18.1.50
  41. Lee, O., & Jo, E. (2000). Materialism and conspicuous consumption in clothing information sources, The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 8(2), 293-304.
  42. Lee, O., & Kim, K. (2003). Benefits segmentation and knitwear purchasing behavior. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(6), 601-611.
  43. Lee, Y. [Yeonjung], & Park, M. (2013). The middle-aged consumers using active wear as casual wear based on the clothing benefits. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 21(5), 765-779. https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2013.21.5.765
  44. Lee, Y. [Yoonjung]. (2007). Male consumers' motives of appearance management behavior: Focused on their sex role identities and benefit sought in clothing. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(4), 551-562. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.4.551
  45. Lim, K. (1998). A study on the information search behavior: Emphasis on the self-image and benefit. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 22(1), 61-71.
  46. Min, D. (1999). Qualitative research about symbolic consumption of clothing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul University, Seoul, Korea.
  47. Moon, T., & Park, S. (2011). Influence of consumers' purchasing selection criteria for golf-wear upon clothing pursuit benefit and purchase satisfaction. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 12(10), 4337-4347. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.10.4337
  48. Nam, M., & Kim, K. (2003). A study on the clothing benefits and the store of information of Korean female university students according to shopping orientation. Family and Environment Research, 41(9), 55-67.
  49. Now, it's consumer's market of China! an end of cheap China. (2013, June 24) Chinese Media & Culture, Retrieved August 19, 2013, from http://hwaryu.com
  50. Paik, K., & Rhee, K. (1993). The effect of materialism and reference group on the conspicuous consumption. Korean Home management Association, 11(2), 1-12.
  51. Park, E., & Ku, Y. (2012). The effects of sociocultural attitude toward appearance and pursuit of clothing benefits on ambivalent consumption of fashion product. Journal of Fashion Business, 16(1), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2012.16.1.137
  52. Park, H., & Ku, Y. (2008). A cross cultural study on the factors influencing on fashion brand loyalty between Korean and American college students: Focused on shopping orientations, clothing attributes evaluation, clothing benefits sought. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 16(5), 910-923. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2008.16.5.910
  53. Park, K., & Soh, M. (2001). A study on materialism and clothing buying behavior, Family and Environment Research, 39(3), 1-10.
  54. Park, N., & Park, J. (2007). Evaluation criteria preferred image of jeans products based on benefit segmentation. Journal of Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(6), 974-984. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.6.974
  55. Park, S. (2011). New wave of China consumers' market. KPMG ERI publications issues monitor 11. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com
  56. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2008) Consumer behavior and marketing strategy (8th ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
  57. Richins, M., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304
  58. Shim, S., & Biekle, M. C. (1994). Benefits segmentation of the female apparel market: Psychographics, shopping orientation and demographics. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 12(2), 1-12.
  59. Sung, Y. (1994). Materialism and types of ostentation consumption. Korean Journal of psychology, Social Issues, 1(1), 69-82.
  60. The temperament, the custom of trade, and feed, lodge, and cloth according to region of Chinese, (2005, October 25) KITA, Retrieved July 16, 2013, from http://china.kita.net
  61. Yu, U., Chung, M., & Jeon, E. (2009). The relationship of masstige clothing benefit seeking and brand loyalty. The Korean Society for clothing Industry, 11(1), 33-40.

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Analysis on the Competitiveness of the Korean, Chinese and Japanese Fashion Industries: The Generalized Double Diamond Model Approach vol.18, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2014.18.6.67
  2. A Study on Brand Preference, Clothing Pursuit Benefits and Purchasing Behavior of Chinese Women vol.20, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2016.20.4.110