References
- Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussion on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
- Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2008). The world cafe: Awakening collective intelligence and committed action, In M. Tovey (Ed.). Collective intelligence: Creating a prosperous world at peace (pp. 47-54). Oakton, VA: Earth Intelligence Network.
- Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
- Cho, H., & Choi, K. (1998). The necessities and current states of educating ethical characteristics of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(4), 559-570.
- Choi, K., & Cho, H. (2002). The teaching/learning procedures and themes for ethical issues in science. Biology Education, 28(4), 408-417.
- Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). 'If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it': A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 96-113.
- Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers' social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<319::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-W
- Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
- Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies: Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Science Education, 87(6), 767-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10081
- Dreyfus, A., & Roth, Z. (1991). Twelfth-grade biology pupils' opinions on interventions of man in nature: Agreement, indifference and ambivalence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280108
- Gan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2007). A learning framework for knowledge building and collective wisdom advancement in virtual learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 206-226.
- Hansen, K. H., & Olson, J. (1996). How teachers construe curriculum integration: The Science, Technology, Society (STS) movement as Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(6), 669-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280603
- Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
- Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
- Jeong, E., & Kim, Y. (2000). Development of a value inquiry model in biology education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), 582-598.
- Leadbeater, C. (2008). We think: Mass innovation, not mass production. London: Profile Books.
- Lee, H., & Chang, H. (2010). Exploration of experienced science teachers' personal practical knowledge of teaching socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 30(3), 353-365.
- Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers' inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 931-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903
- Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of preservice science teachers' moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
- Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
- Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2009). Conceptual design principles of collective intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 213-239.
- Levy, P. (1994). L'intelligence Collective: Pour une anthropologie de cyberspace. Paris: La Decouverte.
- Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
- Michaelson, L. K., Knignt, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small group. Sterling: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
- Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
- Ministry of Education Science Technology (MEST). (2011). Korea national curriculum standards(2011-361). Seoul: MEST.
- Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral-ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues (SSI). In D. Tippins, M. Mueller, M. van Eijck, & J. Adams (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 105--128). New York, NY: Springer.
- Partnership for the 21st Century Skills [P21]. (2009). A framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: P21.
- Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity. New York, NY: Oxford university press.
- Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190203
- Reis, P., & Galvao, C. (2004). The impact of socio-scientific controversies in Portuguese natural science teachers'' conceptions and practices. Research in Science Education, 34, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000033760.04656.a1
- Roth, W. M. (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210134600
- Roth, W. M., & Desautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150409556603
- Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
- Salomon, G. (1996). Studying novel learning environments as patterns of change. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 363-378). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
- Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 903- 927. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016076
- Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Random House.
- Tal, R. T., & Hochberg, N. (2003). Reasoning, problem-solving and reflections: Participating in WISE project in Israel. Science Education International, 14, 3-19.
- Tal, R. T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students' performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615-644.
- Tapscott, D., & Williams, A.D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portfolio.
- Treffinger, D., J., Solomon, M., & Woythal, D. (2012). Four decades of creative vision: Insights from an evaluation of the future problem solving program international (FPSPI). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.14
- Tweney, R. D. (1991). Informal reasoning in science. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Yang, M. (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483.
- Zeidler, D. L., & Kahn, S. (2014). It's debatable!: Using socioscientific issues to develop scientific literacy. Arlington, VA: NSTA press.
- Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering student's knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
Cited by
- Effects of Collective Intelligence-Based SSI Instruction on Promoting Middle School Students' Key Competencies as Citizens vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0431
- The Suggestion of Design Thinking Process and its Feasibility Study for Fostering Group Creativity of Elementary-Secondary School Students in Science Education vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0443
- Development of an Analytical Framework for Dialogic Argumentation in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: Based on Discourse Clusters and Schemes vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0509
- Examining Elementary School Students' Awareness about Socio-scientific Issues and Solutions about Environmental Topics by Using Their Drawings vol.35, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.1.111
- 과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 교육을 위한 교과교육학적 지식(SSI-PCK) 요소에 대한 탐색 vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539
- 합리적 문제해결을 저해하는 인지편향과 과학교육을 통한 탈인지편향 방법 탐색 vol.36, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0935
- 디지털스토리텔링 활동 기반 과학관련 사회쟁점 수업의 교육적 효과에 대한 인식 탐색 vol.37, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0181
- 과학관련 사회쟁점을 활용한 대학생 인성교육의 효과 -개인-집단중심성향에 따른 비교- vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.395
- 과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 토론 수업에서 스마트 기기의 활용 방식과 수업의 특징 vol.37, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.787
- 과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 수업의 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론에서 나타나는 특징 vol.38, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.135
- 협력적 문제해결 중심 교수모델에 기반 한 학생 인성 역량 평가 도구 개발 vol.38, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.3.419
- 플립러닝 기반 SSI 수업이 중학생의 과학기술 사회 시민으로서의 역량 및 인성 함양에 미치는 효과 vol.38, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.4.467
- The development and validation of the GI-ALE instructional model for the emerging collective intelligence of the scientifically gifted student vol.5, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0046-7
- 공과대학 학생을 위한 과학기술관련 사회·윤리 쟁점기반 수업이 인성과 가치관에 미치는 효과 탐색 vol.23, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2020.23.3.3
- Analysis of Argumentation Structure in Students' Writing on Socio-scientific issues (SSI): Focusing on the Unit of Climate Change in High School Earth Science I vol.41, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2020.41.4.405
- A study on the possibility of the relationship among group creativity, empathy, and scientific inquiry ability of elementary school students vol.42, pp.13, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813347
- 과학교육과 지속가능발전교육 접목 프로그램이 고등학생의 세계관에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.253