Introduction
Of the diverse compounds that display antibacterial activities, β-lactams are still considered valuable antibiotics. In particular, the monocyclic β-lactam series1,2 are considered to represent a class of compounds separate from the classical bicyclic β-lactams. Monocyclic β-lactams are known to exhibit unique physical and chemical properties due to their structural features. For examples, monocyclic β- lactam compounds including Aztreonam (1)3 that contains a 1-sulfonate group and a 3-acylamido side chain have been reported to display good antibacterial2,3 and non-antibacterial activities.4,5 These characteristics represent the potential use of the monocyclic β-lactams, as has been previously described in a review paper.6
However, some of the monocyclic β-lactams still suffer from chemical instabilities and narrow spectrum of activities. Despite the extensive efforts to improve these features, much remains unknown. Moreover, further studies are required to determine the effects of substituents on physicochemical and biological properties of these compounds. In this regard, we previously reported the design and synthesis of interesting monocyclic β-lactams 2.7
As a part of our continual work to explore the features of monocyclic β-lactams, we here report the studies on design and synthesis of new monocyclic β-lactam esters 3a and 3b as prodrugs derived from the cleavage of the bicyclic system of penicillin while retaining its substructures.
Results and Discussion
Design and Structural Features of 3a and 3b. We wished to generate new monocyclic β-lactams by the strategy of opening the bicyclic system in penicillin structure. Of the several ways of opening the thiazolidine ring of the penicillin, we focused on cleavage of the C(2)-C(3) bond (path A) and C(3)-N(4) bond (path B). Previously, we described the monocyclic β-lactams 2 obtained by cleavage path A.7 In the present study, we designed new monocyclic β-lactams 3 resulting from cleavage path B, and the retention of all penicillin substructures except the thiazolidine ring system. In particular, there is no substituent at N(1) of the β-lactam ring and this secondary amide structure could cause chemical and metabolic instability, which is of our interest to modulate their stability and reactivity. In addition, compounds 3a and 3b have a phenylacetamido group at C(3) as an acyl side chain, and a secondary (e.g., 3a) or tertiary alkylthio group (e.g., 3b) at C(4). The carboxylate group was also retained with structural similarity, but interestingly, the carboxylic acid ester group was tethered at C(4) through the alkylthio linker. Based on the expectation that methyl ester would be one of the well-known forms as prodrug esters, and might improve the absorption and pharmacokinetic profiles,8,9 we chose methyl esters for our compounds. Taken together, 3a and 3b seemed to contain all penicillin substructures except for the bicyclic ring system. Thus, we consider that the β- lactam ring in 3 would be less-strained and less-substituted, but more unstable and reactive than the β-lactam ring in penicillin. Resultantly, we consider that 3a and 3b could be interesting analogues for the structural elucidation of monocyclic β-lactams obtained from the breakdown of penicillin.
Figure 1.Structures of monocyclic β-lactams 1 and 2.
Figure 2.Structures of monocyclic β-lactams 3a and 3b.
Synthesis of Monocyclic β-Lactams 3a and 3b. We considered several pathways to synthesize the target compounds 3a and 3b. The use of acetoxyazetidinone10 was of particular interest because we confirmed in our previous studies7 that the acetoxy group in acetoxyazetidinone can be replaced by the secondary or tertiary thiols in reasonable yields. Therefore, we devised a synthetic scheme to synthesize 3a and 3b using the corresponding thiols 6a and 6b as key intermediates, respectively, as shown in Scheme 1. In order to synthesize key thiol intermediates 6a and 6b that have a β- mercapto ester (or acid), we have considered several methods, and tested their feasibilities by carrying out the corresponding reactions. To introduce sulfur atom at the β-carbon, we attempted to induce the conjugate addition of hydrogen bromide to an α,β-unsaturated ester (or acid) to give a β- bromo ester (or acid), which then was expected to be displaced by sulfur nucleophiles to give the appropriate β- mercapto ester (or acid). However, conjugate addition and displacement did not provide satisfactory results. Next, we attempted the conjugate addition of arylthiols11 to α,β- unsaturated ester (or acid), but again results were unsatisfactory. In addition, according to the reports regarding the use of phenylthiomagnesium iodide,12 conjugate addition of acetylthiomagnesium iodide to α,β-unsaturated ester was conducted, but products were obtained at low levels only. We then considered the conjugate addition of thiolacetic acid followed by selective scission of the S-C bond to afford β- mercapto ester (or acid). Although it has been reported that thiolacetic acid adds rapidly to α,β-unsaturated ketones13 and slowly to α,β-unsaturated acids,14 we attempted this reaction using α,β-unsaturated acid for our synthesis.
Scheme 1.Synthesis of monocyclic β-lactams 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) AcSH, room temperature, 16 h, 82% (for 5a), and 25% (for 5b); (b) p-TsOH, MeOH, room temperature, 7 h; then, (c) K2CO3, room temperature, 30 min, 80% (for 6a), and 57% (for 6b) for two steps; (d) PhCH2Br, DMF, 2 h; then, Hg(OAc)2, AcOH, Ac2O, 80 °C, 2 h; then, O3, methanol–CH2Cl2, Me2S, –78 °C, 2 h, 40% (for three steps); (e) NaH, THF, room temperature, 7 h, then, 60 °C, 3 h, 31% (for 3a), and 17% (for 3b).
After examining several conditions to incorporate acetylthio group at β-position to carbonyl, we treated crotonic acid (4a) with thiolacetic acid, and obtained 3-acetylthiobutanoic acid (5a)15 in 82% yield. Subsequently, 5a was esterified using p-toluenesulfonic acid as catalyst in MeOH to give the corresponding methyl ester, which was then selectively hydrolyzed by potassium carbonate16 to afford the key intermediate, methyl 3-mercaptobutanoate (6a)17 in 80% yield. As a result, 6a was synthesized from 4a through a three-step sequence in 66% yield. In a similar manner, another key intermediate, methyl 3-mercapto-3-methylbutanoate (6b), was also synthesized from 4b, via 5b,18 through a three-step sequence in 14% yield. Notably, the yield of 6a was found to be much better than that of 6b, which suggested that in the first step, addition of thiolacetic acid to the conjugate acid 4 was greatly influenced by the presence of an additional substituent at the β-position of the conjugate acid. Thus, we considered that as 4a was a less-hindered conjugate acid for addition, it provided a higher yield than 4b.
Figure 3.Cleavage paths A and B of penicillin.
We then investigated the displacement of the acetoxy group in azetidinone with a thiol group, and as a model study, we performed the reaction using 4-acetoxyazetidin-2- one (9)7,19 which was obtained by reacting vinyl acetate and chlorosulfonyl isocyanate. Accordingly, the β-mercapto ester 6a was treated with sodium hydride and then reacted with 9 to give the corresponding 4-alkylthioazetidin-2-one in moderate yields (~50%). However, extensive efforts to improve the yield of this reaction using Lewis acids, such as, zinc chloride and borontrifluoride etherate13 were unsuccessful.
Given the results of the model study, we investigated the reaction of β-mercapto esters 6a and 6b with the acetoxyazetidinone derivative 7.7,20 Compound 7 was prepared from penicillin G through a three-step sequence in 40% yield, using the procedure described in our previous studies.7 Then, β-mercapto ester 6a or 6b was mixed with sodium hydride at room temperature for 1 h, and further treated with 7, to produce 3a or 3b, respectively. Regarding the stereochemistry of these compounds, three chiral carbons exist in 3a and two in 3b, and of these, one chiral carbon (C(3)) in both compounds has a fixed R-configuration. Thus, there could be four isomers (two cis- and two trans-isomers) for 3a and two isomers (cis- and trans-isomers) for 3b. In the case of 3a, two isomer sets (cis/trans) were isolated and identified, regardless of considerations of the chirality in the β-carbon of ester side chain. In the case of 3b, the two isomers (cis/trans) were also isolated and identified. The stereochemistries of cis-/trans-isomers were determined using the chemical shift values (δ) and coupling constants (J ) of C(3)H and C(4)H signals in 1H NMR.21,22 Accordingly, we investigated the ratios of cis-/trans-isomer formed in different reaction conditions, and the results were shown in Table 1.
Table 1.Reactions of 6 and 7 to give 3
The reactions provided compound 3a in ratios ranging from 2.5:1 to 1:1 and compound 3b in a ratio of 3:1. In general, relatively poor yields were obtained and greater difficulties were encountered in the case of tertiary mercaptan (e.g., 3b). More specifically, the ratios of cis-/trans-isomer of 3a changed from 2.5:1 (room temperature, 3 h) to 1:1 (60 °C, 3 h), and the ratio of 3b was 3:1 (60 °C, 3 h). Results obtained for 3a showed that at room temperature the cis-isomer prevails over the trans-isomer, probably due to the effect of SN2-type nucleophilic displacement.23 However, as reaction temperature increased and/or reaction time elongated, the ratio of trans-isomer increased due to its thermodynamic stability of trans-isomer. Notably, we observed the formation of trans-isomer that could be formed only via a SN1-type reaction, which derives some support from the previous studies on the involvement of intermediate, such as, the iminium ion.24 Taken together, the final yields for 3a and 3b were found to be 31% and 17% (60 °C, 3 h), respectively.
Conclusion
We report the studies on design and synthesis of the new monocyclic β-lactam esters 3a and 3b. Compounds 3a and 3b were designed by the scission of C(3)-N(4) bond of penicillin G structure, thereby aiming to retain all penicillin substructures except for the bicyclic ring system. These compounds have a phenylacetamido group as a side chain at C(3) but no substituent at N(1). Compounds 3a and 3b also have an alkylthio group at C(4) that contains a carboxylic acid ester group two carbons away from sulfur, leading to incorporation of a sec- or tert-thiol, respectively. Taken together, association of these moieties would represent the whole structure of penicillin G except bicyclic ring structure. Synthesis of 3 was achieved from the synthesis of key intermediates 6. Compounds 6a and 6b were synthesized from 4a and 4b through each three-step synthetic sequence in 66% and 14% yields, respectively. Intermediates 6a and 6b were reacted with the acetoxyazetidinone derivative 7, which was prepared by the degradation of penicillin 8, to produce 3a and 3b in moderate yields.
Experimental
General. Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained using a Perkin-Elmer 267 spectrometer and frequencies (ν) are given in reciprocal centimeters (cm-1). 1H NMR spectra were obtained using a Varian FT-80A Spectrometer and δ values for chemical shifts are expressed as units relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS). Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was conducted on glass plates (0.25 mm) coated with silica gel 60F-254 (Merck). Column chromatography was performed using Merck silica gels (0.040.0.063 mm). Most chemicals were purchased commercially and, when needed, were distilled before use. Some compounds were prepared by known procedures and identified by comparing spectral and physical data with reported values.
3(R/S)-Acetylthiobutanoic Acid (5a)15 and 3-Acetylthio- 3-methylbutanoic Acid (5b).18 A solution of crotonic acid (4a, 3.2 g, 37 mmol) and thiolacetic acid (5.3 mL, 74 mmol) was maintained at room temperature for 16 h. Excess thiolacetic acid was removed in vacuo. The remained residue was treated with H2O (50 mL) and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give an oily residue. Purification of the residue by column chromatography afforded the title compound (5a, 4.9 g, 82%) as a yellow solid. Similarly, the use of 3-methylcrotonic acid (4b, 3.7 g, 37 mmol) as a starting material afforded the title compound (5b, 1.6 g, 25%) as a yellow solid. For 5a: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 80 MHz ) δ 10.0 (br s, 1H), 3.90–3.70 (m, 1H), 2.75–2.56 (m, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 1.40 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); IR (CHCl3) ν 3150, 1720, 1700 cm−1.
Methyl 3(R/S)-Mercaptobutanoate (6a)17 and Methyl 3- Mercapto-3-methylbutanoate (6b). To a stirred solution of 3-acetylthiobutanoic acid (5a, 2.1 g, 13 mmol) in methanol (40 mL) was added p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (0.19 g, 1.0 mmol) at room temperature. After stirring for 7 h, K2CO3 (7.2 g, 52 mmol) was added in small portions at room temperature and stirring was continued for 30 min. Then, solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue so obtained was poured onto 50 mL of H2O, which was adjusted to pH 3.0 with aqueous 1.0 N HCl. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 40 mL) and the organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give an oily residue. Purification of the residue by Kugel Rohr vacuum distillation (mp 58–63 °C/30 mmHg) afforded the title compound (6a, 1.4 g, 80%) as a sticky solid. Similarly, the use of 3-acetylthio-3-methylbutanoic acid (5b, 2.3 g, 13 mmol) as a starting material afforded the title compound (6b, 1.1 g, 57%) as a sticky solid. For 6a: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 80 MHz) δ 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.63–3.10 (m, 1H), 2.55 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.77 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.41 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); IR (KBr) ν 1750 cm−1.
4(R/S)-(1'-Methoxycarbonylpropyl-2'(R/S)-thio)-3(R)- phenylacetamidoazetidin-2-one (cis/trans-3a). To a stirred solution of NaH (41 mg, 1.7 mmol) in THF (5 mL) at room temperature was added a solution of methyl 3-mercaptobutanoate (6a, 228 mg, 1.7 mmol) in THF (1.5 mL). After stirring for 1h at room temperature, a solution of the azetidinone derivative (7, 370 mg, 1.4 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added to the mixture, which was then stirred for additional 3 h at 60 °C. After cooling, the reaction mixture was treated with H2O (30 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 30 mL), and the organic layers were washed with 5% brine (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give an oily residue. Purification of the residue by column chromatography afforded the title compound (3a, 146 mg, 31%, cis-/trans-isomer = 1/1). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 80 MHz), for cis-3a: δ 7.20 (s, 5H), 7.05 (br s, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92–4.70 (m, 1H), 4.50 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.50 (s, 2H), 3.45–3.05 (m, 1H), 2.51 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); for trans-3a: δ 7.26 (s, 5H), 7.00 (br s, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 7.0 Hz. 1H), 5.49 (dd, J = 9.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.60 (s, 2H), 3.30– 3.10 (m, 1H), 2.55–2.33 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.20 (m, 3H); IR (KBr) ν 3400, 1780, 1745, 1685 cm−1.
4(R/S)-(1'-Methoxycarbonyl-2'-methylpropyl-2'-thio)- 3(R)-phenylacetamidoazetidin-2-one (cis/trans-3b). To a stirred solution of NaH (7.5 mg, 0.31 mmol) in THF (2 mL) at room temperature was added a solution of methyl 3- mercapto-3-methylbutanoate (6b, 46 mg, 0.31 mmol) in THF (0.8 mL). After stirring for 1 h at room temperature, a solution of azetidinone derivative (7, 63 mg, 0.24 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added to the mixture, and stirred for 3 h at 60 °C. After cooling, the reaction mixture was treated with H2O (20 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 20 mL), and the organic layers were washed with 5% brine (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give an oily residue. Purification of the residue by column chromatography afforded the title compound (3b, 14 mg, 17%, cis-/trans-isomer = 3/ 1). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 80 MHz), for cis-3b: δ 7.21 (s, 5H), 6.51 (br s, 1H), 6.18 (br s, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.56 (s, 2H), 2.50 (s, 2H), 1.38 (s, 6H); for trans-3b: δ 7.25 (s, 5H), 6.30−5.89 (br s, 2H), 5.50 (dd, J = 8.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.56 (s, 2H), 2.48 (s, 2H), 1.38 (s, 6H); IR (KBr) ν 3400, 1780, 1745, 1690 cm-1.
4(S)-Acetoxy-3(S)-phenylacetamidoazetidin-2-one (trans- 7).7,20 The synthesis of 7 was achieved through a three-step sequence, as previously described.7 First, the potassium salt of penicillin G (8, 1.8 g, 4.8 mmol) in DMF (16 mL) was reacted with benzyl bromide (0.64 mL, 5.4 mmol) for 2 h at room temperature to afford the benzyl ester of penicillin G (1.7 g). Second, this ester was added in small portions to a preheated solution (80–85 °C) of mercuric acetate (1.9 mg, 6.0 mmol), acetic acid (8.5 mL), and acetic anhydride (0.85 mL), and stirring was continued for 2 h at 80–85 °C to give trans-(4S)-acetoxy-1-(benzyloxycarbonyl-2-methylpropenyl)-( 3S)-phenylacetamidoazetidin-2-one (1.1 g). Third, this compound was allowed to undergo ozonolysis by bubbling ozone in a mixture of methanol-CH2Cl2 (1:1, 22 mL) for 2 h at –78 °C to provide the title compound (7, 0.50 g, 40% for three steps). The spectral data of 7 were in good agreement with the reported results.7
4-Acetoxyazetidin-2-one (9).7,19 As previously described,7 chlorosulfonyl isocyanate (1.0 mL, 11 mmol) was reacted with vinyl acetate (5.0 mL, 54 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 for 2 h at 0 °C, leading to the generation of the title compound (9, 0.50 g, 35%). The spectral data of 9 were in good agreement with the reported results.7
References
- Howarth, T. T.; Brown, A. G.; King, T. T. Chem. Commun. 1976, 266.
- Imada, A.; Kitano, K.; Kintaka, K.; Muroi, M.; Asai, M. Nature 1981, 289, 590. https://doi.org/10.1038/289590a0
- Sykes, R. B.; Cimarusti, C. M.; Bonner, D. P.; Bush, K.; Floyd, D. M.; Koster, W. H. Nature 1981, 291, 489. https://doi.org/10.1038/291489a0
- Burnett, D. A. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1873. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867043364865
- Sperka, T.; Pitlik, J.; Bagossi, P.; Tozser, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 15, 3086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.04.020
- Galletti, P.; Giacomini, D. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 4265. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711797200480
- Lee, S. H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 121. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.1.121
- Fan, H.-J.; Paternotte, I.; Vermander, M.; Li, K.; Beaujean, M.; Scorneaux, B.; Dumont, P.; Osinski, P.; Claesen, M.; Tulkens, P. M.; Sonveaux, E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 3107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(97)10146-9
- Nobuharu, K.; Ken-Ichi, N.; Akihisa, Y.; Syohei, N.; Susumu, N.; Satoshi, T.; Hiroshi, M.; Toshiyuki, K.; Masayasu, K.; Kazuhiko, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1984, 32, 692. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.32.692
- Meiries, S.; Marquez, R. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5015. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo800574g
- Khatik, G. L.; Kumar, R.; Chakraborti, A. K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2433. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol060846t
- Shono, T.; Mataumura, Y.; Kashimura, S.; Hatanaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4752. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00510a064
- Greene A. E.; Padilla, A.; Crabbe, P. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 4377. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00416a031
- Walton, E.; Wagner, A. F.; Bachelor, F. W.; Peterson, L. H.; Holly, F. W.; Folkers, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5144. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01624a057
- Yuan, M.; Zhitomirsky, D.; Adinolfi, V.; Voznyy, O.; Kemp, K. W.; Ning, Z.; Lan, X.; Xu, J.; Kim, J. Y.; Dong, H.; Sargent, E. H. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5586. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma201302802
- Kim, H. R.; Kim, J. J.; Park, J. J.; Lee, S. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 5720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2012.08.015
- Kumar, I.; Jolly, R. S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 283. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol0069195
- Okuno, H.; Uoto, K.; Tomohiro, T.; Youinou, M. T. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.: Inorg. Chem. 1990, 11, 3375.
- Firestone, R. A.; Barker, P. A.; Pisano, J. M.; Ashe, B. M.; Dahlgren, M. E. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)82006-8
- Brain, E. G.; Eglington, A. J.; Nayler, J. H. C.; Pearson, M. J.; Southgate, R. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 1976, 447.
- Ceric, H.; Kovacevic, M.; Sindler-Kulyk, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3985. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00298-2
- Corbett, D. F.; Kaura, A. C.; Maycock, C. D.; Stoodley, R. J. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 1987, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1039/p19870002009
- Kostova, M. B.; Myers, C. J.; Beck, T. N.; Plotkin, B. J.; Green, J. M.; Boshoff, H. I.; Barry, C. E., III.; Deschamps, J. R.; Konaklieva, M. I. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 6842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.09.030
- Fujimoto, K.; Iwano, Y.; Hirai, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)98475-2
Cited by
- Copper(I)-catalyzed radical carboamination reaction of 8-aminoquinoline-oriented buteneamides with chloroform: synthesis of-β-lactams vol.11, pp.45, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra05233k