DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

논제 구축형 독서토론수업 모형 개발과 효과성에 관한 연구

A Study on Development of an Instructional Model for Expanding Reading Debate Topics and Effects on the Model

  • 투고 : 2014.07.17
  • 심사 : 2014.08.19
  • 발행 : 2014.08.30

초록

본 연구는 설계기반연구를 활용하여 논제 구축형 독서토론수업 모형을 개발하고 그 효과성을 연구하기 위하여 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 경기도에 위치한 초등학교 4학년 학생을 대상으로 논제 구축형 독서토론수업 모형을 적용하여 수업을 진행하고, 사전검사와 사후검사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 논제 구축형 독서토론수업 모형은 학생들의 독서태도와 자기주도적 학습태도의 향상에 효과적인 것으로 나타났다.

This study is to develop an instructional model for expanding reading debate topic. Also, effects on reading attitude and self-directed learning are identified in this study. The instructional model is implemented for target students, elementary school students. This model was evaluated by a pre-test and a post-test, targeting on students in fourth grade. As a result, this model is effective on developing reading habits and establishing self-directed attitude.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김선영. 2013. 전문성 수준에 적응적인 학습활동 중심 이러닝 설계전략 개발. 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원.(Kim, Sun-Young. 2013. Development of e-learning design strategies based on learning activity adapting to expertise level. Ph.D. diss., Seoul Nation University.)
  2. 김승환. 2004. 독서토론의 활성화를 위한 독서자료 활용에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 36(3): 1-22.(Kim, Seung-Hoan. 2004. "A Study of the Reading Material Use on the Reading Discussion." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(3): 1-22.)
  3. 김영희. 2005. 책읽기를 좋아하는 아이로 키우는 부모의 지혜. 서울: 아침나라. (Kim, Young-Hee. 2005. The Parents' whisdom of How to Bringin up Children to Like Books. Seoul: AchimNara.)
  4. 노명완, 김라연. 2008. 웹 게시판을 이용한 독서 토론에서의 학습자 반응 양상 분석. 독서연구, 20: 171-199. (Noh, Myeong-Wan and Kim, Ra-Yeon. 2008. "A study on Analysis of Leaner Responses in Web board-based Reading Discussions." Journal of reading research, 20: 171-199.)
  5. 박형근. 2010. 동기요인과 자기주도학습의 관계에서 학습몰입의 매개효과 분석. 박사학위논문, 홍익대학교 대학원. (Park, Hyeong-Geun. 2010. (An) Analysis of the Mediating Effect of the Learning Flow in the Relationship between Study Motivation Factors and Self-Directed Learning. Ph.D. diss., Hong-Ik University.)
  6. 변우열. 2009. 독서교육의 이해. 서울: 조은글터.(Byun, Woo-Yeoul. 2009. Understandig of Reading Education. Seoul: JoeunGeulter.)
  7. 서울대학교 교육연구소. 1994. 교육학 용어 사전. 서울: 하우. (Education Research institute Seoul Nation University. 1994. Terminology Dictionary of Education. Seoul: How.)
  8. 서정혁. 2009. '찬반 대립형 독서토론' 모형 연구: 교보.숙명 전국독서토론대회 모형을 중심으로. 독서교육, 21: 257-284. (Seo, Jeong-Hyok. 2009. "A Case Study on a Pro-Con Book Debate Model - Focusing on the Kyobo-Sookmyung Book Debate Model." Journal of reading research, 21: 257-284.)
  9. 안인자, 윤석윤. 2013. 독서토론 프로그램 효과성 요인에 관한 연구: 인천광역시 지역아동센터 프로그램을 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(1): 377-398. (Ahn, In-Ja and Youn, Youn-Seak. 2013. "The Study on Effective Factors of Reading Discussion for the Young Adults Program of A Local Children Care Center in Incheon." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1): 377-398.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.1.377
  10. 양재한, 김수경, 김석임. 2003. 어린이 독서지도론. 대구: 태일사. (Yangm Jae-Han, Kim, Soo-Kyoung and Kim, Suk-Im. 2003. How to Teach Reading for Children. Daegu: Taeilsa.)
  11. 양명희. 2000. 자기조절학습의 모형 탐색과 타당화 연구. 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원. (Yang, Myong-Hee. 2000. The Study on the development and validation of self-regulated learning model. Ph.D. diss., Seoul Nation University.)
  12. 이형래. 2009. 교실 독서토론 모형에 관한 연구. 한국초등국어교육, 39: 451-492. (Lee, Hyeong-Rae. 2009. "A Study on the Classroom Reading discussion Model." Journal of Elementary Korean Education, 39: 451-492.)
  13. 이황직. 2007. 개방형 논제 제시 독서토론 모형 연구: 교보.숙명 독서토론 방식을 중심으로. 독서연구, 17: 309-330. (Yi, Hwang-Jik. 2007. "A Case Report on the Kyobo-Sookmyung Book Discussion Model." Journal of reading research, 17: 309-330.)
  14. 정종기. 2005. 면대면 독서토론과 웹기반 독서토론의 효과 비교. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 35(3): 291-312. (Jung, Jong-Kee. 2005. "Comparison on Effects of Face - to - face Reading Discussion and Web - based's." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(3): 291-312.)
  15. 한국어문교육연구소. 2006. 독서 교육 사전. 서울: 교학사. (Korea Language Educational Research Institute. 2006. Dictionary of Reading Education. Seoul: Kyohak.)
  16. 호양선. 2012. 영재학생과 일반학생의 독서태도와 초인지적 읽기전략에 대한 연구. 석사학위논문, 인천대학교 교육대학원. (Ho, Yang-Sun. 2012. Reading Attitude and Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies of Gifted and Average Students. M.A. thesis, Gradute School of Education University Tncheon.)
  17. Alexander, J. E. and Filler, R. C. 1976. Attitudes and reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  18. Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M. and Linn, M. C. 2004. "Design-based research in education." In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell(Eds.), Internet Environments for Science Education: 73-85. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  19. Burns, B. 1998. "Changing the classroom climate with literature circle." Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(2): 124-129.
  20. Daniel, H. 1994. Literature Circle: Voice and Choice in the Student-Centered Classroom. York, ME: Stenhouse.
  21. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  22. Gambrell, L. B. and Mazzoni, S. A. 1999. "Principles of best practice: Finding the common ground." In L. B. Gambrell. L. M. Morrow. S. B. Neuman. & M. Pressley (Eds.). Best practice in literacy instruction, 11-21. NY: Guilford.
  23. Guglielmino, L. M. 1997. Development of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale. Ph.D. diss. the University of Georgia.
  24. Jang, S. 2011. An Instructional Support System Design Model for Ill-structured Problem-Solving in Online Learning. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  25. King, C. 2001. "I like group reading because we can share ideas: the role of talk within the Literature Circle." Reading, 35(1): 26-32.
  26. Knowles, M. 1975. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learner and Teachers. Chicago. IL: Follett Publishing Co.
  27. Long, H. B. 1988. Foreword to the New Edition. in the 1998 edition of Cyril O. Houle's. The inquiring mind. Norman. OK: Oklahoma Research Center for continuing Professional and Higher Education.
  28. Long, T. W. and Gove. M. K. 2003. "How engagement strategies and literature circles promote critical response in a fourth-grade, urban classroom." The Reading Teacher, 57(4): 350-361.
  29. Mathewson, G. C. 1994. Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell. & H. Singer (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed, pp.1131-1161). Newark. DE: International Reading Association.
  30. Mckenna, M. C. 1994. Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition. In E. H. Cramer & M. Castle (Eds., pp. 18-40). Fostering the love of reading, DE: International Reading Association.
  31. Sandoval, W. A. 2004. "Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs." Educational Psychologist, 39(4): 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_3
  32. Smith, M. C. 1990. "A Longitudinal Investigation of Reading Attitude Development from Childhood to Adulthood." The Journal of Educational Research, 83(4): 215-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885958
  33. Tierney, R. J., Readence, J. E. and Dishner, E. K. 1995. Reading Strategies and Practice, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  34. Voight, C. and Swatman, P. 2005. Interaction in Case Discussion: A design-based research approach. Available: http://www.insyl.unisa.edu.au/publications/working-papers/2005-21.pdf
  35. Zimmerman, B. J. 1990. "Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Overview." Educational Psychologist, 25(1): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2