Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제7권3호
  • /
  • Pages.365-384
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between parameters of pulse-type motions and damage of low-rise RC frames

  • Cao, Vui Van (School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland) ;
  • Ronagh, Hamid Reza (School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.03
  • 심사 : 2014.05.20
  • 발행 : 2014.09.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The intensity of a ground motion can be measured by a number of parameters, some of which might exhibit robust correlations with the damage of structures subjected to that motion. In this study, 204 near-fault pulse-type records are selected and their seismic parameters are determined. Time history and damage analyses of a tested 3-storey reinforced concrete frame representing for low-rise reinforced concrete buildings subjected to those earthquake motions are performed after calibration and comparison with the available experimental results. The aim of this paper is to determine amongst several available seismic parameters, the ones that have strong correlations with the structural damage measured by a damage index and the maximum inter-story drift. The results show that Velocity Spectrum Intensity is the leading parameter demonstrating the best correlation, followed by Housner Intensity, Spectral Acceleration and Spectral Displacement. These seismic parameters are recommended as reliable parameters of near-fault pulse-type motions related to damage potential of low-rise reinforced concrete structures. The results also reaffirm that the conventional and widely used parameter of Peak Ground Acceleration does not exhibit a good correlation with the structural damage.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI (2008), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-08) and Commentary.
  2. Alvanitopoulos, P.F., Andreadis, I. and Elenas, A. (2010), "Interdependence between damage indices and ground motion parameters based on Hilbert-Huang transform", Meas. Sci. Tech., 21. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/21/2/025101.
  3. Arias, A. (1970), "A measure of earthquake intensity", Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 438-483.
  4. Baker, J.W. (2007), "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5), 1486-1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255
  5. Banon, H., Biggs, J.M. and Irvine, H.M., (1981), "Seismic damage in reinforced concrete members", J. Struct. Eng., 107(9), 1713-1729.
  6. Banon, H. and Veneziano, D., (1982), "Seismic safety of reinforced members and structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100202
  7. Bassam, A., Iranmanesh, A. and Ansari, F. (2011), "A simple quantitative approach for post earthquake damage assessment of flexure dominant reinforced concrete bridges", Eng. Struct., 33, 3218-3225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.06.024
  8. Benjamin, J.R. and Associates (1988), "A criterion for determining exceedence of the operating basis earthquake EPRI Report NP-5930", Palo Alto, California: Electric Power Research Institute.
  9. Bertero, V.V., Mahin, S.A. and Herrera, R.A. (1978), "Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 6(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105
  10. Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V.V., (2001), "Evaluation of damage potential of recorded earthquake ground motion", Seismol. Res. Lett., 72(2), 233.
  11. Bracci, J.M. (1992), "Experimental and analytical study of seismic damage and retrofit of lightly reinforced concrete structures in low seismicity zones", State University of New York at Buffalo.
  12. Bracci, J.M., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995), "Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings designed for gravity loads: performance of structural system", ACI Struct. J., 92(5).
  13. Cao, V.V., Ronagh, H., Ashraf, M. and Baji H. (2014), "A new damage index for reinforced concrete structures", Earthq. Struct., 6(6), 581-609. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.6.581
  14. Choi, H., Saiidi, M.S., Somerville, P. and El-Azazy, S. (2010), "Experimental study of reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to near-fault ground motions", ACI Struct. J., 107(1), 3.
  15. Colombo, A. and Negro, P. (2005), "A damage index of generalised applicability", Eng. Struct., 27(8), 1164-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.014
  16. Computers and Structures Inc, (2009), "SAP2000 Version 14.1.0".
  17. DiPasquale, E., Ju, J.W., Askar, A. and Cakmak, A. (1990), "Relation between global damage indices and local stiffness degradation", J. Struct. Eng., 116(5), 1440-1456. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1440)
  18. Dobry, R., Idriss, I.M. and Ng, E. (1978), "Duration characteristics of horizontal components of strongmotion earthquake records", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 68(5), 1487-1520.
  19. Eleftheriadou, A.K. and Karabinis, A.I. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings based on damage data after a near field earthquake (7 September 1999 Athens - Greece)", Earthq. Struct., 3(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.2.117
  20. Elenas, A. (1997), "Interdependency between seismic acceleration parameters and the behaviour of structures", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 16(5), 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00005-5
  21. Elenas, A. (2000), "Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 20, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00041-5
  22. Elenas, A. and Liolios, A. (1995), "Earthquake induced nonlinear behavior of reinforced concrete frame structures in relation with characteristic acceleration parameters", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice 1995, 1013-1020.
  23. Elenas, A., Liolios, A. and Vasiliadis, L. (1995), "Earthquake induced nonlinear behavior of structures in relation with characteristic acceleration parameters", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna 1994, 1011-1016.
  24. Elenas, A., Liolios, A. and Vasiliadis, L. (1999), "Correlation factors between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indicators of reinforced concrete structures", Structural dynamics - EURODYN'99, 2.
  25. Elenas, A. and Meskouris, K. (2001), "Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures", Eng. Struct., 23, 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  26. Elnashai, A. and Sarno, L.D. (2008), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  27. EPRI (1988), A criterion for determining exceedance of the operating basis earthquake Report No. EPRI NP-5930, Palo Alto, California Electrical Power Research Institute.
  28. Fajfar, P. (1992), "Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21, 837-848. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290211001
  29. Fardis, M.N., Economu, S.N. and Antoniou, A.N. (1993), Damage Measures and Failure Criteria - Part I, Contribution of University of Patras Final Report of Cooperative research on the seismic response of reinforced concrete structures - 2nd Phase.
  30. Galal, K. and Ghobarah, A. (2006), "Effect of near-fault earthquakes on North American nuclear design spectra", Nuclear Eng. Des., 236, 1928-1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.02.002
  31. Galal, K. and Naimi, M. (2008), "Effect of soil conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near fault earthquakes", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 17, 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.365
  32. Ghobarah, A., Abou-Elfath, H. and Biddah, A. (1999), "Response-based damage assessment of structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<79::AID-EQE805>3.0.CO;2-J
  33. Ghobarah, A. and Aly, N.M. (1998), "Seismic reliability assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 2(4), 569-592.
  34. Ghosh, S., Datta, D. and Katakdhond, A.A. (2011), "Estimation of the Park-Ang damage index for planar multi-storey frames using equivalent single-degree systems", Eng. Struct., 33, 2509-2524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.023
  35. Gibbons, J.D. and Chakraborti, S. (2003), Nonparametric Statistical Inference: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  36. Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. (2010), "Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple near-fault earthquakes", Comput. Struct., 88, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.006
  37. Housner, G. (1952), "Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes", Proceeding of the Symposium on earthquake and blast effects on structures in Los Angeles, California, 20-36.
  38. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), "Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings", Earthq. Spect., 22(2), 367-390. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192560
  39. Kim, T.H., Lee, K.M., Chung, Y.S. and Shin, H.M. (2005), "Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns", Eng. Struct., 27, 576-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.016
  40. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, New Jersy: Prentice Hall.
  41. Krishnan, S. (2007), "Case studies of damage to 19-storey irregular steel moment-frame buildings under near-source ground motion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36, 861-885. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.657
  42. Kunnath, S.K., Reinhorn, A.M. and Lobo, R.F. (1992), IDARC Version 3.0: A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Report No. NCEER-92-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo.
  43. Lu, L.Y. and Lin, G.L. (2009), "Improvement of near-fault seismic isolation using a resettable variable stiffness damper", Eng. Struct., 31, 2097-2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.011
  44. Mavroeidis, G. and Papageorgiou, A., (2003), "A mathematical representation of near- fault ground motions", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(3), 1099-1131. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020100
  45. Mergos, P.E. and Kappos, A.J. (2009), "Seismic damage analysis including inelastic shear-flexure interaction", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8, 27-46.
  46. Mollaioli, F., Bruno, S., Decanini, L.D. and Panza, G.F. (2006), "Characterization of the dynamic response of structures to damaging pulse-type near-fault ground motions", Meccanica, 41, 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-005-7965-y
  47. Moustafa, A. and Takewaki, I. (2012), "Characterization of earthquake ground motion of multiple sequences", Earthq. Struct., 3(5), 629-647. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.5.629
  48. Nanos, N., Elenas, A. and Ponterosso, P. (2008), "Correlation of different strong motion duration parameters and damage indicators of reinforced concrete structures", The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  49. Nuttli, O.W. (1979), The Relation of Sustained Maximum Ground Acceleration and Velocity to Earthquake Intensity and Magnitude Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, Report 16 (pp. 74): U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg, Mississippi.
  50. Ozmen, H.B., Inel, M. and Cayci, B.T. (2013), "Engineering implications of the RC building damages after 2011 Van Earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., 5(3), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.297
  51. Park, S.W., Ghasemi, H., Shen, J., Somerville, P.G., Yen, P. and Yashinsky, M. (2004), "Simulation of the seismic performance of the Bolu Viaduct subjected to near-fault ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 1249-1270. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.395
  52. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  53. PEER (2011), PEER ground motion database. http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database.
  54. Powell, G.H. and Allahabadi, R. (1988), "Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: Concepts and procedures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 16, 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160507
  55. Rathje, E.M., Abrahamson, N.A. and Bray, J.D. (1998), "Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150)
  56. Rodriguez, M.E. and Padilla, D. (2009), "A damage index for the seismic analysis of reinforced concrete members", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(3), 364-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802597893
  57. Roufaiel, M.S.L. and Meyer, C. (1981), Analysis of Damaged Concrete Frame Buildings, Technical Report No. NSF-CEE-81-21359-1, Columbia University, New York.
  58. Roufaiel, M.S.L. and Meyer, C. (1987), "Analytical modeling of hysteretic behavior of R/C frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 113(3), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:3(429)
  59. Sarma, S.K. and Yang, K.S. (1987), "An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95". Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 15(1), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150109
  60. Seismo Signal (Version 4.1.2). (2010), Pavia, Italy: Seismosoft Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.seismosoft.com/en/HomePage.aspx.
  61. Sheikh, S.A. and Khoury, S.S. (1993), "Confined concrete columns with stubs", ACI Struct. J., 90(4), 414-431.
  62. Spiegel, M.R. (1990), Theory and problems of statistics. London: McGraw-Hill.
  63. Tabeshpour, M.R., Bakhshi, A. and Golafshani, A.A. (2004), "Vulnerability and damage analyses of existing buildings", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1261.
  64. Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A. and Nielsen, N.N. (1970), "Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes", J. Struct. Div., 96, 2557-2573.
  65. Thun, J.L.V., Roehm, L.H., Scott, G.A. and Wilson, J.A. (1988), "Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams", Geotechnical special publication: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II- Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation, 20, 463-481.
  66. Yon, B., Sayin, E. and Koksal, T.S. (2013), "Seismic response of buildings during the May 19, 2011 Simav, Turkey earthquake", Earthq. Struct., 5(3), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.343
  67. Yuksel, E. and Surmeli, M. (2010), "Failure analysis of one-story precast structures for near-fault and farfault strong ground motions", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8, 937-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9164-z

피인용 문헌

  1. Damage potential of earthquake records for RC building stock vol.10, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1315
  2. Seismic risk assessment of deficient reinforced concrete frames in near-fault regions vol.2, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2014.2.4.261
  3. An Approach to Develop Compound Intensity Measures for Prediction of Damage Potential of Earthquake Records Using Canonical Correlation Analysis pp.1559-808X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1481157
  4. Performance of RC moment frames with fixed and hinged supports under near-fault ground motions vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.1.089
  5. Novel Hilbert spectrum-based seismic intensity parameters interrelated with structural damage vol.16, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.2.197
  6. Identifying significant earthquake intensity measures for evaluating seismic damage and fragility of nuclear power plant structures vol.52, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.06.013
  7. Seismic damage potential described by intensity parameters based on Hilbert-Huang Transform analysis and fundamental frequency of structures vol.18, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.4.507
  8. Identifying Optimal Intensity Measures for Predicting Damage Potential of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences vol.10, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196795
  9. Correlation between Ground Motion Parameters and Displacement Demands of Mid-Rise RC Buildings on Soft Soils Considering Soil-Structure-Interaction vol.11, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030125
  10. External GFRP confinement to decrease near-fault earthquake damage of reinforced concrete structures considering soil-structure interaction vol.34, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.027