Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Life-cycle cost optimization of steel moment-frame structures: performance-based seismic design approach

  • Kaveh, A. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kalateh-Ahani, M. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Fahimi-Farzam, M. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2013.11.13
  • Accepted : 2014.05.01
  • Published : 2014.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In recent years, along with the advances made in performance-based design optimization, the need for fast calculation of response parameters in dynamic analysis procedures has become an important issue. The main problem in this field is the extremely high computational demand of time-history analyses which may convert the solution algorithm to illogical ones. Two simplifying strategies have shown to be very effective in tackling this problem; first, simplified nonlinear modeling investigating minimum level of structural modeling sophistication, second, wavelet analysis of earthquake records decreasing the number of acceleration points involved in time-history loading. In this paper, we try to develop an efficient framework, using both strategies, to solve the performance-based multi-objective optimal design problem considering the initial cost and the seismic damage cost of steel moment-frame structures. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is employed as the optimization algorithm to search the Pareto optimal solutions. The constraints of the optimization problem are considered in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recommended design specifications. The results from numerical application of the proposed framework demonstrate the capabilities of the framework in solving the present multi-objective optimization problem.

Keywords

References

  1. Alimoradi, A., Pezeshk, S. and Foley, C.M. (2007), "Probabilistic performance-based optimal design of steel moment-resisting frames I: applications", J. Struct. Eng., 133(6), 757-766. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(757)
  2. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2010), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-10), Chicago.
  3. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC-LRFD) (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10), Chicago.
  4. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE-7) (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10), Virginia.
  5. Coello, C.A.C., Pulido, G.T. and Lechuga, M.S. (2004), "Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 8(3), 256-279. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067
  6. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002), "A fast and elitist multi objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  7. Deb, K. (2009), Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Wiley, New York.
  8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, Repo FEMA 273, Washington, DC.
  9. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2000), Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Rep. FEMA 350, Washington, DC.
  10. Foley, C.M. (2002), "Optimized performance-based design for buildings", Recent Advances in Optimal Structural Design (Chapter 8), Burns SA (ed.), ASCE, Washington, DC.
  11. Foley, C.M., Pezeshk, S. and Alimoradi, A. (2007), "Probabilistic performance-based optimal design of steel moment-resisting frames II: frmulations", J. Struct. Eng., 133(6), 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(767)
  12. Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2006), "Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 32(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0009-y
  13. Ganzerli, S., Pantelides, C.P. and Reaveley, L.D. (2000), "Performance-based design using structural optimization", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(11), 1677-1690. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200011)29:11<1677::AID-EQE986>3.0.CO;2-N
  14. Gholizadeh, S. and Samavati, O.A. (2011), "Structural optimization by wavelet transforms and neural networks", Appl. Math. Model, 35(2), 915-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.046
  15. Ibarra, L.F. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), Global Collapse of Frame Structures under Seismic Excitations, Rep. No. TB 152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
  16. Karami Mohammadi, R. and Sharghi, A.H. (2014), "On the optimum performance-based design of eccentrically braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., An Int. J., 16 (4), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.4.357
  17. Kaveh, A., Fahimi-Farzam, M. and Kalateh-Ahani, M. (2012), "Time-history analysis based optimal design of space trusses: The CMA evolution strategy approach using GRNN and WA", Struct. Eng. Mech., 44(3), 379-403. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.3.379
  18. Kaveh, A., Laknejadi, K. and Alinejad, B. (2011), "Performance-based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures", Acta Mech., 223(2), 355-369.
  19. Lignos, D. Putman, CH. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Seismic assessment of steel moment frames using simplified nonlinear models", 3rd ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2011), Corfu, Greece, 25-28 May.
  20. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration modeling of steel beams and columns in support to collapse prediction of steel moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 137 (11), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376
  21. Liu, M., Burns, S.A. and Wen, Y.K. (2003), "Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(9), 1313-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.273
  22. Liu, M. Burns, S.A. and Wen, Y.K. (2005), "Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(3), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.426
  23. MATLAB (2011), The Language of Technical Computing, Math Works Inc., .
  24. Nakashima, M. Ogawa, K. and Inoue, K. (2001), "Generic frame model for simulation of earthquake responses of steel moment frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 31(3), 671-692.
  25. OpenSees (2013), Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif., .
  26. Papadrakakis, M. and Lagaros, N.D (2003), "Soft computing methodologies for structural optimization", Appl. Soft Comput., 3(3), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1568-4946(03)00040-1
  27. PEER (2010), Strong motion database Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database.
  28. Salajegheh, E. and Heidari, A. (2005), "Time history dynamic analysis of structures using filter banks and wavelet transforms", Comput. Struct., 83(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.008
  29. SeismoArtif (2012), Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions, SeismoSoft Inc., .
  30. SeismoSignal (2012). Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions, SeismoSoft Inc., .
  31. Strang, G. and Nguyen, T. (1996), Wavelets and filter banks, Cambridge Press, Wellesle.
  32. Towhata, I. (2008), Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin.
  33. Talbi, E.G. (2009), Metaheuristics: from design to implementation, Wiley, New Jersey.
  34. Wen, Y.K. and Kang, Y.J. (2001), "Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria", J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(338)

Cited by

  1. Seismic design optimization of multi–storey steel–concrete composite buildings vol.170, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.010
  2. Seismic Optimum Design of Steel Structures Using Gradient-Based and Genetic Algorithm Methods vol.15, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0088-0
  3. Multi-hazard loss analysis of tall buildings under wind and seismic loads vol.14, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1442482
  4. Assessing the Influence of Mining Impacts on Buildings using SVM and MLR Method vol.471, pp.1757-899X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/5/052060
  5. A retrofitting method for torsionally sensitive buildings using evolutionary algorithms vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.3.309
  6. Cost-Based Design of Nonstructural Elements for Tall Buildings under Extreme Wind Environments vol.32, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001008
  7. A risk-based framework for design of concrete structures against earthquake vol.25, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.25.2.167
  8. Optimum design of stiffened plates for static or dynamic loadings using different ribs vol.74, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.2.255
  9. Single and multi-objective optimization of steel moment-resisting frame buildings under vehicle impact using evolutionary algorithms vol.6, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-021-00117-2
  10. Multi-objective optimal design of steel MRF buildings based on life-cycle cost using a swift algorithm vol.34, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.088
  11. Effects of demand parameters in the performance-based multi-objective optimum design of steel moment frame buildings vol.153, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107075