Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제7권3호
  • /
  • Pages.251-269
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental and numerical studies on seismic performance of hollow RC bridge columns

  • Han, Qiang (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Zhou, Yulong (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Du, Xiuli (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Huang, Chao (MCEER, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York) ;
  • Lee, George C. (MCEER, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York)
  • 투고 : 2014.12.06
  • 심사 : 2014.04.23
  • 발행 : 2014.09.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

To investigate the seismic performance and to obtain quantitative parameters for the requirement of performance-based bridge seismic design approach, 12 reinforced concrete (RC) hollow rectangular bridge column specimens were tested under constant axial load and cyclic bending. Parametric study is carried out on axial load ratio, aspect ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio and transverse reinforcement ratio. The damage states of these column specimens were related to engineering limit states to determine the quantitative criteria of performance-based bridge seismic design. The hysteretic behavior of bridge column specimens was simulated based on the fiber model in OpenSees program and the results of the force-displacement hysteretic curves were well agreed with the experimental results. The damage states of residual cracking, cover spalling, and core crushing could be well related to engineering limit states, such as longitudinal tensile strains of reinforcement or compressive strains of concrete, etc. using cumulative probability curves. The ductility coefficient varying from 3.71 to 8.29, and the equivalent viscous damping ratio varying from 0.19 to 0.31 could meet the requirements of seismic design.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AASHTO (2007), LRFD bridge design specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington (DC), USA.
  2. ACI (2008), ACI 318-08 Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, ACI Committee Institute, Farmington Hills, USA.
  3. ATC (1996), ATC-32 Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges: provisional recommendations, Applied Technology Council, California, USA.
  4. Berry, M.P (2007), "Performance modeling strategies for modern reinforced concrete bridge columns", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, USA.
  5. Brown, J. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000), Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Longitudinal Reinforcement in Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns, NCEER Technical Report 00-0007.
  6. CALTRANS (2006), Bridge design specifications, Sacramento California Department of Transportation, California, USA.
  7. Calvi, G.M., Pavese, A., Rasulo, A. and Bolognini, D. (2005), "Experimental and numerical studies on the seismic response of RC hollow bridge piers", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 3(3), 267-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-005-2240-0
  8. Chang, G. and Mander, J. (1994), Seismic Energy Based Fatigue Damage Analysis of Bridge Columns: Part I-Evaluation of Seismic Capacity, NCEER Technical Report 94-0006.
  9. Cheng, C.T., Yang, J.C., Yeh, Y.K. and Chen, S.E. (2003), "Seismic performance of repaired hollow-bridge piers", Construct.Build. Mater., 17(5), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00119-8
  10. Ghobarah, A. (2001), "Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development", Eng. Struct., 23, 878-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0
  11. JTG (2004), JTG D62-2004 Code for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts, Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
  12. JTG (2008), JTG/T B02-01-2008 Guideline for seismic design of highway bridges, Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
  13. Hoshikuma, J., Kawashima, K., Nagaya, K. and Taylor, A.W. (1997), "Stress-strain model for confined reinforced concrete in bridge piers", J. Struct. Eng., 123(5), 624-633. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(624)
  14. Kent, D.C. and Park, R. (1971), "Flexural member with confined concrete", J. Struct. Div., 97(7), 1969-1990.
  15. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1998), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct.Eng., 114(8), 1804-1849.
  16. Mo, Y.L., Yeh, Y.K. and Hsieh, D.M. (2004), "Seismic retrofit of hollow rectangular bridge columns", J. Compos. Construct., 8(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:1(43)
  17. Mo, Y.L. and Nien, I.C. (2002), "Seismic performance of hollow high-strength concrete bridge columns", J.Bridge Eng., 7(6), 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:6(338)
  18. Moehle, M.S., Calderone, A. and Henry, L. (2004), "Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns", J. Struct. Eng., 130, 869-879. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(869)
  19. Pinto, A.V., Molina, J. and Tsionis, G. (2003), "Cyclic tests on large-scale models of existing bridge piers with rectangular hollow cross-section", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(13), 1995- 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.311
  20. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", ASCE J.Struct. Eng., 5(3), 722-739.
  21. Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F. and Calvi, G.M. (1996), Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
  22. Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1987), "Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading", ACI Struct. J., 84(1), 61-75.
  23. Priestly, M.J.N. and Benzoni, G. (1996), "Seismic performance of circular columns with low longitudinal reinforcement ratios", ACI Struct. J., 93(4), 474-485.
  24. Scott, M.H. and Fenves, G.L. (2006), "Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam-column elements", J. Struct. Eng., 132(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(244)
  25. Scott, B.D., Park, R. and Priestly, M.J.N. (1982), "Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates", ACI J., 79(1), 13-27.
  26. Yeh, Y.K., Mo, Y.L. and Yang, C.Y. (2001), "Seismic performance of hollow circular bridge piers", ACI Struct. J., 98(6), 862-671.
  27. Yeh, Y.K., Mo, Y.L. and Yang, C.Y. (2002), "Seismic performance of rectangular hollow bridge columns", J. Struct. Eng., 128(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(60)
  28. Yeh, Y.K.; Mo, Y.L. and Yang, C.Y. (2002), "Full-scale tests on rectangular hollow bridge piers", Mater. Struct., 35(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1617/13699

피인용 문헌

  1. Hollow precast segmental prestressed concrete bridge columns with a shear resistant connecting element vol.44, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2016-0276
  2. Seismic performance of single pier skewed bridges with different pier-deck connections vol.10, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1467
  3. Pounding analysis of RC bridge considering spatial variability of ground motion vol.9, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.1029
  4. Performance assessment of advanced hollow RC bridge column sections vol.16, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.5.703
  5. Performance assessment of novel hollow and solid RC columns using simulation of shaking table test vol.69, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.16.00449
  6. Seismic fragility of a typical bridge using extrapolated experimental damage limit states vol.13, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.599
  7. Hollow bridge columns with triangular confining reinforcement vol.46, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0353
  8. Analytical seismic performance assessment of hollow reinforced-concrete bridge columns vol.71, pp.14, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.00463
  9. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Bridge Group Pile Foundations considering Fluid-Pile-Soil Interaction vol.2020, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8838813
  10. Seismic analysis of RC tubular columns in air-cooled supporting structure of TPP vol.18, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.5.581