DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-Dimensional Pre-Bent Titanium Implant for Concomitant Orbital Floor and Medial Wall Fractures in an East Asian Population

  • Lee, Kyung Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Ji Ung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Sung Tack (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Suk Wha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Eui Cheol (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.09.30
  • Accepted : 2013.12.18
  • Published : 2014.09.15

Abstract

Background The objective of this article is to evaluate clinical outcomes of combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture repair using a three-dimensional pre-bent titanium implant in an East Asian population. Methods Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed for 11 patients with concomitant orbital floor and medial wall fractures. A combined transcaruncular and inferior fornix approach with lateral canthotomy was used for the exposure of fractures. An appropriate three-dimensional preformed titanium implant was selected and inserted according to the characteristics of a given defect. Results Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 6 months (median, 4.07 months). All patients had a successful treatment outcome without any complications. Clinically significant enophthalmos was not observed after treatment. Conclusions Three-dimensional pre-bent titanium implants are appropriate for use in the East Asian population, with a high success rate of anatomic restoration of the orbital volume and prevention of enophthalmos in combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture cases.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen CT, Chen YR. Update on orbital reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;18:311-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833aafd2
  2. He Y, Zhang Y, An JG. Correlation of types of orbital fracture and occurrence of enophthalmos. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1050-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182564ef3
  3. Scolozzi P, Momjian A, Heuberger J, et al. Accuracy and predictability in use of AO three-dimensionally preformed titanium mesh plates for posttraumatic orbital reconstruction: a pilot study. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:1108-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb44b
  4. Cole P, Boyd V, Banerji S, et al. Comprehensive management of orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:57S-63S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260752.20481.b4
  5. Ahn HB, Ryu WY, Yoo KW, et al. Prediction of enophthalmos by computer-based volume measurement of orbital fractures in a Korean population. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24:36-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31815eb7ce
  6. Bratton EM, Durairaj VD. Orbital implants for fracture repair. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011;22:400-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283499409
  7. Strong EB, Fuller SC, Wiley DF, et al. Preformed vs intraoperative bending of titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;149:60-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813481430
  8. Metzger MC, Schon R, Tetzlaf R, et al. Topographical CT-data analysis of the human orbital floor. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.07.013
  9. Cheng AC, Lucas PW, Yuen HK, et al. Surgical anatomy of the Chinese orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24:136-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31816704f5
  10. Nagasao T, Hikosaka M, Morotomi T, et al. Analysis of the orbital floor morphology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:112-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2006.12.002
  11. Lee HB, Nunery WR. Orbital adherence syndrome secondary to titanium implant material. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:33-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181929b6e
  12. Kersey TL, Ng SG, Rosser P, et al. Orbital adherence with titanium mesh floor implants: a review of 10 cases. Orbit 2013;32:8-11. https://doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2012.736597

Cited by

  1. Combined Orbital Fractures: Surgical Strategy of Sequential Repair vol.42, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.424
  2. A Case of Aggravated Medial Orbital Wall Fracture After Reduction of Orbital Floor Fracture vol.26, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002118
  3. Considerations for the Management of Medial Orbital Wall Blowout Fracture vol.43, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.3.229
  4. Orbital Floor Fracture vol.17, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.3.111
  5. Virtual Fitting, Selection, and Cutting of Preformed Anatomic Orbital Implants vol.33, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000700
  6. Low-Cost 3D Printing Orbital Implant Templates in Secondary Orbital Reconstructions vol.33, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000884
  7. Reconstruction of Medial Orbital Wall Fractures without Subperiosteal Dissection: The "Push-Out" Technique vol.44, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01319
  8. Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction vol.32, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0193-1
  9. Orbital floor repair using patient specific osteoinductive implant made by stereolithography vol.233, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119721
  10. Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery vol.10, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_183_19
  11. 깊이 영상을 이용한 3D 프린팅 기반 환자 맞춤형 안와 임플란트의 설계 및 제작 vol.23, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2020.23.8.903
  12. Customized Orbit and Frontal Bone Implants vol.36, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721109