DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Time-dependent behaviour of interactive marine and terrestrial deposit clay

  • Chen, Xiaoping (MOE Key Laboratory of Disaster Forecast and Control in Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Jinan University) ;
  • Luo, Qingzi (MOE Key Laboratory of Disaster Forecast and Control in Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Jinan University) ;
  • Zhou, Qiujuan (Guangdong Technical College of Water Resources and Electric Engineering)
  • Received : 2013.09.24
  • Accepted : 2014.05.30
  • Published : 2014.09.25

Abstract

A series of one-dimensional consolidation tests and triaxial creep tests were performed on Nansha clays, which are interactive marine and terrestrial deposits, to investigate their time-dependent behaviour. Based on experimental observations of oedometer tests, normally consolidated soils exhibit larger secondary compression than overconsolidated soils; the secondary consolidation coefficient ($C_{\alpha}$) generally gets the maximum value as load approaches the preconsolidation pressure. The postsurcharge secondary consolidation coefficient ($C_{\alpha}$') is significantly less than $C_{\alpha}$. The observed secondary compression behaviour is consistent with the $C_{\alpha}/C_c$ concept, regardless of surcharging. The $C_{\alpha}/C_c$ ratio is a constant that is applicable to the recompression and compression ranges. Compared with the stage-loading test, the single-loading oedometer test can evaluate the entire process of secondary compression; $C_{\alpha}$ varies significantly with time and is larger than the $C_{\alpha}$ obtained from the stage-loading test. Based on experimental observations of triaxial creep tests, the creep for the drained state differs from the creep for the undrained state. The behaviour can be predicted by a characteristic relationship among axial strain rate, deviator stress level and time.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Shamrani, M. (1998), "Application of the $C_{\alpha}/C_{c}$concept to secondary compression of Sabkha soils", Can. Geotech. J., 35(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-053
  2. Arulanandan, K., Shen, C.K. and Young, R.B. (1971), "Undrained creep behaviour of a coastal organic silty clay", Geotechnique, 21(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1971.21.4.359
  3. Augustesen, A., Liingaard, M. and Lade, P.V. (2004), "Evaluation of time-dependent behavior of soils", Int. J. Geomech., 4(3), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004)4:3(137)
  4. Badv, K. and Sayadian, T. (2012), "An investigation into the geotechnical characteristics of Urmia peat", Iran. J. Sci. Tech.-Transact. Civil Eng., 36(C2), 167-180.
  5. Bishop, A.W. and Lovenbury, H.T. (1969), "Creep characteristics of two undisturbed clays", Proceedings of 7th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico, 1, 29-37.
  6. Burland, J.B. (1990), "On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays", Geotechnique, 40(3), 329-378. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.329
  7. Chen, X.P., Zeng, L.L., Lu, J., Qian, H. and Kuang, L.W. (2008), "Experiment study of mechanical behavior of structured clay", Chin. J. Rock Soil Mech., 29(12), 3223-3228.
  8. Deng, Y.F., Cui, Y.J., Tang, A.M., Li, X.L. and Sillen, X. (2012), "An experimental study on the secondary deformation of boom clay", Appl. Clay Sci., 59-60, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.02.001
  9. den Haan, E.J. and Edil, T.B. (1993), "Secondary and tertiary compression of peat", Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advances in Understanding and Modelling the Mechanical Behaviour of Peat, Rotterdam, Netherlands, June.
  10. Dhowian, A.W. and Edil, T.B. (1980), "Consolidation behavior of peats", Geotech. Test. J., 3(3), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10881J
  11. Fodil, A., Aloulou, W. and Hicher, P.Y. (1997), "Viscoplastic behavior of soft clay", Geotechnique, 47(3), 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.581
  12. Jesmani, M., Vaezi, R. and Kamalzare, M. (2012), "Correlation between $C_{\alpha}/C_{c}$ ratio and index parameters of soil", Quarter. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 45(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/09-060
  13. Mesri, G. (1973), "Coefficient of secondary compression", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 99(1), 123-137.
  14. Mesri, G. (2003), "Primary compression and secondary compression", Geotech. Spec. Pub., 119, 122-166.
  15. Mesri, G. and Castro, A. (1987), "Ca/Cc concept and K0 during secondary compression", J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE , 113(3), 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:3(230)
  16. Mesri, G. and Godlewski, P.M. (1977), "Time and stress compressibility interrelationship", J. Geotech. Eng. Div., ASCE, 103(5), 417-430.
  17. Mesri, G., Stark, T.D., Ajlouni, M.A. and Chen, C.S. (1997), "Secondary compression of peat with or without surcharging", J Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(5), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(411)
  18. Mesri, G., Ajlouni, M.A., Feng, T.W. and Lo, D.O.K. (2001), "Surcharging of soft ground to reduce sencondary compression", Proceedings of 3th International Conference on Soft Soil Engineering, Hong Kong, December, pp. 55-65.
  19. Miao, L., Zhang, J. and Wang, F. (2008), "Time-dependent deformation behavior of Jiangsu marine clay", Marine Georesour. Geotechnol., 26(2), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641190801952394
  20. Qiao, J.G., Huang, Z.G. and Huang, G.Q. (2002), "The mollisol layers digital terrain model of the Pearl River delta", Chin. J. Foshan Univ. (Natural Science Edition), 20(4), 47 -52.
  21. Santagata, M., Bobet, A., Johnston, C.T. and Hwang, J. (2008), "One-dimensional compression behavior of a soil with high organic matter content", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 134(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(1)
  22. Sheahan, T., Ladd, C. and Germaine, J. (1996), "Rate-dependent undrained shear behavior of saturated clay", J. Geotech. Eng., 122(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(99)
  23. Singh, A. and Mitchell, J.K. (1968), "General stress-strain-time function for soils", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 94(1), 21-46.
  24. Tavenas, F., Leroueil, S., La Rochelle, P. and Roy, M. (1978), "Creep behaviour of an undisturbed lightly overconsolidated clay", Can. Geotech. J., 15(3), 402-423. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-037
  25. Tian, W.M., Silva, A.J., Veyera, G.E. and Sadd, M.H., (1994), "Drained creep of undisturbed cohesive marine sediments", Can. Geotech. J., 31(6), 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-101
  26. Tong, F., Yin, J.H. and Pei, H.F. (2012), "Experimental study on complete consolidation behavior of Hong Kong marine deposits", Marine Georesour. Geotechnol., 30(4), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2011.626508
  27. Zeng, L.L. and Chen, X.P. (2009), "Analysis of mechanical characteristics of soft soil under different stress paths", Chin. J. Rock Soil Mech., 30(5), 1264-1270.
  28. Zhou, Q.J. and Chen, X.P. (2006), "Experimental study on creep characteristics of soft soils", Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 28(5), 626-630.
  29. Zhu, J.G. and Yin, J.H. (2001), "Drained creep behaviour of soft Hong Kong marine deposits", Geotechnique, 51(5), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.5.471

Cited by

  1. Experimental study on the performance of compensation grouting in structured soil vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.10.3.335
  2. Prediction of one-dimensional compression behavior of Nansha clay using fractional derivatives vol.35, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1217958
  3. A 1D model considering the combined effect of strain-rate and temperature for soft soil vol.18, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.18.2.133
  4. Numerical Simulation and Experiment Study on the Characteristics of Non-Darcian Flow and Rheological Consolidation of Saturated Clay vol.11, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071385
  5. An Investigation of Time-Dependent Deformation Characteristics of Soft Dredger Fill vol.2020, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861260