Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제7권3호
  • /
  • Pages.233-246
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new geomechanical approach to investigate the role of in-situ stresses and pore pressure on hydraulic fracture pressure profile in vertical and horizontal oil wells

  • Saberhosseini, Seyed Erfan (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Science and research branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Keshavarzi, Reza (Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Ahangari, Kaveh (Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.09
  • 심사 : 2014.05.10
  • 발행 : 2014.09.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Estimation of fracture initiation pressure is one of the most difficult technical challenges in hydraulic fracturing treatment of vertical or horizontal oil wells. In this study, the influence of in-situ stresses and pore pressure values on fracture initiation pressure and its profile in vertical and horizontal oil wells in a normal stress regime have been investigated. Cohesive elements with traction-separation law (XFEM-based cohesive law) are used for simulating the fracturing process in a fluid-solid coupling finite element model. The maximum nominal stress criterion is selected for initiation of damage in the cohesive elements. The stress intensity factors are verified for both XFEM-based cohesive law and analytical solution to show the validation of the cohesive law in fracture modeling where the compared results are in a very good agreement with less than 1% error. The results showed that, generally by increasing the difference between the maximum and minimum horizontal stress, the fracture pressure and its profile has been strongly changed in the vertical wells. Also, it's been clearly observed that in a horizontal well drilled in the direction of minimum horizontal stress, the values of fracture pressure have been significantly affected by the difference between overburden pressure and maximum horizontal stress. Additionally, increasing pore pressure from under-pressure regime to over-pressure state has made a considerable fall on fracture pressure in both vertical and horizontal oil wells.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ABAQUS (2011), ABAQUS Documentation, Version 6. 11-1.
  2. Barenblatt, G.I. (1962), "The mathematical theory of equilibrium of cracks in brittle fracture", Advances in Applied Mechanics, 7, 55-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2
  3. Batchelor, G.K. (1967), An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, p.615.
  4. Bowie, O.L. (1964), "Rectangular tensile sheet with symmetric edge cracks", Journal of Applied Mechanics, 31(2), 208-212. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3629588
  5. Camanho, P.P. and Davila, C.G. (2002), "Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials", NASA/TM-2002-211737, pp. 1-42.
  6. Chen, Z. (2011), "Finite element modeling of viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 88-89, 136-144.
  7. Chen, Z.R., Bunger, A.P., Zhang, X. and Jeffrey, R.G. (2009), "Cohesive zone finite element based modeling of hydraulic fractures", Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 22(5), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(09)60295-0
  8. Dugdale, D.S. (1960), "Yielding of steel sheets containing slits", Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 8(2), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2
  9. Fjaer, E. (2008), Petroleum Related Rock Mechanic, Elsevier Publication Books, p. 491.
  10. Huang, R., Sukumar, N. and Prevost, J.H. (2003), "Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method Part II: Numerical applications", Int. J. Solids Struct., 40, 7539-7552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.08.001
  11. Peirce, A. and Detournay, E. (2008), "An implicit level set method for modeling hydraulically driven fractures", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197(33-40), 2858-2885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.01.013
  12. Sarris, E. and Papanastasiou, P. (2011), "The influence of the cohesive process zone in hydraulic fracture modeling", International Journal of Fracture, 167(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9515-4
  13. Settari, A. and Cleary, M.P. (1984), "Three-dimensional simulation of hydraulic fracturing", J. Pet. Technol., 36(8), 1177-1190. https://doi.org/10.2118/10504-PA
  14. Tada, H., Paris, P.C. and Irwin, G.R. (1973), The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research Corp., Hellertown, PA, USA.
  15. Tomar, V., Zhai, J. and Zhou, M. (2004), "Bounds for element size in a variable stiffness cohesive finite element model", Int. J. Numer. Method. Eng., 61(11), 1894-1920. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1138
  16. Valco, P. and Economides, M.J. (1997), Hydraulic Fracture Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
  17. Zhang, G.M., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Wu, H.A. and Wang, X.X. (2010), "Three-dimensional finite element simulation and parametric study for horizontal well hydraulic fracture", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 72(3-4), 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.03.032
  18. Zhu, H.Y., Deng, J.G., Liu, S.J., Wen, M., Peng, C.Y., Li, J.R., Chen, Z.J., Hu, L.B., Lin, H. and Guang, D. (2014), "Hydraulic fracturing experiments of highly deviated well with oriented perforation technique", Geomechanics and Engineering, Int. J., 6(2), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.2.153

피인용 문헌

  1. In situ horizontal stress effect on plastic zone around circular underground openings excavated in elastic zones vol.8, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.6.783
  2. Stress field interference of hydraulic fractures in layered formation vol.9, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.5.645
  3. A fully coupled three-dimensional hydraulic fracture model to investigate the impact of formation rock mechanical properties and operational parameters on hydraulic fracture opening using cohesive elements method vol.10, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-2939-7
  4. Numerical Study on the Triaxial Stress Condition for Ring-like Fractures around Deep Underground Openings vol.48, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170202
  5. The influence of deviatoric and horizontal differential stress and pore pressure on hydraulic fracture opening by fully coupled 3D cohesive elements method vol.12, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4222-y
  6. Factors affecting waterproof efficiency of grouting in single rock fracture vol.12, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.5.771
  7. Coupling relevance vector machine and response surface for geomechanical parameters identification vol.15, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.15.6.1207
  8. An experimental study on the hydraulic fracturing of radial horizontal wells vol.17, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.17.6.535
  9. Analysis of permeability in rock fracture with effective stress at deep depth vol.22, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.22.5.375
  10. Modelling the coupled fracture propagation and fluid flow in jointed rock mass using FRACOD vol.22, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.22.6.529
  11. Fracability Evaluation Method and Influencing Factors of the Tight Sandstone Reservoir vol.2021, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7092143
  12. Numerical simulation and optimization of hydraulic fracturing operation in a sandstone-mudstone interbedded reservoir vol.14, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08506-0