전문가치면세정술 비용 지불의사가격

Willingness to Pay for Professional Tooth Cleaning in Implant Patients

  • 박경화 (한양대학교 일반대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 김윤신 (한양대학교 일반대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 이선미 (동남보건대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 한경순 (가천대학교 보건과학대학 치위생학과)
  • Park, Kyung-Hwa (Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Shin (Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Mi (Department of Dental Hygiene, Dongnam Health College) ;
  • Han, Gyeong-Soon (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Gachon University)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.30
  • 심사 : 2014.05.22
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30

초록

전문가치면세정술을 받은 임플란트 보철환자 214명을 대상으로 만족도와 지속여부 및 이유, 비용 지불의사가격과 관련요인을 분석한 결과 다음과 같다. 대상자의 전문가치면세정술 평균 만족도는 4.60점이었다. 성별에서는 남성이 높았으며, 연령에서 가장 높은 군은 40~49세 군이었고, 60세 이상 군이 가장 낮았으며, 음주횟수와 운동 횟수가 많을수록 높은 만족도를 나타냈다(p<0.05). 전문가치면세정술을 지속적으로 받을 의사는 92.5%를 나타냈으며, 이유로는 개운함이 84.7%였고, 비용지불은 84.1%가 의사가 있음을 밝혔으며, 지불가격은 평균 28,100원이었다. 월평균수입, 전문가치면세정술 만족도가 높을수록, 연령은 낮을수록 전문가치면세정술에 대한 지불의사가격이 높아졌으며, 남자가 여자보다 높은 가격을 형성하였다. 전문가치면세정술의 가격을 합리적이고 현실적으로 제시하여 정착시키는 것은 성공적인 임플란트 유지관리와 사회경제적 비용을 감소시키는 데 매우 유용할 것으로 기대된다.

This study aimed to arrive at reasonable and realistic prices for professional tooth cleaning (PTC) in order to expand its clinical utilization. The study involved 214 dental implant patients who received PTC. Cross-tabulation, one-way ANOVA, t-test, and stepwise multiple regression were performed for analysis. The mean satisfaction score was 4.60 points, and 92.5% of all subjects were willing to receive PTC consistently. The most common reason to receive PTC was a feeling of refreshment in 84.7%, and 84.1% were willing to pay for PTC. The mean willingness-to-pay price was 28,100 won, and the mode was 10,000 won. Willingness-to-pay price increased as average monthly income and satisfaction level for PTC were higher. The price also increased with age and was higher in women than men. Suggesting and settling reasonable and realistic prices for PTC are expected to be useful in maintaining the long-term health of the dental implant and reducing socio-economic costs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Albrektsson T, Isidor F: Concensus report of session. Proceedings of the 1st Eurpean workshop on periodontology. Quintessence Publishing, London, pp.365-369, 1994.
  2. Baron M, Haas R, Dörtbudak O, Watzek G: Experimentally induced peri-implantitis: a review of different treatment methods described in the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15: 533-544, 2000.
  3. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Schupback P, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG: Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part 2: histologic findings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12: 168-175, 1997.
  4. Schou S, Berglundh T, Lang NP: Surgical treatment of periimplantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19: 140-149, 2004.
  5. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Antimicrobial treatment of peri-implant diseases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 19: 128-139, 2004.
  6. Jang GW: Dental plaque control by professional toothbrushing. Korean Dent Assoc 39: 443-449, 2001.
  7. Park KH, Han GS: The effects of professional tooth cleaning and plaque control instruction on reduction of peri-implantitis. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 173-180, 2012.
  8. Jun GH, Choi GS, Kang LO: A study on appropriateness of price of medical care service in health insuranc. J Prev Med Public Health 31: 460-470, 1998.
  9. Meyerhoff J: Stated willingness to pay as hypothetical behaviour: Can attitudes tell us more? J Environ Plan Manag 49: 209-226, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500507959
  10. Lee SJ, Neumann PJ, Churchill WH, Cannon ME, Weinstein MC, Johannesson M: Patients' willingness to pay for autologous blood donation. Health Policy 40: 1-12, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(96)00879-2
  11. Ryan M, Ratcliffe J, Tucker J: Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal care. Soc Sci Med 44: 371-380, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00154-2
  12. Kim JD, Lee DS, Cho MK: The estimation of willing to pay using contingent valuation method. Rev Indust Manag 15: 173-191, 2002.
  13. Shin YC: An estimation on the benefit of environmental quality improvement by using CVM with dichotomous choice with a follow up elicitation method. Daejin School Bull 4: 49-71, 1996.
  14. Chung WJ, Lee SM, Shin KY, Lim SG, Cho KS: Analysis of willingness-to-quit cigarette price among Korean male adults. J Prev Med Public Health 41: 136-146, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.136
  15. Kim CH, Kim J, Kim CW: Change in periodontal status by professional toothbrushing, and patients' satisfaction. J Dent Hyg Sci 8: 261-266, 2008.
  16. Han JH, Kim KE: Comparison of expectation and satisfaction of implant patients in pre-post implant therapy. J Dent Hyg Sci 11: 121-127, 2011.
  17. Yoo EM, Hwang YS: Study for general characters of dental implant patients and satisfaction level of function by dental interest level. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 9: 456-467, 2009.
  18. Jo ED, Han GS: Influencing factors in the halitosis. J Korean Acad Oral Health 36: 272-281, 2012. https://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2012.36.4.272
  19. Kim EK, Kim YM, Kim MA: Estimation of nursing costs based on nurse visit time for long-term care services. J Korean Acad Nurs 40: 349-358, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.3.349
  20. Lee SJ: Cost analysis of home care with activity-based costing (ABC). J Korean Acad Nurs 34: 1117-1128, 2004.
  21. Lee JH, Kang CS: A study on the introduction of DRG to outpatient service fees of primary medical institution. Korea Rev Manag 4: 87-110, 2013.
  22. Im MH: New health technology assessment and health insurance coverage determinations in Canadian medicare. Health-Welfare Policy Forum 155: 66-76, 2009.