Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the effectiveness of core competency courses according to facilitating strategy of learning transfer focusing H Corporation

학습전이 촉진 전략에 따른 핵심역량교육의 효과성 연구 -H사 사례를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2014.05.23
  • Accepted : 2014.08.20
  • Published : 2014.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of core competency courses by scrutinizing H Corporation case. The primary data survey was taken from direct and indirect participants of H Corporation core competency courses. The findings from the study are as follow. Firstly, before-and-after average differences were significant in inspecting core competency courses. Secondly, participants' own expected core competency was comparatively lower than how observers evaluated the participants. Thirdly, Core competency courses directly and indirectly influenced on the business performance. Therefore, the conclusions of the study are firstly, core competency courses may work effectively for the goal of the company in changing employees' organizational behavior. Secondly, for the better result of the core competency courses, customized and integrated learning transfer model for the particular company should be designed from the beginning of the education.

본 연구의 목적은 H사에서 실시한 핵심역량교육을 사전-사후검사설계 및 성공사례기법을 적용 분석하여 학습전이 및 경영성과에의 기여 등 효과성을 검증하고 시사점을 제시하는데 있다. 핵심역량교육에 참여한 학습자 본인, 관찰자 집단(상사, 동료, 부하)을 대상으로 설문을 실시하여 1,012명의 응답을 최종분석에 활용하였다. 주요 연구결과는 첫째, 핵심역량교육의 사전-사후검사 평균차이가 유의미하였다. 둘째, 관찰자들이 인식하는 학습자들의 역량수준이 학습자 본인이 인식하는 것보다 높은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 성공사례기법을 통한 검증 결과 핵심역량교육이 경영성과에 직 간접적으로 기여한 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구의 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 인재상 공유를 위한 핵심역량교육이 조직성과에 직 간접적으로 기여하기 때문에 조직구성원의 행동 변화를 위한 효과적인 개입방법으로 적극활용해야 하겠다. 둘째, 핵심역량교육이 교육효과를 달성하기 위해서는 통합적 학습전이모형을 설계하고, 학습전이 촉진을 위한 학습자 개인과 조직의 협력적 분위기가 형성되어야 하겠다.

Keywords

References

  1. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M., Competence at work: Models for superior performance. NY: Wiley, 1993.
  2. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G., The core competence of the corporation. Havard Business Review, 1990.
  3. Broad, M. L., & Newstrom, J. W., Transfer of training: Action-packed strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
  4. J. C. Jung, Competency based curriculum. Hyundai HRD Journal, Seoul, 2000.
  5. Laughlin, C., & Bahl, L., Training is not the training: Getting business result from training. TU117, ASTD 2008 International Conference and Exposition. CA: ASTD, 2008.
  6. H. S. Oh, ASTD HRD Trend. Seoul: Hakjisa, 2009.
  7. Kirkpatrick, D. L., Evaluating training programs: The four levels(2nd ed.). CA: Berrett-Koehler, 1998.
  8. Phillips, J. J., Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Texas: Gulf Publishing company, 1991.
  9. White, R., Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, Vol 66, No. 5, pp. 297-333, 1959. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
  10. McClelland, D. C., Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, Vol 29, No. 1, pp. 1-14, 1973.
  11. Boyatzis, A. S., The competent manager: A model for effective performance. NY: Wiley, 1982.
  12. McLagan, P. A., Models for HRD practice(4th ed.). VA: ASTD, 1989.
  13. Y. K. Kim, The HRD consultants' perceptions of workplace learning and performance(WLP) competencies. Ph.D. dissertation, SoongSil University, 2011.
  14. J. I. Yoon, M. S. Kim, S. K. Yoon, M. J. Park, The essential characteristics and dimensions of competence as human ability. Korean Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 233-260, 2007.
  15. S. J. Go, A study on the influence factors of learning transfer of the core-value education and mutual influences among them. Master's thesis, JoongAng University, 2011.
  16. Noe, R. A., Employee training & development (3rd ed.), IL: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2005.
  17. K. S. Lee, Human resources development. Seoul: Hakjisa, 2014.
  18. Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C., Training for Impact: How to link training to business needs and measure the result. CA: Jossey-Bass, 1989.
  19. Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Kavanagh, M. J., Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 80, No. 2, pp. 239-252, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.239
  20. Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H., Evaluation in organizations. MA: Perseus, 2001.
  21. Eddy, E. R., & Tannenbaum, S. I., Transfer in an e-learning context. In E. F., III & T. T. Baldwin (eds), Improving learning transfer in organization (161-194). CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
  22. Royer, J. M., Theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, Vol 14, No. 1, pp. 53-69, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527909529207
  23. Stolovitch, H. D., & Yapi, A., Use of case study method to increase near and far transfer of learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, Vol 10, No. 2, pp. 64-82, 1997.
  24. Cormier, S. M. & Hagman, J. D., Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. NY: Academic Press, 1987.
  25. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N., Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, Vol 24, No. 2, pp. 113-142, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1
  26. Noe, R. A., Trainees' attributes and attitude: neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, Vol 11, No. 4, pp. 736-749, 1986.
  27. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N., The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model, Personnel Psychology, Vol 39, No. 3, pp. 497-523, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00950.x
  28. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K., Transfer of training: Review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, Vol 41, No. 2, pp. 63-105, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
  29. Richey, R. C., Designing Instruction for the Adult Learner. London: Kogan Page Ltd, 1992.
  30. Holton, E. F. III., In search of an interactive model for HRD evaluation, Academy of Human Resource Development 1995 Conference Proceedings.
  31. Holton, E. F. III., The flawed four-level evaluation model, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol 7, No. 1, pp. 5-21, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920070103
  32. Holton, E. F., Holton's evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol 7, pp. 37-54, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422304272080
  33. Holton, E. F. III., & Baldwin, T. T., Making transfer happen: an action perspective on learning transfer systems In E.F. Holton, T. T. Baldwin (Eds.) Improving learning transfer in organizations. CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
  34. Brinkerhoff, R. O., Achieving results from training. CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
  35. K. S. Lee, The impact of superior reinforcement on training outcomes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1997.