A Retrospective Study on the Risk Factors and the Effect of Higher Somatic Cell Count in Milk on Reproductive Performance in Dairy Cows

젖소에서 비유초기 체세포 증가 위험 요인 및 번식효율에 미치는 영향 분석 연구

  • Seo, Bo-Sung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Shin, Eun-Kyung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jae-Kwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyun-Gu (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Ill-Hwa (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • Accepted : 2014.08.08
  • Published : 2014.08.31

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the effect of somatic cell count (SCC) in milk during early lactation on reproductive performance in dairy cows. Data were collected on 774 cows from six dairy farms, including cow parity, dates of previous calving, artificial insemination, pregnancy diagnosis, incidence of postpartum endometritis, reproductive performance (the intervals from calving to first insemination and conception), milk production and SCC. Data on 774 lactations were grouped based on the average first 3 months postpartum linear somatic cell score (SCS) as T1 (< 3.0, n = 521), T2 (3.0 ${\leq}$ and < 4.0, n = 113), and T3 (${\geq}$ 4.0, n = 140) groups. The odds ratio (OR) for the probability of endometritis increased 1.6 (p < 0.05) and 3.2 times (p < 0.0001) in the T2 and T3 groups, respectively, compared with that in the T1 group. The hazard of first insemination by 150 days in milk (DIM) was lower in the T3 group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, p < 0.01) than in the T1 group. First insemination conception rate did not differ among the 3 groups (28.7-34.2%, p > 0.05). The hazard of pregnancy by 365 DIM in the T3 group was lower (HR: 0.75, p < 0.05 respectively) than in the T1 and T2 groups. The SCS during 4 to 7 months postpartum differed (p < 0.0001) among the 3 groups. Farm and cow parity were important risk factors for higher SCS (${\geq}$ 4.0). Multiparous cows were more likely to have a higher SCS (OR: 2.26, p = 0.0005) compared with primiparous cows. In conclusion, higher SCS (${\geq}$ 4.0) during early lactation was associated with decreased reproductive performance of dairy cows.

본 연구는 젖소에서 분만 후 비유초기 체세포 증가가 번식효율에 미치는 영향에 대하여 조사하였다. 774두의 젖소 자료를 분만 후 3개월 평균 체세포지수에 따라 T1(3.0 미만, n = 521), T2(3.0 이상 4.0 미만, n = 113) 및 T3(4.0 이상, n = 140) 군으로 구분하였다. 자궁내막염의 발생위험율(odds ratio)은 T1군에 비해 T2군 및 T3군이 각각 1.6배(p < 0.05) 및 3.2배(p < 0.0001) 증가하였다. 분만 후 150일까지 첫 수정율은 T1군에 비해 T3군이 낮았으나(hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, p < 0.01), 분만 후 첫수정 수태율은 각 군간에 차이가 나타나지 않았다(28.7-34.2%, p > 0.05). 분만 후 365일까지의 임신율은 T3군이 T1군 및 T2군에 비해 낮았다(HR = 0.75, p < 0.05). 분만 후 4 -7개월까지 체세포지수는 각 군간에 차이가 인정되었다(p < 0.0001). 체세포지수 4이상 도달 위험요인은 목장(p < 0.05) 및 산차(p = 0.0005)와 관련되었으며, 초산차에 비해 2산이상의 젖소에서 2.3배의 높은 위험도를 나타내었다. 결론적으로, 젖소에서 비유초기 4.0 이상의 높은 체세포지수는 이후 번식효율의 감소를 초래하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Archer SC, Mc Coy F, Wapenaar W, Green MJ. Association between somatic cell count early in the first lactation and the longevity of Irish dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 2939-2950. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6115
  2. Barker AR, Schrick FN, Lewis MJ, Dowlen HH, Oliver SP. Influence of clinical mastitis during early lactation on reproductive performance in Jersey cows. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 1285-1290. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75690-5
  3. Cicconi-Hogan KM, Gamroth M, Richert RM, Ruegg PL, Stiglbauer KE, Schukken YH. Associations of risk factors with somatic cell count in bulk tank milk on organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 3689-3702. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6271
  4. DeGraves FJ, Fetrow F. Economics of mastitis and mastitis control. The Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice Update on Bovine Mastitis. 1993; 9: 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30611-3
  5. DeVries TJ, Aarnoudse MG, Barkema HW, Leslie KE, von Keyserlingk MAG. Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 5730-5739. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5375
  6. do Amaral BC, Connor EE, Tao S, Hayen MJ, Bubolz JW, Dahl GE. Heat stress abatement during the dry period influences metabolic gene expression and improve immune status in the transition period of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 86-96. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-3004
  7. Dohoo IR, Leslie KE. Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intra-mammary infections. Prev Vet Med 1991; 10: 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(91)90006-N
  8. Eicker SW, Grohn YT, Hertl JA. The association between cumulative milk yield, days open, and days to first breeding in New York Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1996; 79: 235-241. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76356-7
  9. Grohn YT, Eicker SW, Ducrocq V, Hertl JA. Effect of disease on the culling of Holstein dairy cows in New York State. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 966-978. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75657-7
  10. Hamann J. Diagnosis of mastitis and indicators of milk quality. In: Mastitis in dairy production: Current knowledge and future solution (ed. Hogeveen H), Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers. 2005: 82-91.
  11. Huszenicza G, Janosi S, Kulcsar M, Korodi P, Dieleman SJ, Bartyik J, Rudas P, Ribiczei-Szabo P. Gram-negative mastitis in early lactation may interfere with ovarian and certain endocrine functions and metabolism in dairy cows. Reprod Dom Anim 1998; 33: 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1998.tb01333.x
  12. Kim IH, Na KJ, Yang MP. Immune responses during the peripartum period in dairy cows with postpartum endometritis. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51: 757-764. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.17036
  13. Klass IC, Wessels U, Rothfuss H, Tenhagen B-A, Heuwieser W, Schallenberger E. Factors affecting reproductive performance in German Holstein-Friesian cows with a special focus on postpartum mastitis. Livest Prod Sci 2004; 86: 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.09.004
  14. Miller GY, Bartlett PC, Lance SE, Anderson S, Heider LE. Costs of clinical mastitis and mastitis prevention in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202: 1230-1236.
  15. Moore DA, Cullor JS, Bondurant RH, Sischo WM. Preliminary field evidence for the association of clinical mastitis with altered interestrus intervals in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 1991; 36: 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90384-P
  16. Mrode RA, Swanson GJT. Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Anim Breed Abstr 1996; 64: 847-857.
  17. Pantoja JCF, Hulland C, Ruegg PL. Dynamics of somatic cell counts and intramammary infections across the dry period. Prev Vet Med 2009; 90: 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.012
  18. Pinedo PJ, Melendez P, Villagomez-Cortes JA, Risco CA. Effect of high somatic cell counts on reproductive performance of Chilean dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 1575-1580. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1783
  19. Rajala-Schultz PJ, Grohn YT, McCulloch CE, Guard CL. Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82: 1213-1220. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75344-0
  20. Rekik B, Ajili N, Belhani H, Ben Gara A, Houissi H. Effect of somatic cell count on milk and protein yields and female fertility in Tunisian Holstein dairy cows. Livest Sci 2008; 116: 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.11.001
  21. Reneau JK. Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell counts in mastitis control. J Dairy Sci 1986; 69: 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80590-2
  22. Reneau JK, Seykora AJ, Heins BH, Endres MI, Farnsworth RJ, Bey RF. Association between hygiene scores and somatic cell scores in dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 1297-1301. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.227.1297
  23. Risco CA, Donovan GA, Hernandez J. Clinical mastitis associated with abortion in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82: 1684-1689. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75397-X
  24. Ruegg PL, Pantoja JCF. Understanding and using somatic cell counts to improve milk quality. Ir J Agr Food Res 2013; 52: 101-117.
  25. Santos JEP, Cerri RLA, Ballou MA, Higginbotham GE, Kirk JH. Effect of timing of first clinical mastitis occurrence on lactational and reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2004; 80: 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00133-7
  26. Schepers AJ, Lam TJ, Schukken YH, Wilmink JB, Hanekamp WJ. Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1833-1840. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76118-6
  27. Shook GE, Schutz MM. Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. J Dairy Sci 1993; 77: 648-658.
  28. Smith KL, Hogan JS. Environmental mastitis. The Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice Update on Bovine Mastitis. 1993; 9: 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30616-2
  29. Sordillo LM, Shafer-Weaver K, DeRosa D. Immunobiology of the mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1851-1865. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76121-6
  30. Summer A, Sandri S, Francheschi P, Malacarne M, Formaggioni P, Mariani P. Seasonal trend of some parameters of the milk quality payment for Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 6: 475-477.
  31. Tadich N, Kruze J, Locher G, Green LE. Risk factors associated with BMSCC greater than 200 000 cells/ml in dairy herds in southern Chile. Prev Vet Med 2003; 58: 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00002-3
  32. Tsolov S, Dimitrov M, Koleva M. The gynaecological state of cows in relation to their mastitis morbidity. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IDF International Mastitis Seminar, Tel-Aviv, Israel, S4. Haifa, Israel: M. Lachmann Printers LTD. 1995: 78-79.
  33. Walsh RB, Kelton DF, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Walton JS, LeBlanc SJ. Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum anovulatory condition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 315-324. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72632-2