Korean Journal of Cognitive Science (인지과학)

The Korean Society for Cognitive Science (한국인지과학회)
권호 표지

A Review on the Models of Letter Transposition Effect and Exploration of Hangul Model

단어재인에 있어서 글자교환 효과와 한글 처리 모형 탐색

  • Received : 2014.01.08
  • Accepted : 2014.01.10
  • Published : 2014.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Growing boy of studies focus on the letter transposition effect since it gives the information on how letters are coded and what variables are involved in the processes of word recognition. This review investigated various models on letter transposition effect. While most proposed models rely mainly on the bottom-up processes, evidences from various studies suggested the necessity of the top-down variables based on the cognitive processing mechanism. Especially, empirical evidences suggested that Hangul model should include a position specific processing mechanism based on onset, vowel, and coda of the Korean character.

단어내의 글자들을 교환하여 제시할 경우 원래의 단어로 혼동하는 현상인 글자 교환 효과에 대한 연구가 활발하다. 이는 글자교환 효과에 대한 연구가 시각단어 재인시 글자가 어떻게 부호화 되는지와 단어재인 초기과정에 영향을 주는 변인과 처리과정에 대한 정보를 제공하기 때문이다. 본 소고에서는 글자교환 효과에 대한 기존의 설명 모형들을 살펴보고, 하향적 인지적 처리를 반영하는 모형의 필요성을 논의하였다. 특히 한글 처리의 경우, 글자의 위치가 정해져 있지 않고 유동적이라고 보는 기존의 모델들과 달리 하향식으로 글자의 위치가 어휘 하위 단위인 초성, 중성, 종성으로 지정되어 있다는 가정이 필요하다. 따라서 이에 기반한 모형을 탐색하고 추후 연구방향을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
  2. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.923
  3. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
  4. Frankish, C., & Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
  5. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: "Some words to talk about words" (pp.1-23). New York: Nova Science.
  6. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?, Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
  7. Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 134-144 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134
  8. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006a). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 418-422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193863
  9. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006b). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? Experimental Psychology, 53, 308-315 https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.308
  10. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with non-adjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
  11. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. I. (2007). Masked form priming with extreme transposition, Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
  12. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
  13. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198
  14. Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
  15. Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 129-134 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y
  16. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: Impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913-918. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194121
  17. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determine the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 9141-156.
  18. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D., (2010). Letter oreder is not coded by open bigrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 135-150.
  19. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
  20. Davis, C. J. (2010). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22 (5), 695-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903155682
  21. Whitney, C. (2008). Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain & Language, 107, 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.002
  22. Treiman, R. (1986). The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 476-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90039-2
  23. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance, XII. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Limited.
  24. Fowler, C,A., Treiman, R., & Gross, J. (1993). The Structure of English Syllables and Polysyllables. Journal of Momory and Language, 32, 115-140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1007
  25. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck. M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 559-567. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197098
  26. Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes are functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition, 18, 419-427. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197130
  27. Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994-2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009
  28. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92 https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578146
  29. Perea, M., & Perez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802053924
  30. Frankish, C., Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
  31. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
  32. Berent, C. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A Rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 107, 146-184.
  33. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579714
  34. Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G. (1999). Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2077
  35. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. & Lupker, S. J. (Eds), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 279-305). New York: Psychology Press.
  36. Rastle, K., Davis, M., H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brouthel: Morphological-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742
  37. Dunabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
  38. Beyersmann, E., Mccormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (in press). Letter transpositions within morphems and across morphem boundaries. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
  39. Kwon, Y., Lee, C. H., Jeon, M. & Lee, Y. (under review). The role of phonological information in letter transposition effects: An event-related potential investigation.
  40. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263-279 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841
  41. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
  42. Kim, K., Lee, Y., & Lee, C. (2012). Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 291-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000076
  43. Taft, M., & Krebs-Lazendic, L. (2013). The role of orthographic syllable structure in assigning letters to their position in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 68, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.004
  44. Simpson, G., & Kang, H. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing, 17, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000013808.65933.a1