References
- Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics: OUP USA.
- Dehaene, S. (2001). Precis of the number sense. Mind & Language, 16(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00154
- Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current opinion in neurobiology, 14(2), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008
- Brannon, E. M., Jordan, K. E., & Jones, S. M. (2010). Behavioral signatures of numerical cognition. Primate Neuroethology. Oxford University Press, USA, 144-159.
- Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282(5389), 746-749. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5389.746
- Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382-10385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812142106
- Jordan, K., Brannon, E. M., Logothetis, N. K., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2005). Monkeys match the number of voices they hear to the number of faces they see. Current Biology, 15(11), 1034-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.056
- Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306(5695), 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102085
- Xu, F. and Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74, B1-B11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00066-9
- Libertus, M. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2010). Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. Developmental science, 13(6), 900-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00948.x
- Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the "number sense": The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental psychology, 44(5), 1457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012682
- Halberda, J., Ly, R., Wilmer, J. B., Naiman, D. Q., & Germine, L. (2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(28), 11116-11120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200196109
- Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Sensation and perception: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
- Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665-668. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07246
- Lourenco, S. F., Bonny, J. W., Fernandez, E. P., & Rao, S. (2012). Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(46), 18737-18742. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207212109
- Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2013). Is approximate number precision a stable predictor of math ability?. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.001
- Halberda, J., Sires, S. F., & Feigenson, L. (2006). Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated in parallel. Psychological Science, 17(7), 572-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01746.x
- Libertus, M. E., Odic, D., & Halberda, J. (2012). Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. Acta Psychologica, 141, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.009
- Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental science, 14(6), 1292-1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x
- Inglis, M., Attridge, N., Batchelor, S., & Gilmore, C. (2011). Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1222-1229. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0154-1
- Ansari, D., Lyons, I. M., van Eimeren, L., & Xu, F. (2007). Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1845-1853. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1845
- Price, G. R., Palmer, D., Battista, C., & Ansari, D. (2012). Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: Reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. Acta psychologica, 140(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.008
- Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Gilmore, C., Attridge, N., Clayton, S., Cragg, L., Johnson, S., Marlow, N., & Inglis, M. (2013). Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement. PloS one, 8(6), e67374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067374
- Fuhs, M. W., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low‐income homes: contributions of inhibitory control. Developmental science, 16(1), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12013
- Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007
- van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
- Tosto, M. G., Petrill, S. A., Halberda, J., Trzaskowski, M., Tikhomirova, T. N., Bogdanova, O. Y., ... & Kovas, Y. (2014). Why do we differ in number sense? Evidence from a genetically sensitive investigation. Intelligence, 43, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.007
- Ansari, D., Lyons, I. M., van Eimeren, L., & Xu, F. (2007). Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1845-1853. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1845
- 성태재 (1995). 타당도와 신뢰도. 학지사, 서울.
- DeWind, N. K., & Brannon, E. M. (2012). Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.
- Hurewitz, F., Gelman, R., & Schnitzer, B. (2006). Sometimes area counts more than number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19599-19604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609485103
- Mazzocco, M. M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). Child development, 82(4), 1224-1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01608.x
- Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., et al. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
- Leibovich, T., & Henik, A. (2013). Comparing performance in discrete and continuous comparison tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(5), 899-917.