DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Gut Microbiota of Tenebrio molitor and Their Response to Environmental Change

  • Jung, Jaejoon (Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Heo, Aram (Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Yong Woo (Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ye Ji (Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Koh, Hyelim (Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Woojun (Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2014.05.08
  • Accepted : 2014.05.26
  • Published : 2014.07.28

Abstract

A bacterial community analysis of the gut of Tenebrio molitor larvae was performed using pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. A predominance of genus Spiroplasma species in phylum Tenericutes was observed in the gut samples, but there was variation found in the community composition between T. molitor individuals. The gut bacteria community structure was not significantly affected by the presence of antibiotics or by the exposure of T. molitor larvae to a highly diverse soil bacteria community. A negative relationship was identified between bacterial diversity and ampicillin concentration; however, no negative relationship was identified with the addition of kanamycin. Ampicillin treatment resulted in a reduction in the bacterial community size, estimated using the 16S rRNA gene copy number. A detailed phylogenetic analysis indicated that the Spiroplasma-associated sequences originating from the T. molitor larvae were distinct from previously identified Spiroplasma type species, implying the presence of novel Spiroplasma species. Some Spiroplasma species are known to be insect pathogens; however, the T. molitor larvae did not experience any harmful effects arising from the presence of Spiroplasma species, indicating that Spiroplasma in the gut of T. molitor larvae do not act as a pathogen to the host. A comparison with the bacterial communities found in other insects (Apis and Solenopsis) showed that the Spiroplasma species found in this study were specific to T. molitor.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn JH, Hong IP, Bok JI, Kim BY, Song J, Weon HY. 2012. Pyrosequencing analysis of the bacterial communities in the guts of honey bees Apis cerana and Apis mellifera in Korea. J. Microbiol. 50: 735-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-012-2188-0
  2. Ben Ami E, Yuval B, Jurkevitch E. 2010. Manipulation of the microbiota of mass-reared Mediterranean fruit flies Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) improves sterile male sexual performance. ISME J. 4: 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.82
  3. Broderick NA, Lemaitre B. 2012. Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut Microbes 3: 307-321. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19896
  4. Brune A. 2014. Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12: 168-180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3182
  5. Cariveau DP, Elijah Powell J, Koch H, Winfree R, Moran NA. 2014. Variation in gut microbial communities and its association with pathogen infection in wild bumble bees (Bombus). ISME J. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.68.
  6. Carle P, Whitcomb RF, Hackett KJ, Tully JG, Rose DL, Bove JM, et al. 1997. Spiroplasma diabroticae sp. nov., from the southern corn rootworm beetle, Diabrotica undecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47: 78-80. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-47-1-78
  7. Ceja-Navarro JA, Nguyen NH, Karaoz U, Gross SR, Herman DJ, Andersen GL, et al. 2014. Compartmentalized microbial composition, oxygen gradients and nitrogen fixation in the gut of Odontotaenius disjunctus. ISME J. 8: 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.134
  8. Chang TH, Lo WS, Ku C, Chen LL, Kuo CH. 2014. Molecular evolution of the substrate utilization strategies and putative virulence factors in mosquito-associated Spiroplasma species. Genome Biol. Evol. 6: 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu033
  9. Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, et al. 2014. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D633- D642. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1244
  10. Corby-Harris V, Maes P, Anderson KE. 2014. The bacterial communities associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera) foragers. PLoS One 9: e95056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095056
  11. Dillon RJ, Dillon VM. 2004. The gut bacteria of insects: nonpathogenic interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49: 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123416
  12. Hackett KJ, Whitcomb RF, French FE, Tully JG, Gasparich GE, Rose DL, et al. 1996. Spiroplasma corruscae sp. nov., from a firefly beetle (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) and tabanid flies (Diptera: Tabanidae). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46: 947-950. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-4-947
  13. Hu Y, ukasik P, Moreau CS, Russell JA. 2014. Correlates of gut community composition across an ant species (Cephalotes varians) elucidate causes and consequences of symbiotic variability. Mol. Ecol. 23: 1284-1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12607
  14. Huang XF, Bakker MG, Judd TM, Reardon KF, Vivanco JM. 2013. Variations in diversity and richness of gut bacterial communities of termites (Reticulitermes flavipes) fed with grassy and woody plant substrates. Microb. Ecol. 65: 531-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0219-y
  15. Hurst GD, Jiggins FM. 2000. Male-killing bacteria in insects: mechanisms, incidence, and implications. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6: 329-336. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0604.000402
  16. Ishak HD, Plowes R, Sen R, Kellner K, Meyer E, Estrada DA, et al. 2011. Bacterial diversity in Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis geminata ant colonies characterized by 16S amplicon 454 pyrosequencing. Microb. Ecol. 61: 821-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9793-4
  17. Jung J, Yeom J, Kim J, Han J, Lim HS, Park H, et al. 2011. Change in gene abundance in the nitrogen biogeochemical cycle with temperature and nitrogen addition in Antarctic soils. Res. Microbiol. 162: 1018-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2011.07.007
  18. Jung J, Seo H, Lee SH, Jeon CO, Park W. 2013. The effect of toxic malachite green on the bacterial community in Antarctic soil and the physiology of malachite green-degrading Pseudomonas sp. MGO. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 4511- 4521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4669-9
  19. Kautz S, Rubin BE, Russell JA, Moreau CS. 2013. Surveying the microbiome of ants: comparing 454 pyrosequencing with traditional methods to uncover bacterial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03107-12
  20. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, et al. 2012. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62: 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0
  21. Kim JK, Kim NH, Jang HA, Kikuchi Y, Kim CH, Fukatsu T, Lee BL. 2013. Specific midgut region controlling the symbiont population in an insect-microbe gut symbiotic association. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 7229-7233. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02152-13
  22. Köhler T, Dietrich C, Scheffrahn RH, Brune A. 2012. Highresolution analysis of gut environment and bacterial microbiota reveals functional compartmentation of the gut in woodfeeding higher termites (Nasutitermes spp.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 4691-4701. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00683-12
  23. Lizé A, McKay R, Lewis Z. 2013. Gut microbiota and kin recognition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 325-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.013
  24. Mateos M, Castrezana SJ, Nankivell BJ, Estes AM, Markow TA, Moran NA. 2006. Heritable endosymbionts of Drosophila. Genetics 174: 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.058818
  25. Martínez-Rodríguez P, Herández-Pérez M, Bella JL. 2013. Detection of Spiroplasma and Wolbachia in the bacterial gonad community of Chorthippus parallelus. Microb. Ecol. 66: 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0226-z
  26. McFrederick QS, Mueller UG, James RR. 2014. Interactions between fungi and bacteria influence microbial community structure in the Megachile rotundata larval gut. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281: 20132653. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2653
  27. Noh JY, Patnaik BB, Tindwa H, Seo GW, Kim DH, Patnaik HH, et al. 2014. Genomic organization, sequence characterization and expression analysis of Tenebrio molitor apolipophorin-III in response to an intracellular pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes. Gene 534: 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.10.058
  28. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13: 2498-2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303
  29. Russell JA, Funaro CF, Giraldo YM, Goldman-Huertas B, Suh D, Kronauer DJ, et al. 2012. A veritable menagerie of heritable bacteria from ants, butterflies, and beyond: broad molecular surveys and a systematic review. PLoS One 7: e51027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051027
  30. Russell CW, Bouvaine S, Newell PD, Douglas AE. 2013. Shared metabolic pathways in a coevolved insect-bacterial symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 6117-6123. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01543-13
  31. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 7537-7541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09
  32. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 2725-2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197

Cited by

  1. Investigation of Gut-Associated Bacteria inTenebrio molitor(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Larvae Using Culture-Dependent and DGGE Methods vol.108, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/sav079
  2. Xenobiotics: Interaction with the Intestinal Microflora vol.56, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilv018
  3. Safety aspects of the production of foods and food ingredients from insects vol.61, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600520
  4. Sustainable farming of the mealworm Tenebrio molitor for the production of food and feed vol.72, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2017-0033
  5. A novel biological recovery approach for PHA employing selective digestion of bacterial biomass in animals vol.102, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8788-9
  6. Immune priming specificity within and across generations reveals the range of pathogens affecting evolution of immunity in an insect vol.87, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12661
  7. Production and recovery of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) from biodiesel liquid waste (BLW) vol.58, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800279
  8. Immune Defenses of a Beneficial Pest: The Mealworm Beetle, Tenebrio molitor vol.10, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00138
  9. Comparison of Six Commercial Meat Starter Cultures for the Fermentation of Yellow Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Paste vol.7, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110540
  10. The yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) genome: a resource for the emerging insects as food and feed industry vol.6, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2019.0057
  11. Bacterial community profile after the lethal infection of Steinernema-Xenorhabdus pairs into soil-reared Tenebrio molitor larvae vol.96, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa009
  12. Impact of heat treatment on microbiota of black soldier fly larvae reared on soybean curd residues vol.7, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2020.0108
  13. Genetic and genomic selection in insects as food and feed vol.7, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2020.0097
  14. Probiotic properties of an indigenous Pediococcus pentosaceus strain on Tenebrio molitor larval growth and survival vol.7, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2020.0156