DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy and applicable range of a reconstruction technique for hybrid rockets

  • Received : 2013.10.29
  • Accepted : 2014.02.05
  • Published : 2014.07.25

Abstract

Accuracy of a reconstruction technique assuming a constant characteristic exhaust velocity ($c^*$) efficiency for reducing hybrid rocket firing test data was examined experimentally. To avoid the difficulty arising from a number of complex chemical equilibrium calculations, a simple approximate expression of theoretical $c^*$ as a function of the oxidizer to fuel ratio (${\xi}$) and the chamber pressure was developed. A series of static firing tests with the same test conditions except burning duration revealed that the error in the calculated fuel consumption decreases with increasing firing duration, showing that the error mainly comes from the ignition and shutdown transients. The present reconstruction technique obtains ${\xi}$ by solving an equation between theoretical and experimental $c^*$ values. A difficulty arises when multiple solutions of ${\xi}$ exists. In the PMMA-LOX combination, a ${\xi}$ range of 0.6 to 1.0 corresponds to this case. The definition of $c^*$ efficiency necessary to be used in this reconstruction technique is different from a $c^*$ efficiency obtained by a general method. Because the $c^*$ efficiency obtained by average chamber pressure and ${\xi}$ includes the $c^*$ loss due to the ${\xi}$ shift, it can be below unity even when the combustion gas keeps complete mixing and chemical equilibrium during the entire period of a firing. Therefore, the $c^*$ efficiency obtained in the present reconstruction technique is superior to the $c^*$ efficiency obtained by the general method to evaluate the degree of completion of the mixing and chemical reaction in the combustion chamber.

Keywords

References

  1. Carmicino, C. and Sorge, A.R. (2005), "Role of injection in hybrid rockets regression rate behavior", J. Propul. Power, 21(4), 606-612. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9945
  2. Carmicino, C and Sorge, A.R. (2006), "Influence of a conical axial injector on hybrid rocket performance", J. Propul. Power, 22(5), 984-995. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19528
  3. Chiaverini, M.J., Serin, N., Johnson, D.K., Lu, Y.C., Kuo, K.K. and Risha, G.A. (2000), "Regression rate behavior of hybrid rocket solid fuels", J. Propul. Power, 16(1), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5541
  4. Evans, B., Risha, G.A., Favorito, N., Boyer, E., Wehrman, R., Libis, N. and Kuo, K.K. (2003), "Instantaneous regression rate determination of a cylindrical x-Ray transparent hybrid rocket motor", 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2003-4592.
  5. Frederick Jr., R.A. and Greiner, B.E. (1996), "Laboratory-scale hybrid rocket motor uncertainty analysis", J. Propul. Power, 12(3), 605-611. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.24076
  6. George, P., Krishnan, S., Varkey, P.M., Ravindran, M. and Ramachandran, L. (2001), "Fuel regression rate in hydroxyl-terminated-polybutadiene/gaseous-oxygen hybrid rocket motors", J. Propul. Power, 17(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5704
  7. Gordon, S. and McBride, B.J. (1994), "Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications", NASA Reference Publication, RP-1311.
  8. Karabeyoglu, M.A., Cantwell, B.J. and Zilliac, G. (2007), "Development of scalable space-time averaged regression rate expressions for hybrid rockets", J. Propul. Power, 23(4), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19226
  9. Nagata, H., Okada, K., Sanda, T., Akiba, R., Satori, S. and Kudo, I (1998), "New fuel configurations for advanced hybrid rockets", 49th International Astronautical Congress, IAF-98-S.3.09
  10. Nagata, H., Ito, M., Maeda, T., Watanabe, M., Uematsu, T., Totani, T. and Kudo, I. (2006), "Development of CAMUI hybrid rocket to create a market for small rocket experiments", Acta. Astronautica, 59(1-5), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.02.031
  11. Olliges, J.D., Lilly, T.C., Joslyn, T.B. and Ketsdever, A.D. (2008), "Time accurate mass flow measurements of solid-fueled systems", Rev. Sci. Instrum., 79, 101301.
  12. Osmon, R.V. (1966), "An Experimental Investigation of a Lithium Aluminum Hydride-Hydrogen Peroxide Hybrid Rocket", J. Aerospace Eng., 62(61), 92-102.
  13. Sutton, G.P. and Biblarz, O. (2000), Rocket Propulsion Elements (7th Edition), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  14. Wernimont, E.J. and Heister, S.D. (1999), "A reconstruction technique for reducing hybrid rocket combustion test data", J. Propul. Power, 15(1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5401
  15. Zilwa, S.D., Zilliac, G., Reinath, M. and Karabeyoglu, M.A. (2004), "Time-resolved fuel-grain port diameter measurement in hybrid rockets", J. Propul. Power, 20(4), 684-689. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.2188

Cited by

  1. Novel Comprehensive Technique for Hybrid Rocket Experimental Ballistic Data Reconstruction vol.34, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36517
  2. Verification Firings of End-Burning Type Hybrid Rockets vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36359
  3. Method for Determining Nozzle-Throat-Erosion History in Hybrid Rockets vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36390
  4. Investigation of the Throttling Characteristics of Axial-injection End-burning Hybrid Rockets vol.65, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2322/jjsass.65.157
  5. Fuel Regression Characteristics of a Novel Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Rocket vol.34, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36369
  6. High Pressure Fuel Regression Characteristics of Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Rockets vol.35, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37135
  7. Investigation of axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression vol.4, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2017.4.3.281
  8. Comprehensive Data Reduction for N2O/HDPE Hybrid Rocket Motor Performance Evaluation vol.6, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6040045
  9. Reconstructed Ballistic Data Versus Wax Regression-Rate Intrusive Measurement in a Hybrid Rocket vol.57, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a34695
  10. Evaluation of Hybrid Rocket Fuel Grain with a Star Fractal Port Using Combustion Experiments vol.19, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2322/tastj.19.295
  11. New Entrainment Model for Modelling the Regression Rate in Hybrid Rocket Engines vol.37, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b38333