한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제15권8호
  • /
  • Pages.4821-4830
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

그래픽디자인 리서치 수행에 관한 연구

A way of undertaking a research phase in graphic design

  • 이연준 (홍익대학교 시각디자인학과)
  • 투고 : 2014.06.02
  • 심사 : 2014.08.07
  • 발행 : 2014.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 그래픽 디자인에서 디자인리서치의 중요성과 사회와 인간과 함께하는 디자인적 방법(Design tools)의 이해 고취가 목표이다. 본 연구는 총 60명을 대상으로 연구를 진행하였으며, 참여자들은 IDEO 툴킷(방법)을 활용하였다. 총 세 개의 설문조사가 이루어졌으면 두 개의 설문지는 동일한 형태로 프로젝트 참여 '사전'과 '사후'에 각각 사용되었다. 마지막은 학생들의 작업을 평가하기 위해 전문가 6인의 조사가 이루어졌다. 예비분석에서는 학생들의 프로젝트 이전의 리서치 경향 인터넷과 문헌자료에 의존도가 매우 높고 체계적인 연구의 형태를 보이지 않았다. 본 분석을 통해서는 리서치에 많은 시간을 할애하고 디자인적 방법을 사용한 그룹의 평가가 긍정적으로 나타났다. 특히, '관찰'기법을 이용한 그룹의 긍정적 평가가 높게 나타났다.

This paper highlights the importance of design research and encourages an understanding of design tools that engage society and people. Twenty groups, a total of sixty students, were asked to participate in this project and they used an IDEO tool kit. A total of three surveys were given. One survey was given to the participants before participating in the project and another after the project. The last survey was given to six experts to evaluate the students' work. Preliminary analysis found that students, prior to participating in the project, replied heavily on Internet research and a literature review, and did not display a structured research process. Primary analysis showed that the groups that spent more time on research and utilised design tools performed better, particularly those utilising 'observation' techniques.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bruce, M., & Bessant, J. (2002). Design in business: Strategic innovation through design. UK: Pearson Education.
  2. Frascara, J. (1988). Graphic design: Fine art or social science? Design Issues, 18-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511556
  3. Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056
  4. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511637
  5. Roth, S. (1999). The state of design research. Design Issues, 15(2), 18-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511839
  6. Buchanan, R. (1998). Branzi's dilemma: Design in contemporary culture. Design Issues, 14(1), 3-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511825
  7. Bennett, A. (2012). Good design is good social change: Envisioning an age of accountability in communication design. Visible Language, 46(1/2), 66-79.
  8. Bennett, A. (2006). The rise of research in graphic design. In A. Bennett (Ed.), Design studies: Theory and research in graphic design (pp. 14-25). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  9. Forlizzi, J., & Lebbon, C. (2002). From formalism to social significance in communication design. Design Issues, 18(4), 3-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/074793602320827389
  10. Tyler, A. (2006). Educating design citizens: Passing on a mind, body, spirit practice. In A. Bennett (Ed.), Design studies: Theory and research in graphic design (pp. 333-353). New York: Princeton Arc
  11. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice from the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
  12. Morrison, A. (2013). Norwegian optimism about the future of design research. Swedish Design Research Journal, 1, 4-12.
  13. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1, 1-5.
  14. Sanders, E.B.-N., & Stappers J. P. (2012). Convivial design toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam; Enfield: BIS; Publishers Group UK [distributor].
  15. Collins, H. (2010). Research methods in design management. Lausanne: AVA Publishing.
  16. Swann, C. (2002). Action research and the practice of design. Design Issues, 18(1), 49-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/07479360252756287
  17. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. NY, USA: HarperCollins.
  18. Lunenfeld, P. (2003). The design cluster. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Design research: Methods and perspectives (pp. 10-15). Mass: The MIT Press.
  19. Heller, A. (2006). Shaping belief: The role of audience. In A. Bennett (Ed.), Design studies: Theory and research in graphic design (pp. 10-13). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  20. Sanders, E.B.-N. (2002). From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In J. Frascara (Ed.), Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections (pp. 1-8). New York: Taylor and Francis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203301302.ch1
  21. Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. (2001). It's not what you think. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 89-93.
  22. Beverland, M. (2010). Right-Wing customers-the enemy of innovation. Design Management Review, 21(3), 64-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00081.x
  23. Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Press.
  24. Dahl, D. W., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (1999). The use of visual mental imagery in new product design. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 36(1), 18-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151912
  25. Breslin, M., & Buchanan, R. (2008). On the case study method of research and teaching in design. Design Issues, 24(1), 36-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.1.36