The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of metal surface grinding at the porcelain try-in stage of fixed dental prostheses

  • Kilinc, Halil Ibrahim (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University) ;
  • Kesim, Bulent (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University) ;
  • Gumus, Hasan Onder (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University) ;
  • Dincel, Mehmet (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University) ;
  • Erkaya, Selcuk (Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erciyes University)
  • Received : 2014.03.11
  • Accepted : 2014.05.28
  • Published : 2014.08.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was to evaluate the effect of grinding of the inner metal surface during the porcelain try-in stage on metal-porcelain bonding considering the maximum temperature and the vibration of samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ninety-one square prism-shaped ($1{\times}1{\times}1.5mm$) nickel-chrome cast frameworks 0.3 mm thick were prepared. Porcelain was applied on two opposite outer axial surfaces of the frameworks. The grinding was performed from the opposite axial sides of the inner metal surfaces with a low-speed handpiece with two types of burs (diamond, tungsten-carbide) under three grinding forces (3.5 N, 7 N, 14 N) and at two durations (5 seconds, 10 seconds). The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed with universal testing machine. Statistical analyzes were performed at 5% significance level. RESULTS. The samples subjected to grinding under 3.5 N showed higher SBS values than those exposed to grinding under 7 N and 14 N (P<.05). SBS values of none of the groups differed from those of the control group (P>.05). The types of bur (P=.965) and the duration (P=.679) did not affect the SBS values. On the other hand, type of bur, force applied, and duration of the grinding affected the maximum temperatures of the samples, whereas the maximum vibration was affected only by the type of bur (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Grinding the inner metal surface did not affect the metal-porcelain bond strength. Although the grinding affected the maximum temperature and the vibration values of the samples, these did not influence the bonding strength.

Keywords

References

  1. Lombardo GH, Nishioka RS, Souza RO, Michida SM, Kojima AN, Mesquita AM, Buso L. Influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramics fused to cobalt-chromium. J Prosthodont 2010;19:103-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00546.x
  2. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.; 1997. p. 455-84.
  3. do Prado RA, Panzeri H, Fernandes Neto AJ, das Neves FD, da Silva MR, Mendonca G. Shear bond strength of dental porcelains to nickel-chromium alloys. Braz Dent J 2005;16:202-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402005000300006
  4. Shillingburg HT Jr, Hobo S, Fisher DW. Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:276-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90007-3
  5. Faucher RR, Nicholls JI. Distortion related to margin design in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:149-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90178-X
  6. Tao J, Han D. The effect of finish line curvature on marginal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns and metal-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 2009;40:745-52.
  7. Gemalmaz D, Alkumru HN. Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80272-0
  8. Papazoglou E, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Evaluation of high-temperature distortion of high-palladium metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:133-40. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113707
  9. Ushiwata O, de Moraes JV, Bottino MA, da Silva EG. Marginal fit of nickel-chromium copings before and after internal adjustments with duplicated stone dies and disclosing agent. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:634-43. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.106551
  10. Keys LG. An alternate method of verifying the seating of allceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:411. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121116
  11. Song XF, Yin L, Han YG, Wang H. In vitro rapid intraoral adjustment of porcelain prostheses using a high-speed dental handpiece. Acta Biomater 2008;4:414-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.08.006
  12. Kourtis SG, Tripodakis AP, Doukoudakis AA. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of different metal alloys and porcelains in the metal-ceramic complex. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:477-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.012
  13. Aladag A, Comlekoglu ME, Dundar M, Gungor MA, Artunc C. Effects of soldering and laser welding on bond strength of ceramic to metal. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60187-4
  14. de Vasconcellos LG, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Souza RO, Nogueira L Jr, Bottino MA, Ozcan M. Opaque layer firing temperature and aging effect on the flexural strength of ceramic fused to cobalt-chromium alloy. J Prosthodont 2010;19:471-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00600.x
  15. ISO 9693-1:2012. Dentistry--Compatibility testing-Part 1: Metal-ceramic systems. Geneva: Switerland; International Organization for Standardization; 2013.
  16. Hero H, Syverud M. Carbon impurities and properties of some palladium alloys for ceramic veneering. Dent Mater 1985;1:106-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80038-5
  17. Hammad IA, Talic YF. Designs of bond strength tests for metal-ceramic complexes: review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:602-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90244-9
  18. Brackett SE, Leary JM, Turner KA, Jordan RD. An evaluation of porcelain strength and the effect of surface treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:446-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90012-7
  19. Leinfelder KF. Porcelain esthetics for the 21st century. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:47S-51S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0402
  20. Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.003