DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of shear bond strength of repair acrylic resin to Co-Cr alloy

  • Kulunk, Safak (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, 19 Mayis University) ;
  • Kulunk, Tolga (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, 19 Mayis University) ;
  • Sarac, Duygu (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, 19 Mayis University) ;
  • Cengiz, Seda (Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University) ;
  • Baba, Seniha (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, 19 Mayis University)
  • Received : 2013.11.26
  • Accepted : 2014.05.22
  • Published : 2014.08.29

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different surface treatment methods and thermal ageing on the bond strength of autopolymerizing acrylic resin to Co-Cr. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Co-Cr alloy specimens were divided into five groups according to the surface conditioning methods. C: No treatment; SP: flamed with the Silano-Pen device; K: airborne particle abrasion with $Al_2O_3$; Co: airborne particle abrasion with silica-coated $Al_2O_3$; KSP: flamed with the Silano-Pen device after the group K experimental protocol. Then, autopolymerized acrylic resin was applied to the treated specimen surfaces. All the groups were divided into two subgroups with the thermal cycle and water storage to determine the durability of the bond. The bond strength test was applied in an universal test machine and treated Co-Cr alloys were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant differences among surface treatments and thermocycling. Their interactons were followed by a multiple comparison' test performed uing a post hoc Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. Surface treatments significantly increased repair strengths of repair resin to Co-Cr alloy. The repair strengths of Group K, and Co significantly decreased after 6,000 cycles (P<.001). CONCLUSION. Thermocycling lead to a significant decrease in shear bond strength for air abrasion with silica-coated aluminum oxide particles. On the contrary, flaming with Silano-Pen did not cause a significant reduction in adhesion after thermocycling.

Keywords

References

  1. Ohkubo C, Watanabe I, Hosoi T, Okabe T. Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium frameworks using five metal primers. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:50-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70088-6
  2. Bulbul M, Kesim B. The effect of primers on shear bond strength of acrylic resins to different types of metals. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:303-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60063-7
  3. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:184-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00261-0
  4. Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Oka M, Minagi S, Suzuki K, Irie M. Does plasma irradiation improve shear bond strength of acrylic resin to cobalt-chromium alloy? Dent Mater 2004;20: 509-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.04.001
  5. Shimizu H, Kurtz KS, Tachii Y, Takahashi Y. Use of metal conditioners to improve bond strengths of autopolymerizing denture base resin to cast Ti-6Al-7Nb and Co-Cr. J Dent 2006;34:117-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.05.002
  6. Banerjee S, Engelmeier RL, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of denture repair acrylic resins to primed base metal alloys using two different processing techniques. J Prosthodont 2009;18:676-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00499.x
  7. Pesun S, Mazurat RD. Bond strength of acrylic resin to co-balt-chromium alloy treated with the Silicoater MD and Kevloc systems. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64:798-802.
  8. Mudford L, Curtis RV, Walter JD. An investigation of debonding between heat-cured PMMA and titanium alloy (Ti-6A1-4V). J Dent 1997;25:415-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00051-6
  9. NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of denture base resins to nickel-chromiumberyllium removable partial denture alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:566-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70007-6
  10. Sharp B, Morton D, Clark AE. Effectiveness of metal surface treatments in controlling microleakage of the acrylic resinmetal framework interface. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:617-22. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.111497
  11. Sanohkan S, Urapepon S, Harnirattisai C, Sirisinha C, Sunintaboon P. Shear bond strength between autopolymerizing acrylic resin and Co-Cr alloy using different primers. Dent Mater J 2012;31:765-71. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-051
  12. Rached RN, Powers JM, Del Bel Cury AA. Repair strength of autopolymerizing, microwave, and conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:79-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.005
  13. Nagai E, Otani K, Satoh Y, Suzuki S. Repair of denture base resin using woven metal and glass fiber: effect of methylene chloride pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:496-500. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115183
  14. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:130-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00346.x
  15. Ishii T, Koizumi H, Tanoue N, Naito K, Yamashita M, Matsumura H. Effect of alumina air-abrasion on mechanical bonding between an acrylic resin and casting alloys. J Oral Sci 2009;51:161-6. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.161
  16. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Damerau G. Spark erosion as a metal-resin bonding system. Dent Mater 2007;23:193-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.009
  17. Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:1-8.
  18. Clelland NL, van Putten MC, Brantley WA, Knobloch LA. Adhesion testing of a denture base resin with 5 casting alloys. J Prosthodont 2000;9:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2000.00030.x

Cited by

  1. Study vol.34, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4129