참고문헌
- Cassels, J. R. T. & Johnstone, A. H. (1984). The effect of language on student performance on multiple choice tests in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(7), 613-615. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed061p613
- Choi, S. K. (2012) A study on the development and application of reading material evaluation models for reading education based text complexity model. Korean Language Education, 139, 451-490.
- Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092
- Frey, N. & Fisher, D. (2007). Reading for information in elementary school: Content literacy strategies to build comprehenstion. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
- Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S. & Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Methods of automated text analysis. In M. L. Kamil, D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume IV (pp. 34-53). New York: Routledge.
- Kang, S. & Park, S. (2009). Comparison of the readabilities of science and social studies textbooks. Journal of International Gifted in Science, 3(1), 55-65.
- Kim, K. H. (2003). Words by levels for teaching Korean [등급별 국어교육용 어휘]. Seoul: Pakijung.
- Koh, H., Song, J. & Kang, S. (2010). A study on the readability of elementary school science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(2), 134-143.
- Kwak, J.-Y. (2010). The study of vocabulary in Korean textbook for primary school students. Han-Geul, 290, 265-295. https://doi.org/10.22557/HG.2010.12.290.265
- Kwak, Y. (2004). An evaluative study on the 7th national elementary-school science curriculum implementation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 1028-1038.
- Lee, M. A. (2013). An analysis on the vocabulary used in the elementary school science textbooks according to the 2007 revised curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
- Lee, S.-Y. (2011). A comparative study on readabilities of elementary school textbooks. Korean Language Education Research, 41, 169-193.
- Lim, C.-S., Yoon, H.-G., Jang, M.-D., Lim, H., Shin, D.-H., Kim, M., Park, H.-W., Lee, I.-S., Kwon, C.-S., Lee, D.-H. & Kim, N.-I. (2007). Developing an innovative framework of grade 3-4 science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(5), 580-595.
- Merzyn, G. (1987). The language of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090406
- Park, H.-S. (2005). Assessing the effects of item text characteristics on children's reading comprehension over time. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 779-798.
- Pickersgill, S. & Lock, R. (1991). Students understanding of selected non-technical words in science. Research in Science Education, 9(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514910090107
- Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Sim, J.-H. (1991). Research on model of readability measurement and factors which influence upon readability of Korean text. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University.
- Suh, H. (2011). A study on the elaboration of text complexity for the systematic reading edcuation (1) -Focused on critical perspectives about text complexity researches. Korean Language Education Research, 42, 433-460.
- Suh, H., Lee, S.-R., Ryu, S.-K., Oh, E.-H., Yoon, H.-S., Byun, K.-G. & Pyeon, J.-Y. (2013). A study on the elaborating the degree of text complexity for the systematic reading education (2). Korean Language Education Research, 47, 253-290.
- Tao, P. K. (1994). Words that matter in science: A study of Hong Kong students' comprehension of non-technical words in science. Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 15-23.
- Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W. & Powell, J. C. (2004). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Walpole, S., Hayes, L. & Robnolt, V. (2006). Matching second graders to text: The utility of a group-administered comprehension measure. Reading Research and Instruction, 46(1), 1-22
- Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia: Open University press.
- Wright, J. D. & Spiegel, D. L. (1984). Teacher-to-teacher: How important is textbook readability to biology teachers? American Biology Teacher, 46(4), 221-225. https://doi.org/10.2307/4447819
- Yun, C.-U. (2006). A study on the development of a readability formula in non-literary texts. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
- Yun, E. & Park, Y. (2009). Research of scientific terms for physics of elementary school science textbooks and laboratory observation books. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(3), 331-339.
- Yun, E. & Park, Y. (2011). Investigation of scientific terms in physics units of middle school science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1175-1185.
- Yun, E. & Park, Y. (2013). Analyzing the science words of physics in 'wise life' textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 127-138.
피인용 문헌
- Analysis of Processes in Reading about 'Science Stories' in 6th Grade Science Textbook Using Eye-tracking vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0383
- Reading Strategies of Elementary Science Textbook vol.61, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.26589/jockle..61.201703.33
- 대중매체의 과학기사에 대한 대중들의 인식과 고빈도로 사용되는 과학용어에 대한 이해도 조사 vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.4.535
- Readability of Korean-Language advertising disclosures moderates knowledge effects vol.38, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-03-2020-0090